Literature DB >> 21899812

EVerT: cryotherapy versus salicylic acid for the treatment of verrucae--a randomised controlled trial.

S Cockayne1, M Curran, G Denby, F Hashmi, C Hewitt, K Hicks, S Jayakody, A Kang'ombe, C McIntosh, N McLarnon, E Stamuli, K Thomas, G Turner, D Torgerson, I Watt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cryotherapy using liquid nitrogen versus patient daily self-treatment with 50% salicylic acid for the treatment of verrucae (plantar warts).
DESIGN: A multicentre, pragmatic, open, two-armed randomised controlled trial with an economic evaluation. Randomisation was simple, with the allocation sequence generated by a computer in a 1 : 1 ratio.
SETTING: Podiatry clinics, university podiatry schools and primary care in England, Scotland and Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: Patients were eligible if they presented with a verruca which, in the opinion of the health-care professional, was suitable for treatment with both salicylic acid and cryotherapy, and were aged 12 years and over.
INTERVENTIONS: Cryotherapy using liquid nitrogen delivered by a health-care professional compared with daily patient self-treatment with 50% salicylic acid (Verrugon, William Ransom & Son Plc, Hitchin, UK) for a maximum of 8 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was complete clearance of all verrucae at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes were complete clearance of all verrucae at 12 weeks, controlling for age, whether or not the verrucae had been previously treated and type of verrucae, with a second model to explore the effect of patient preferences, time to clearance of verrucae, clearance of verrucae at 6 months, number of verrucae at 12 weeks and patient satisfaction with the treatment.
RESULTS: In total, 240 eligible patients were recruited, with 117 patients allocated to the cryotherapy group and 123 to the salicylic acid group. There was no evidence of a difference in clearance rates between the treatment groups in the primary outcome [17/119 (14.3%) in the salicylic acid group vs 15/110 (13.6%) in the cryotherapy group; p = 0.89]. The results of the study did not change when controlled for age, whether or not the verrucae had been previously treated and type of verrucae, or when patient preferences were explored. There was no evidence of a difference in time to clearance of verrucae between the two groups [hazard ratio (HR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51 to 1.25; p = 0.33] or in the clearance of verrucae at 6 months (33.7% cryotherapy vs 30.5% salicylic acid). There was no evidence of a difference in the number of verrucae at 12 weeks between the two groups (incidence rate ratio 1.08, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.43; p = 0.62). Nineteen participants reported 28 adverse events, 14 in each group, with two treatment-related non-serious adverse events in the cryotherapy group. Cryotherapy was also associated with higher mean costs per additional healed patient (£101.17, 95% bias-corrected and accelerated CI £85.09 to £117.26). The probability of cryotherapy being cost-effective is 40% for a range of willingness-to-pay thresholds of £15,000-30,000 per patient healed.
CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence for a difference in terms of clearance of verrucae between cryotherapy and salicylic acid (at both 12 weeks and 6 months), number of verrucae at 12 weeks and time to clearance of verrucae. Cryotherapy was associated with higher mean costs per additional healed patient compared with salicylic acid. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN18994246. FUNDING: This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 15, No. 32. See the HTA programme website for further project information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21899812     DOI: 10.3310/hta15320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Technol Assess        ISSN: 1366-5278            Impact factor:   4.014


  7 in total

1.  Natural course of cutaneous warts among primary schoolchildren: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sjoerd C Bruggink; Just A H Eekhof; Paulette F Egberts; Sophie C E van Blijswijk; Willem J J Assendelft; Jacobijn Gussekloo
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 2.  Warts (non-genital).

Authors:  Steven King-Fan Loo; William Yuk-Ming Tang
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2014-06-12

3.  The effect of patients' preference on outcome in the EVerT cryotherapy versus salicylic acid for the treatment of plantar warts (verruca) trial.

Authors:  Sarah Cockayne; Kate Hicks; Arthur R Kangombe; Catherine Hewitt; Michael Concannon; Kim Thomas; Farina Hashmi; Caroline McIntosh; Gwen Brierley; David Torgerson; Ian Watt
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Implementation of blinded outcome assessment in the Effective Verruca Treatments trial (EverT) - lessons learned.

Authors:  Sarah Cockayne; Catherine Hewitt; Farina Hashmi; Kate Hicks; Michael Concannon; Caroline McIntosh; Kim Thomas; Jill Hall; Judith Watson; David Torgerson; Ian Watt
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Efficacy of cryotherapy for plantar warts: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sara García-Oreja; Francisco Javier Álvaro-Afonso; Aroa Tardáguila-García; Mateo López-Moral; Marta García-Madrid; José Luis Lázaro-Martínez
Journal:  Dermatol Ther       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.858

6.  EVerT2-needling versus non-surgical debridement for the treatment of verrucae: study protocol for a single-centre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Farina Hashmi; David Torgerson; Caroline Fairhurst; Sarah Cockayne; Kerry Bell; Michelle Cullen; Michael Harrison-Blount
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  A Retrospective Study of a Chinese Traditional Medicine YIKEER in the Treatment of Verruca Patients in Liaoning District.

Authors:  S B Jiang; Y S Lu; Y H Zhang; Y Wu; H X Wang; X H Gao; H D Chen
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 2.629

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.