Literature DB >> 21900084

Predictors of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT).

Ilan Goldenberg1, Arthur J Moss, W Jackson Hall, Elyse Foster, Jeffrey J Goldberger, Peter Santucci, Timothy Shinn, Scott Solomon, Jonathan S Steinberg, David Wilber, Alon Barsheshet, Scott McNitt, Wojciech Zareba, Helmut Klein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that combined assessment of factors that are associated with favorable reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization-defibrillator therapy (CRT-D) can be used to predict clinical response to the device. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The study population comprised 1761 patients enrolled in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT). Best-subset regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with echocardiographic response (defined as percent reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic volume 1 year after CRT-D implantation) and to create a response score. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to evaluate the CRT-D versus defibrillator-only reduction in the risk of heart failure or death by the response score. Seven factors were identified as associated with echocardiographic response to CRT-D and made up the response score (female sex, nonischemic origin, left bundle-branch block, QRS ≥150 milliseconds, prior hospitalization for heart failure, left ventricular end-diastolic volume ≥125 mL/m(2), and left atrial volume <40 mL/m(2)). Multivariate analysis showed a 13% (P<0.001) increase in the clinical benefit of CRT-D per 1-point increment in the response score (range, 0-14) and a significant direct correlation between risk reduction associated with CRT-D and response score quartiles: Patients in the first quartile did not derive a significant reduction in the risk of heart failure or death with CRT-D (hazard ratio=0.87; P=0.52); patients in the second and third quartiles derived 33% (P=0.04) and 36% (P=0.03) risk reductions, respectively; and patients in the upper quartile experienced a 69% (P<0.001) risk reduction (P for trend=0.005).
CONCLUSION: Combined assessment of factors associated with reverse remodeling can be used for improved selection of patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00180271.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21900084     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.014324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  70 in total

Review 1.  Heart failure in women.

Authors:  J Julia Shin; Eman Hamad; Sandhya Murthy; Ileana L Piña
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  Prognostic significance of beta-blocker up-titration in conjunction with cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure management.

Authors:  Takeru Nabeta; Takayuki Inomata; Yuichiro Iida; Yuki Ikeda; Miwa Iwamoto-Ishida; Shunsuke Ishii; Takashi Naruke; Tomohiro Mizutani; Hisahito Shinagawa; Toshimi Koitabashi; Ichiro Takeuchi; Junya Ako
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Coronary sinus lead delay index for optimization of coronary sinus lead placement.

Authors:  Mevlüt Koç; Onur Kaypakli; Gökhan Gözübüyük; Durmus Yıldıray Şahin
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 4.  Progress in heart failure treatment in Germany.

Authors:  Mark Luedde; Martina E Spehlmann; Norbert Frey
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 5.  His-Bundle Pacing and LV Endocardial Pacing as Alternatives to Traditional Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman; Faiz A Subzposh
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Non-response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Authors:  Syed Yaseen Naqvi; Anas Jawaid; Ilan Goldenberg; Valentina Kutyifa
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2018-10

7.  Prognostic significance of persistent restrictive filling pattern after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Masayoshi Yamamoto; Yoshihiro Seo; Tomoko Ishizu; Naoto Kawamatsu; Kimi Sato; Akinori Sugano; Akiko Atsumi; Yoshie Harimura; Tomoko Machino-Ohtsuka; Fumiko Sakamaki; Kazutaka Aonuma
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2014-12-03

8.  Is right ventricular mid-septal pacing superior to apical pacing in patients with high degree atrio-ventricular block and moderately depressed left ventricular function?

Authors:  Kang Chen; Ye Mao; Shao-hua Liu; Qiong Wu; Qing-zhi Luo; Wen-qi Pan; Qi Jin; Ning Zhang; Tian-you Ling; Ying Chen; Gang Gu; Wei-feng Shen; Li-qun Wu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 9.  Recent advances in the optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Satish Chandraprakasam; Gina G Mentzer
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2015-02

Review 10.  Sex and gender differences in myocarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  DeLisa Fairweather; Leslie T Cooper; Lori A Blauwet
Journal:  Curr Probl Cardiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.