Literature DB >> 21896014

Eosinophils elicit proliferation of naive and fungal-specific cells in vivo so enhancing a T helper type 1 cytokine profile in favour of a protective immune response against Cryptococcus neoformans infection.

Ana P Garro1, Laura S Chiapello, Jose L Baronetti, Diana T Masih.   

Abstract

Experimental Cryptococcus neoformans infection in rats has been shown to have similarities with human cryptococcosis, because as in healthy humans, rats can effectively contain cryptococcal infection. Moreover, it has been shown that eosinophils are components of the immune response to C. neoformans infections. In a previous in vitro study, we demonstrated that rat peritoneal eosinophils phagocytose opsonized live yeasts of C. neoformans, thereby triggering their activation, as indicated by the up-regulation of MHC and co-stimulatory molecules and the increase in interleukin-12, tumour necrosis factor-α and interferon-γ production. Furthermore, this work demonstrated that C. neoformans-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T lymphocytes cultured with these activated C. neoformans-pulsed eosinophils proliferated, and produced important amounts of T helper type 1 (Th1) cytokines in the absence of Th2 cytokine synthesis. In the present in vivo study, we have shown that C. neoformans-pulsed eosinophils are also able to migrate into lymphoid organs to present C. neoformans antigens, thereby priming naive and re-stimulating infected rats to induce T-cell and B-cell responses against infection with the fungus. Furthermore, the antigen-specific immune response induced by C. neoformans-pulsed eosinophils, which is characterized by the development of a Th1 microenvironment with increased levels of NO synthesis and C. neoformans-specific immunoglobulin production, was demonstrated to be able to protect rats against subsequent infection with fungus. In summary, the present work demonstrates that eosinophils act as antigen-presenting cells for the fungal antigen, hence initiating and modulating a C. neoformans-specific immune response. Finally, we suggest that C. neoformans-loaded eosinophils might participate in the protective immune response against these fungi.
© 2011 The Authors. Immunology © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21896014      PMCID: PMC3194227          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2011.03479.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Immunology        ISSN: 0019-2805            Impact factor:   7.397


  50 in total

Review 1.  Eosinophils function as antigen-presenting cells.

Authors:  Huan-Zhong Shi
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2004-06-24       Impact factor: 4.962

Review 2.  The eosinophil and its role in immunity to helminth infection.

Authors:  A E Butterworth
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 4.291

3.  Both Th1 and Th2 cytokines affect the ability of monoclonal antibodies to protect mice against Cryptococcus neoformans.

Authors:  D O Beenhouwer; S Shapiro; M Feldmesser; A Casadevall; M D Scharff
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Immunosuppression, interleukin-10 synthesis and apoptosis are induced in rats inoculated with Cryptococcus neoformans glucuronoxylomannan.

Authors:  Laura S Chiapello; José L Baronetti; María P Aoki; Susana Gea; Héctor Rubinstein; Diana T Masih
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.397

5.  Eosinophils promote allergic disease of the lung by regulating CD4(+) Th2 lymphocyte function.

Authors:  J R MacKenzie; J Mattes; L A Dent; P S Foster
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Immunosuppression in experimental cryptococcosis in rats: modification of macrophage functions by T suppressor cells. Macrophages functions in cryptococcosis.

Authors:  H R Rubinstein; C E Sotomayor; L A Cervi; C M Riera; D T Masih
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 2.574

7.  Migration and accumulation of eosinophils toward regional lymph nodes after airway allergen challenge.

Authors:  Catherine Duez; Azzeddine Dakhama; Adrian Tomkinson; Philippe Marquillies; Annette Balhorn; André-Bernard Tonnel; Donna L Bratton; Erwin W Gelfand
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 10.793

8.  Apoptosis induction by glucuronoxylomannan of Cryptococcus neoformans.

Authors:  L S Chiapello; M P Aoki; H R Rubinstein; D T Masih
Journal:  Med Mycol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 9.  Cryptococcosis.

Authors:  John R Perfect; Arturo Casadevall
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.982

10.  The CD16(+) (FcgammaRIII(+)) subset of human monocytes preferentially becomes migratory dendritic cells in a model tissue setting.

Authors:  Gwendalyn J Randolph; Guzman Sanchez-Schmitz; Ronald M Liebman; Knut Schäkel
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2002-08-19       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  The Regulatory Function of Eosinophils.

Authors:  Ting Wen; Marc E Rothenberg
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2016-10

Review 2.  Innate host defenses against Cryptococcus neoformans.

Authors:  Camaron Hole; Floyd L Wormley
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 3.422

3.  IL-23 dampens the allergic response to Cryptococcus neoformans through IL-17-independent and -dependent mechanisms.

Authors:  Wendy A Szymczak; Rani S Sellers; Liise-anne Pirofski
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Impact of surfactant protein D, interleukin-5, and eosinophilia on Cryptococcosis.

Authors:  Stephanie M Holmer; Kathy S Evans; Yohannes G Asfaw; Divey Saini; Wiley A Schell; Julie G Ledford; Richard Frothingham; Jo Rae Wright; Gregory D Sempowski; John R Perfect
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 5.  Eosinophils and mast cells in leishmaniasis.

Authors:  Nilda E Rodríguez; Mary E Wilson
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.829

6.  Innate Immune Responses to Cryptococcus.

Authors:  Lena J Heung
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-02

Review 7.  Immunity to Cryptococcus neoformans and C. gattii during cryptococcosis.

Authors:  Josie F Gibson; Simon A Johnston
Journal:  Fungal Genet Biol       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.495

8.  The Role of Cryptococcus in the Immune System of Pulmonary Cryptococcosis Patients.

Authors:  Jinlin Wang; Yunxiang Zeng; Weizhan Luo; Xiaohong Xie; Shiyue Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Eosinophils subvert host resistance to an intracellular pathogen by instigating non-protective IL-4 in CCR2-/- mice.

Authors:  A H Verma; C L Bueter; M E Rothenberg; G S Deepe
Journal:  Mucosal Immunol       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 7.313

Review 10.  The status of cryptococcosis in Latin America.

Authors:  Carolina Firacative; Jairo Lizarazo; María Teresa Illnait-Zaragozí; Elizabeth Castañeda
Journal:  Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 2.743

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.