Literature DB >> 21898768

Submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing predicts 90-day survival after liver transplantation.

James M Prentis1, Derek M D Manas, Michael I Trenell, Mark Hudson, David J Jones, Chris P Snowden.   

Abstract

Liver transplantation has a significant early postoperative mortality rate. An accurate preoperative assessment is essential for minimizing mortality and optimizing limited donor organ resources. This study assessed the feasibility of preoperative submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) for determining the cardiopulmonary reserve in patients being assessed for liver transplantation and its potential for predicting 90-day posttransplant survival. One hundred eighty-two patients underwent CPET as part of their preoperative assessment for elective liver transplantation. The 90-day mortality rate, critical care length of stay, and hospital length of stay were determined during the prospective posttransplant follow-up. One hundred sixty-five of the 182 patients (91%) successfully completed CPET; this was defined as the ability to determine a submaximal exercise parameter: the anaerobic threshold (AT). Sixty of the 182 patients (33%) underwent liver transplantation, and the mortality rate was 10.0% (6/60). The mean AT value was significantly higher for survivors versus nonsurvivors (12.0 ± 2.4 versus 8.4 ± 1.3 mL/minute/kg, P < 0.001). Logistic regression revealed that AT, donor age, blood transfusions, and fresh frozen plasma transfusions were significant univariate predictors of outcomes. In a multivariate analysis, only AT was retained as a significant predictor of mortality. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated sensitivity and specificity of 90.7% and 83.3%, respectively, with good model accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.92, 95% confidence interval = 0.82-0.97, P = 0.001). The optimal AT level for survival was defined to be >9.0 mL/minute/kg. The predictive value was improved when the ideal weight was substituted for the actual body weight of a patient with refractory ascites, even after a correction for the donor's age. In conclusion, the preoperative cardiorespiratory reserve (as defined by CPET) is a sensitive and specific predictor of early survival after liver transplantation. The predictive value of CPET requires further evaluation.
Copyright © 2011 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21898768     DOI: 10.1002/lt.22426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  28 in total

Review 1.  The Impact of Frailty, Sarcopenia, and Malnutrition on Liver Transplant Outcomes.

Authors:  Nikki Duong; Brett Sadowski; Amol S Rangnekar
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-05-01

Review 2.  Society for Translational Medicine Expert Consensus on the preoperative assessment of circulatory and cardiac functions and criteria for the assessment of risk factors in patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  Deruo Liu; Huanshun Wen; Jie He; Shugeng Gao; Shanqing Li; Lunxu Liu; Jianxing He; Yunchao Huang; Shidong Xu; Weimin Mao; Qunyou Tan; Chun Chen; Xiaofei Li; Zhu Zhang; Gening Jiang; Lin Xu; Lanjun Zhang; Jianhua Fu; Hui Li; Qun Wang; Lijie Tan; Danqing Li; Qinghua Zhou; Xiangning Fu; Zhongmin Jiang; Haiquan Chen; Wentao Fang; Xun Zhang; Yin Li; Ti Tong; Zhentao Yu; Yongyu Liu; Xiuyi Zhi; Tiansheng Yan; Xingyi Zhang; Alessandro Brunelli; Michele Salati; Kevin Phan; Yasuhiro Hida; Federico Venuta; Jin-Ho Choi; Kostas Papagiannopoulos; Duc Ha; Nuria Novoa
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Pretransplant sarcopenia: suffer or fight?

Authors:  Raffaele Brustia; Olivier Scatton
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 7.293

4.  Patients with Alcoholic Liver Disease Have Worse Functional Status at Time of Liver Transplant Registration and Greater Waitlist and Post-transplant Mortality Which Is Compounded by Older Age.

Authors:  Patrick McCabe; Artin Galoosian; Robert J Wong
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  The Liver Frailty Index Improves Mortality Prediction of the Subjective Clinician Assessment in Patients With Cirrhosis.

Authors:  Jennifer C Lai; Kenneth E Covinsky; Charles E McCulloch; Sandy Feng
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Frailty predicts waitlist mortality in liver transplant candidates.

Authors:  J C Lai; S Feng; N A Terrault; B Lizaola; H Hayssen; K Covinsky
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Multidisciplinary approach to cardiac and pulmonary vascular disease risk assessment in liver transplantation: An evaluation of the evidence and consensus recommendations.

Authors:  Lisa B VanWagner; Matthew E Harinstein; James R Runo; Christopher Darling; Marina Serper; Shelley Hall; Jon A Kobashigawa; Laura L Hammel
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  The predictors of post-transplant coronary events among liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Mohammad U Malik; Stuart D Russell; Aliaksei Pustavoitau; Matthews Chacko; Arif M Cosar; Carol B Thompson; Panagiotis Trilianos; Nabil N Dagher; Andrew M Cameron; Ahmet Gurakar
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 6.047

Review 9.  Sarcopenia and liver transplant: The relevance of too little muscle mass.

Authors:  Eric R Kallwitz
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  From NASH to HCC: current concepts and future challenges.

Authors:  Quentin M Anstee; Helen L Reeves; Elena Kotsiliti; Olivier Govaere; Mathias Heikenwalder
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 46.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.