OBJECTIVE: To generate structured detailed uniform convalescence recommendations after gynaecological surgery by a modified Delphi method amongst experts and a representative group of physicians. DESIGN: Modified Delphi study. SETTING: Expert physicians recruited by their respective medical boards and employed at different hospitals, doctor's surgeries and healthcare services. POPULATION: Twelve experts (five gynaecologists, two general practitioners [GPs] and five occupational physicians [OPs]) and a representative sample of 63 medical doctors. METHODS: Multidisciplinary detailed recommendations for graded resumption of relevant activities after uncomplicated hysterectomy (laparoscopic supracervical, total laparoscopic/laparoscopic-assisted, vaginal and abdominal hysterectomies) and laparoscopic adnexal surgery were developed. Recommendations were based on a literature review and a modified Delphi procedure among 12 experts, recruited in collaboration with the participating medical boards of gynaecologists, GPs and OPs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A multidisciplinary consensus of at least 67% on the relevant detailed convalescence recommendations in relation to hysterectomy and laparoscopic adnexal surgery. RESULTS: Out of initially 65 activities, the expert panel judged 38 activities relevant for convalescence recommendations. Consensus for all activities was achieved after four Delphi rounds and two group discussions. The recommendations were judged as feasible by a representative sample of 26 gynaecologists, 19 GPs and 18 OPs. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus between gynaecologists, GPs and OPs was achieved on all relevant convalescence recommendations regarding hysterectomy (abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic) and laparoscopic adnexal surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To generate structured detailed uniform convalescence recommendations after gynaecological surgery by a modified Delphi method amongst experts and a representative group of physicians. DESIGN: Modified Delphi study. SETTING: Expert physicians recruited by their respective medical boards and employed at different hospitals, doctor's surgeries and healthcare services. POPULATION: Twelve experts (five gynaecologists, two general practitioners [GPs] and five occupational physicians [OPs]) and a representative sample of 63 medical doctors. METHODS: Multidisciplinary detailed recommendations for graded resumption of relevant activities after uncomplicated hysterectomy (laparoscopic supracervical, total laparoscopic/laparoscopic-assisted, vaginal and abdominal hysterectomies) and laparoscopic adnexal surgery were developed. Recommendations were based on a literature review and a modified Delphi procedure among 12 experts, recruited in collaboration with the participating medical boards of gynaecologists, GPs and OPs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A multidisciplinary consensus of at least 67% on the relevant detailed convalescence recommendations in relation to hysterectomy and laparoscopic adnexal surgery. RESULTS: Out of initially 65 activities, the expert panel judged 38 activities relevant for convalescence recommendations. Consensus for all activities was achieved after four Delphi rounds and two group discussions. The recommendations were judged as feasible by a representative sample of 26 gynaecologists, 19 GPs and 18 OPs. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus between gynaecologists, GPs and OPs was achieved on all relevant convalescence recommendations regarding hysterectomy (abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic) and laparoscopic adnexal surgery.
Authors: Carina A C M Pittens; Antonie Vonk Noordegraaf; Saskia C van Veen; Johannes R Anema; Judith A F Huirne; Jacqueline E W Broerse Journal: Health Expect Date: 2013-08-29 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Christopher J Coroneos; Sophocles H Voineskos; Sylvie D Cornacchi; Charlie H Goldsmith; Teegan A Ignacy; Achilleas Thoma Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Antonie Vonk Noordegraaf; Judith A F Huirne; Hans A M Brölmann; Mark H Emanuel; Paul J M van Kesteren; Gunilla Kleiverda; Jos P Lips; Alexander Mozes; Andreas L Thurkow; Willem van Mechelen; Johannes R Anema Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: E V A Bouwsma; A Vonk Noordegraaf; Z Szlávik; H A M Brölmann; M H Emanuel; J P Lips; W van Mechelen; A Mozes; A L Thurkow; J A F Huirne; J R Anema Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2014-09
Authors: Antonie Vonk Noordegraaf; Judith A F Huirne; Carina A Pittens; Willem van Mechelen; Jacqueline E W Broerse; Hans A M Brölmann; Johannes R Anema Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2012-10-19 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Grigoris F Grimbizis; Stephan Gordts; Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo; Sara Brucker; Carlo De Angelis; Marco Gergolet; Tin-Chiu Li; Vasilios Tanos; Hans Brölmann; Luca Gianaroli; Rudi Campo Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2013-06-14 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Grigoris F Grimbizis; Stephan Gordts; Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo; Sara Brucker; Carlo De Angelis; Marco Gergolet; Tin-Chiu Li; Vasilios Tanos; Hans Brölmann; Luca Gianaroli; Rudi Campo Journal: Gynecol Surg Date: 2013-06-13
Authors: Esther Va Bouwsma; Johannes R Anema; Antonie Vonk Noordegraaf; Dirk L Knol; Judith E Bosmans; Steven E Schraffordt Koops; Paul Jm van Kesteren; W Marchien van Baal; Jos P Lips; Mark H Emanuel; Petrus C Scholten; Alexander Mozes; Albert H Adriaanse; Hans Am Brölmann; Judith Af Huirne Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2014-06-18