Literature DB >> 21898026

Reply to: doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0765-z: Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer: first choice? A review of literature.

Marietta Bertleff, Johan Lange.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2012        PMID： 21898026     DOI： 10.1007/s00464-011-1868-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN： 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Perforated peptic ulcer: clinical presentation, surgical outcomes, and the accuracy of the Boey scoring system in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Varut Lohsiriwat; Siriluck Prapasrivorakul; Darin Lohsiriwat
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Comparison of laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated duodenal ulcers.

Authors:  R Lunevicius; M Morkevicius
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  H Lau
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584
  3 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic approach in gastrointestinal emergencies.

Authors:  Rosa M Jimenez Rodriguez; Juan José Segura-Sampedro; Mercedes Flores-Cortés; Francisco López-Bernal; Cristobalina Martín; Verónica Pino Diaz; Felipe Pareja Ciuro; Javier Padillo Ruiz
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.