Literature DB >> 2189950

Postoperative chemotherapy and tamoxifen compared with tamoxifen alone in the treatment of positive-node breast cancer patients aged 50 years and older with tumors responsive to tamoxifen: results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-16.

B Fisher1, C Redmond, S Legault-Poisson, N V Dimitrov, A M Brown, D L Wickerham, N Wolmark, R G Margolese, D Bowman, A G Glass.   

Abstract

The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) conducted a randomized clinical trial to determine whether tamoxifen (TAM) plus chemotherapy is more effective than TAM alone in improving disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and survival (S) of positive-node, TAM-responsive patients aged greater than or equal to 50 years. Women were randomized among three treatment groups: (1) TAM alone, (2) Adriamycin (doxorubicin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), cyclophosphamide, and TAM (ACT), or (3) melphalan (L-PAM), fluorouracil (5-FU), and TAM (PFT). The PFT arm was later modified so that new patients also received Adriamycin (PAFT). Findings from 1,124 eligible patients through 3 years of follow-up indicated a significantly better DFS for ACT-treated patients than for those receiving TAM alone (84% v 67%; P = .0004). An advantage in DDFS and S was also observed after ACT therapy (83% v 73% [P = .04 in the former] and 93% v 85% [P = .04 in the latter]). Both the DFS and DDFS of PAFT-treated patients were better than in those treated by TAM alone (83% v 66%, P = .0002 and 85% v 73%, P = .003). PFT patients also fared better in DFS and DDFS than TAM patients (81% v 72%, P = .07 and 85% v 74%, P = .02). Odds ratios consistently favored the three TAM-plus-chemotherapy groups. No significant S advantage is as yet evident in favor of the PAFT or PFT groups. Of importance is the failure of these studies to demonstrate an unfavorable interaction between the drug regimens used and the TAM, which was administered simultaneously. The findings related to the use of PAFT and PFT are of more biologic than clinical significance since L-PAM is rarely used in the treatment of breast cancer. The major conclusion from this study is the observance of a better outcome in positive-node breast cancer patients aged greater than or equal to 50 years from the use of postoperative prolonged TAM and short-course AC therapy (completed in 63 days) than from prolonged TAM therapy alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2189950     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.6.1005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  31 in total

1.  Chemotherapy for older women with node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  D Ginsburg
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-09-04       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  A role for antiangiogenic therapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Marsha A Moses; Jay Harper; Cecilia A Fernández
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Is the combinational administration of doxorubicin and glutathione a reasonable proposal?

Authors:  Bo-Yu Shen; Chong Chen; Yang-Fan Xu; Jia-Jia Shen; Hui-Min Guo; Hao-Feng Li; Xi-Nuo Li; Dian Kang; Yu-Hao Shao; Zhang-Pei Zhu; Xiao-Xi Yin; Lin Xie; Guang-Ji Wang; Yan Liang
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  High incidence of thromboembolic events in patients treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy: a large retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Russell A Moore; Nelly Adel; Elyn Riedel; Manisha Bhutani; Darren R Feldman; Nour Elise Tabbara; Gerald Soff; Rekha Parameswaran; Hani Hassoun
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  [No advantage to using the CMF-regimen for node positive, postmenopausal, receptor-positive mammary carcinoma with adjuvant tamoxifen therapy].

Authors:  E Heidemann
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Time-Varying Effects of Breast Cancer Adjuvant Systemic Therapy.

Authors:  Ismail Jatoi; Hanna Bandos; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; William F Anderson; Edward H Romond; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  The Globalization of Cooperative Groups.

Authors:  Manuel Valdivieso; Benjamin W Corn; Janet E Dancey; D Lawrence Wickerham; L Elise Horvath; Edith A Perez; Alison Urton; Walter M Cronin; Erica Field; Evonne Lackey; Charles D Blanke
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 4.929

8.  Adjuvant chemotherapy and timing of tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive, node-positive breast cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Kathy S Albain; William E Barlow; Peter M Ravdin; William B Farrar; Gary V Burton; Steven J Ketchel; Charles D Cobau; Ellis G Levine; James N Ingle; Kathleen I Pritchard; Allen S Lichter; Daniel J Schneider; Martin D Abeloff; I Craig Henderson; Hyman B Muss; Stephanie J Green; Danika Lew; Robert B Livingston; Silvana Martino; C Kent Osborne
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Combinational treatment of gap junctional activator and tamoxifen in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Gunjan Gakhar; Duy H Hua; Thu Annelise Nguyen
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.248

10.  Postmenopausal patients with node-positive resectable breast cancer. Tamoxifen vs FEC 50 (6 cycles) vs FEC 50 (6 cycles) plus tamoxifen vs control--preliminary results of a 4-arm randomised trial. The French Adjuvant Study Group.

Authors:  J P Gérard; M Héry; D Gedouin; A Monnier; M J Goudier; J P Jacquin; F Plat; E Cabarrot; D Serin; M Namer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.