Literature DB >> 21899914

Raising the bar for systematic conservation planning.

William T Langford1, Ascelin Gordon, Lucy Bastin, Sarah A Bekessy, Matt D White, Graeme Newell.   

Abstract

Systematic conservation planning (SCP) represents a significant step toward cost-effective, transparent allocation of resources for biodiversity conservation. However, research demonstrates important consequences of uncertainties in SCP and of basing methods on simplified circumstances involving few real-world complexities. Current research often relies on single case studies with unknown forms and amounts of uncertainty as well as low statistical power for generalizing results. Consequently, conservation managers have little evidence for the true performance of conservation planning methods in their own complex, uncertain applications. To build effective and reliable methods in SCP, there is a need for more challenging and integrated testing of their robustness to uncertainty and complexity, and much greater emphasis on generalization to real-world situations.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21899914     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  5 in total

1.  Ensemble distribution models in conservation prioritization: from consensus predictions to consensus reserve networks.

Authors:  Laura Meller; Mar Cabeza; Samuel Pironon; Morgane Barbet-Massin; Luigi Maiorano; Damien Georges; Wilfried Thuiller
Journal:  Divers Distrib       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 5.139

2.  Data acquisition for conservation assessments: is the effort worth it?

Authors:  Virgilio Hermoso; Mark J Kennard; Simon Linke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  What Data to Use for Forest Conservation Planning? A Comparison of Coarse Open and Detailed Proprietary Forest Inventory Data in Finland.

Authors:  Joona Lehtomäki; Sakari Tuominen; Tuuli Toivonen; Antti Leinonen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Incentivizing monitoring and compliance in trophy hunting.

Authors:  Nils Bunnefeld; Charles T T Edwards; Anagaw Atickem; Fetene Hailu; E J Milner-Gulland
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 6.560

5.  Importance of baseline specification in evaluating conservation interventions and achieving no net loss of biodiversity.

Authors:  J W Bull; A Gordon; E A Law; K B Suttle; E J Milner-Gulland
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 6.560

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.