Literature DB >> 21899904

Perceived risk and strategy efficacy as motivators of risk management strategy adoption to prevent animal diseases in pig farming.

N I Valeeva1, M A P M van Asseldonk, G B C Backus.   

Abstract

For Dutch fattening pig farms, this study explored (1) farmers' perceptions towards animal disease risks and animal health risk management; (2) factors underlying farmers' adoption of the two risk management strategies, namely, biosecurity measures and animal health programs. The risks included endemic and epidemic diseases. Data were obtained through a questionnaire (n=164). A behavioral model was developed using the Health Belief Model and tested using structural equation modeling. Endemic and epidemic diseases were regarded as an operational and catastrophic risk, respectively. Farmers considered severity of epidemics as slightly more important, compared to endemics. For both disease categories, farmers valued biosecurity measures as a more effective strategy than animal health programs. In the behavioral model, perceived benefits in terms of strategy efficacy was the strongest direct predictor of strategy adoption. Other behavioral components had a minor indirect effect, namely, via perceived benefits, and only in case of biosecurity measures. The indirect effect path did, however, vary per disease category. For endemics, such a path captured the effect of perceived susceptibility on perceived benefits mediated by perceived severity. For epidemics, it only captured the effect of perceived severity on perceived benefits. The results also revealed the importance of innate risk characteristics of farmers in their adoption decisions. In particular, general self-protection behavior directly contributed to decisions to adopt a certain strategy. The obtained knowledge highlights possible ways of improvement of programs aimed at promoting effective risk management strategies.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21899904     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  19 in total

1.  How Do Simulated Error Experiences Impact Attitudes Related to Error Prevention?

Authors:  Karen R Breitkreuz; Renae L Dougal; Melanie C Wright
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.929

2.  Farmers' Intentions to Implement Foot and Mouth Disease Control Measures in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Wudu T Jemberu; M C M Mourits; H Hogeveen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Exploring Attitudes and Beliefs towards Implementing Cattle Disease Prevention and Control Measures: A Qualitative Study with Dairy Farmers in Great Britain.

Authors:  Marnie L Brennan; Nick Wright; Wendela Wapenaar; Susanne Jarratt; Pru Hobson-West; Imogen F Richens; Jasmeet Kaler; Heather Buchanan; Jonathan N Huxley; Heather M O'Connor
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Pig producer perspectives on the use of meat inspection as an animal health and welfare diagnostic tool in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland.

Authors:  Catherine Devitt; Laura Boyle; D L Teixeira; N E O'Connell; M Hawe; Alison Hanlon
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.146

5.  The intention of North-Western Ethiopian dairy farmers to control mastitis.

Authors:  Sefinew Alemu Mekonnen; Gerrit Koop; Theo J G M Lam; Henk Hogeveen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Cattle producers' perceptions of biosecurity.

Authors:  Marnie L Brennan; Robert M Christley
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  On-farm biosecurity as perceived by professionals visiting Swedish farms.

Authors:  Maria Nöremark; Susanna Sternberg-Lewerin
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 1.695

8.  Swedish Farmers' Opinions about Biosecurity and Their Intention to Make Professionals Use Clean Protective Clothing When Entering the Stable.

Authors:  Maria Nöremark; Susanna Sternberg Lewerin; Linda Ernholm; Jenny Frössling
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-06-22

9.  Learning Processes and Trajectories for the Reduction of Antibiotic Use in Pig Farming: A Qualitative Approach.

Authors:  Nicolas Fortané; Florence Bonnet-Beaugrand; Anne Hémonic; Carole Samedi; Arnaud Savy; Catherine Belloc
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2015-10-22

10.  Perceived Risk, Expected Benefits and Pig Farmers' Behaviors of Veterinary Drug Usage.

Authors:  Jianhua Wang; Yuanyuan Deng; Hanyu Diao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.