| Literature DB >> 21901126 |
Chengqun Lv1, Baoling Huang, Mengji Qiao, Jiguang Wei, Bo Ding.
Abstract
Hemiberlesia pitysophila Takagi is an extremely harmful exotic insect in forest to Pinus species, including Pinus massoniana. Using both morphological taxonomy and molecular phylogenetics, we identified 15 strains of entomogenous fungi, which belong to 9 genera with high diversities. Surprisingly, we found that five strains that were classified as species of Pestalotiopsis, which has been considered plant pathogens and endophytes, were the dominant entomopathogenic fungus of H. pitysophila. Molecular phylogenetic tree established by analyzing sequences of ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer showed that entomopathogenic Pestalotiopsis spp. were similar to plant Pestalotiopsis, but not to other pathogens and endophytes of its host plant P. massoniana. We were the first to isolate entomopathogenic Pestalotiopsis spp. from H. pitysophila. Our findings suggest a potential and promising method of H. pitysophila bio-control.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21901126 PMCID: PMC3161996 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023649
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1The live and dead H. pitysophila were identified under a magnifier.
Live insects were shown in A and dead ones in B. Both adults (arrow) and nymphs (arrow head) were observed in one leaf. Fungi were found on most dead ones (asterisk).
Taxonomic identification of entomogenous fungi of Hemiberlesia pitysophila based on their morphology.
|
|
|
|
| 1 | This strain had fewer hyaline or light hyphae that frequently become bright dark-brown with age and undergo transformation to form chains of numerous, single-celled, ovoid-shaped conidia. Some conidia were produced through budding. | Genus |
| 2 | Same as No. 1 | |
| 3 | This strain had dark, disc- or cushion-shaped acervuli containing black, slimy spore masse and 5-celled, oval to spindle-shaped conidia. Their apical and basal cells were hyaline, while the median three cells were olivaceous; the upper two were the same as or slightly darker than the lower one. The apical cell was cylinder- or cone-shaped and slightly narrower than the basal cell. The fungi had flagella on its top and 0–1 root on its base. | Genus |
| 4 | This strain had hyaline, single-celled, oval conidia with many lateral or paired, but not verticillati branches and phialides on the tips of branches. It was distinct due to its rapid growth and compact or loose tufts in shapes of green. | Genus |
| 5 | This train had dark, mostly simple, very short or elongated conidiophores typically with simple or branching conidium chains. Conidia were dark in conical, elliptical, oval shapes and typically separated by both diaphragm and mediastinum. Individual conidiophore arises directly from substrata forming bushy heads consisting conidial chains, occasionally single, simple and branching appendages. | Genus |
| 6 | This train had nearly spherical conidiophore mother cells that produced mostly simple, hyaline conidiophores with elongated base except thick, dark, septate conidiophores. Its conidia were dark, 1-celled with spindle, oval shape and curved tip, and attached to lateral or and top of the conidiophores, often with a small bud scar at one side. | Genus |
| 7 | This strain had pycnidia in globose, ovoid, or flask-shaped, leathery or charry, black or dark brown color. It split in small holes, bears conidia on conidiophores or embeded in the substrata of pycnidia. | Family |
| 8 | The strain had 1-celled, elliptical or ovoid, hyaline conidia; waxy, disc-butterfly or pad shaped acervuli close to the tips of simple and elongated conidiophores, typically with dark spines or bristles in the middle or around the rim. |
|
| 9 | The strain was in the incompletely phase of | Genus |
| 10 | Same as No. 3 | |
| 11 | Same as No. 3 | |
| 12 | Same as No. 3 | |
| 13 | Same as No. 3 | |
| 14 | Same as No. 3 | |
| 15 | This strain had unbranched, solitary, erect conidiophores formed directly on the hyphal tips, the hyphal ropes or both. At the apices of the conidiophores were the hyaline conidia of 3–6×1.5–3 µm in size. | Genus |
Taxonomic identification of entomogenous fungi of Hemiberlesia pitysophila based on ITS sequences.
|
|
|
| |||
| Species/Strain/Sequence | GenBankAccession No | Value | Similarity | ||
| 1 | 576 |
| FJ216455.1 | 1029 | 99% |
| 2 | 607 |
| AY225166.1 | 1083 | 100% |
| 3 | 634 |
| EU273510.1 | 1260 | 100% |
| 4 | 632 |
| EU280133.1 | 1168 | 100% |
| 5 | 600 |
| EF432260.1 | 1105 | 100% |
| 6 | 608 |
| AB505426.1 | 1096 | 99% |
| 7 | 563 | Uncultured ascomycete | EU489900.1 | 1002 | 98% |
| 8 | 586 |
| AY266393.1 | 1083 | 100% |
| 9 | 566 |
| FJ478132.1 | 1026 | 99% |
| 10 | 631 |
| AB251918.1 | 1116 | 99% |
| 11 | 622 |
| EU273510.1 | 1249 | 100% |
| 12 | 631 |
| FJ481027.1 | 1105 | 98% |
| 13 | 548 |
| EU273510.1 | 1078 | 100% |
| 14 | 602 |
| DQ780418.1 | 1083 | 99% |
| 15 | 578 |
| FJ770373.1 | 1018 | 99% |
Group composition of entomogenous fungi of Herminerlesia pitysophila.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fungi imperfecti | Moniliales | Moniliaceae |
| 2 |
|
| 1 | |||
|
| 1 | |||
| Dematiaceae |
| 1 | ||
|
| 1 | |||
| Melanconiales | Melanconiaceae |
| 5 | |
|
| 2 | |||
| Sphaeropsidales | Sphaeropsidaceae | Unknown | 1 | |
| Ascomycetes | Sphaeriales | Diaporthaceae |
| 1 |
Figure 2Established phylogenetic tree of Pestalotiopsis and its related genera based on ITS sequences.
ITS sequences were aligned using ClustalX (1.81). The phylogenetic tree construction were conducted with neighbour-joining method packaged in software MEGA 4.0. Bootstrap = 1000. Diaporthe phaseolorum, Pleospora herbarum and Hypocrea schweinitzii were used as the outgroup. The Scale bar shows 5% nucleotide substitutions.
Mortality of Hemiberlesia pitysophila in virulence test.
| Strains | Repeat I | Repeat II | Repeat III | Average mortality | Average adjusted mortality | |||
| Mortality | Adjusted mortality | Mortality | Adjusted mortality | Mortality | Adjusted mortality | |||
| 3 | 93.28 | 70.88 | 100.00 | 77.60 | 95.65 | 73.25 | 95.65 | 73.91 |
| 10 | 97.97 | 75.57 | 100.00 | 77.60 | 93.90 | 71.50 | 97.29 | 74.89 |
| 11 | 100.00 | 77.60 | 95.65 | 73.25 | 83.05 | 60.65 | 92.90 | 70.50 |
| 12 | 98.64 | 76.24 | 96.39 | 73.99 | 75.00 | 52.60 | 90.01 | 67.61 |
| 13 | 97.06 | 74.66 | 100.00 | 77.60 | 81.54 | 59.14 | 92.89 | 70.47 |
| Control | 22.4 | 22.4 | 22.4 | 22.4 | ||||
ANOVA of the adjusted mortality for five strains.
| Source of differences | SS | df | MS | F | F crit |
| Intragroup | 103.4911 | 4 | 25.8728 | 0.8397 | F0.05 = 3.84 |
| Intergroup | 246.4814 | 8 | 30.8102 | ||
| Sum | 838.2601 | 12 |