Literature DB >> 21901933

Affective processes in human-automation interactions.

Stephanie M Merritt1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study contributes to the literature on automation reliance by illuminating the influences of user moods and emotions on reliance on automated systems.
BACKGROUND: Past work has focused predominantly on cognitive and attitudinal variables, such as perceived machine reliability and trust. However, recent work on human decision making suggests that affective variables (i.e., moods and emotions) are also important. Drawing from the affect infusion model, significant effects of affect are hypothesized. Furthermore, a new affectively laden attitude termed liking is introduced.
METHOD: Participants watched video clips selected to induce positive or negative moods, then interacted with a fictitious automated system on an X-ray screening task At five time points, important variables were assessed including trust, liking, perceived machine accuracy, user self-perceived accuracy, and reliance.These variables, along with propensity to trust machines and state affect, were integrated in a structural equation model.
RESULTS: Happiness significantly increased trust and liking for the system throughout the task. Liking was the only variable that significantly predicted reliance early in the task. Trust predicted reliance later in the task, whereas perceived machine accuracy and user self-perceived accuracy had no significant direct effects on reliance at any time.
CONCLUSION: Affective influences on automation reliance are demonstrated, suggesting that this decision-making process may be less rational and more emotional than previously acknowledged. APPLICATION: Liking for a new system may be key to appropriate reliance, particularly early in the task. Positive affect can be easily induced and may be a lever for increasing liking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21901933     DOI: 10.1177/0018720811411912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  6 in total

1.  A Little Anthropomorphism Goes a Long Way.

Authors:  Ewart J de Visser; Samuel S Monfort; Kimberly Goodyear; Li Lu; Martin O'Hara; Mary R Lee; Raja Parasuraman; Frank Krueger
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.888

2.  How different types of users develop trust in technology: a qualitative analysis of the antecedents of active and passive user trust in a shared technology.

Authors:  Jie Xu; Kim Le; Annika Deitermann; Enid Montague
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.661

3.  Automation-Induced Complacency Potential: Development and Validation of a New Scale.

Authors:  Stephanie M Merritt; Alicia Ako-Brew; William J Bryant; Amy Staley; Michael McKenna; Austin Leone; Lei Shirase
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-02-19

4.  Scared to Trust? - Predicting Trust in Highly Automated Driving by Depressiveness, Negative Self-Evaluations and State Anxiety.

Authors:  Johannes Kraus; David Scholz; Eva-Maria Messner; Matthias Messner; Martin Baumann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-23

5.  More Than a Feeling-Interrelation of Trust Layers in Human-Robot Interaction and the Role of User Dispositions and State Anxiety.

Authors:  Linda Miller; Johannes Kraus; Franziska Babel; Martin Baumann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-04-12

Review 6.  From Trust in Automation to Decision Neuroscience: Applying Cognitive Neuroscience Methods to Understand and Improve Interaction Decisions Involved in Human Automation Interaction.

Authors:  Kim Drnec; Amar R Marathe; Jamie R Lukos; Jason S Metcalfe
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.