| Literature DB >> 21897819 |
Luc Dannhoffer1, Arnaud Billet, Mathilde Jollivet, Patricia Melin-Heschel, Christelle Faveau, Frédéric Becq.
Abstract
Cystic fibrosis (Entities:
Keywords: CFTR; activator and inhibitor; cystic fibrosis; epithelial cells; ion transport
Year: 2011 PMID: 21897819 PMCID: PMC3159890 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2011.00048
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Figure 1(A) Chemical structure of the 2 pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyrazines previously tested compounds (RP107 and RP108) and newly synthesized compounds (RP146, 173, 185, and 193). (B) EC50 of different compounds tested determinate by iodide efflux in wt-CFTR-CHO. (C) Evaluation of the cytotoxicity of the six different derivatives. The toxicity of the compounds was evaluated as described in the experimental section. Results are presented as percentage of cell viability for wt-CFTR-CHO cells treated 24 h with 100 μM of each compound; n = 20 for each compound, except for RP146, n = 3 and for DMSO 100% and DMSO 0.1%, n = 10. (D) Bar chart showing RP193 (100 μM), forskolin (1 μM), and forskolin (1 μM) + RP193 (100 μM) dependent iodide efflux in wt-CFTR-CHO cells. n = 4 for each. (E) Bar chart showing cAMP levels in wt-CFTR-CHO cells stimulated by RP193 (100 μM), forskolin (1 μM) + RP193 (100 μM), or forskolin (1 μM). Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM of 8–16 measurements normalized to cAMP levels in the presence of 10 μM forskolin (100%) and are representative of two independent experiments. Ns: no significant differences with respect to experimental condition in which DMSO 0.1% was added, ***p < 0.001 using the t-test.
Figure 2Activation of CFTR current in CHO cells. Representative current traces for CFTR are shown in the basal state and after successive addition of forskolin (1 μM), RP193 (10 μM), and specific CFTR inhibitor CFTR-inh172 (10 μM) (A) or GPinh5a (100 pM) (B). (C) Representative current traces recorded after the successive addition of forskolin (1 μM) and RP193 (10 μM) in CHO-K1. Step protocol consisted of 300 ms voltage from −100 to +100 mV from a holding potential of −40 mV. (D) I/V curves (mean ± SE) for CFTR current in the four experimental conditions for the three different protocols used.
Figure 3Representative time course of whole-cell activation and inhibition of CFTR current at +40 mV. (A) Sequential addition of Fsk (1 μM), RP193 (10 μM), and CFTR-inh172 (10 μM) and (B) sequential addition of Fsk (1 μM), RP193 (10 μM), and GPinh5a (100 pM). Horizontal bars represent time of perfusion of different drugs.
Figure 4Single CFTR chloride channel activation by RP193 in wt-CFTR-CHO cells. (A) Continuous cell-attached recording obtained on a wt-CFTR-CHO showing the activation of CFTR chloride channel by 10 μM of RP193 in the bath in presence of forskolin (1 μM) at the potential of +60 mV. (B) Representative recording of rundown of CFTR after channel excision in presence of RP193 (10 μM). Insert depicts 1 min of channel opening recording in cell-attached configuration. (C) Representative recordings at various patch potentials as indicated in the presence of RP193 at (10 μM) in the bath and the associated I/V curve (D).
Figure 5Examples of iodide efflux curves as function of time on NuLi-1 cells (A), CuFi-1 (C) cultured at 37°C and CuFi-1 treated by low temperature (24 h, 27°C) (D) in basal conditions, stimulated by forskolin (10 μM), or by forskolin (10 μM) and RP193 (100 μM). Bar chart showing iodide efflux experiments on NuLi-1 (B), CuFi-1 treated by low temperature (24 h, 27°C) (E), CuFi-1 treated with miglustat (24 h, 100 μM) (F) and G551D-CHO cells (G). Cells were successively treated with forskolin (10 μM) and RP193 (100 μM) and NuLi-1 cells were equally treated by CFTR-inh172 (10 μM), n = 4 for each. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 using the t-test.
Figure 6Bar chart representing . ***p < 0.001 using the t-test.