Literature DB >> 2190144

Surveillance. Information for action.

W A Orenstein1, R H Bernier.   

Abstract

Success in immunization requires success in developing an adequate information base. While special studies are important, there is no substitute for surveillance systems. Such systems help evaluate health impact, monitor trends in reported disease and adverse events, and identify areas for more intense investigation. Surveillance data alone have played major roles in immunization strategy changes. Successful surveillance relies on cooperation by health care providers and health departments. While filling out forms and reporting cases may be viewed as a burden by some, such information in the aggregate becomes an important part of the knowledge base used to refocus implementation efforts and potentially to change strategies. Reporting by all physicians is particularly important when reported cases lead to aggressive control actions such as outbreak control. Rapid reporting even when cases are not confirmed can help health departments ensure that needed laboratory specimens are collected and allow control measures to be undertaken before disease containment becomes difficult. In conclusion, any immunization program worth instituting is worth monitoring. Surveillance represents constant vigilance to ensure effective control or elimination of disease.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2190144     DOI: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)36912-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am        ISSN: 0031-3955            Impact factor:   3.278


  4 in total

1.  The school-based immunization survey: an inexpensive tool for measuring vaccine coverage.

Authors:  L E Rodewald; K J Roghmann; P G Szilagyi; N L Winter; J R Campbell; S G Humiston
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Surveillance for the Expanded Programme on Immunization.

Authors:  F T Cutts; R J Waldman; H M Zoffman
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.408

3.  Evaluation of telephoned computer-generated reminders to improve immunization coverage at inner-city clinics.

Authors:  P A Stehr-Green; E F Dini; M L Lindegren; P A Patriarca
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Reporting efficiency during a measles outbreak in New York City, 1991.

Authors:  S F Davis; P M Strebel; W L Atkinson; L E Markowitz; R W Sutter; K S Scanlon; S Friedman; S C Hadler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 9.308

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.