Literature DB >> 21895869

Correlation between mammographic findings and corresponding histopathology: potential predictors for biological characteristics of breast diseases.

Kentaro Tamaki1, Takanori Ishida, Minoru Miyashita, Masakazu Amari, Noriaki Ohuchi, Nobumitsu Tamaki, Hironobu Sasano.   

Abstract

The present study retrospectively evaluated the mammographic findings of 606 Japanese women with breast cancer (median age 50 years; range 27-89 years) and correlated them with histopathological characteristics. Mammographic findings were evaluated with an emphasis on mass shape, margin, density, calcification, and the presence of architectural distortion; these findings were correlated with histopathological characteristics such as intrinsic subtype, histological grade, lymphovascular invasion, and the Ki-67 labeling index. An irregular mass shape and masses with a spiculated margin were significantly higher in the group of patients with luminal A breast cancer than in patients with masses that were lobular or round, or in tumors with an indistinct or microlobulated periphery (P = 0.017, P = 0.024, P < 0.001, and P = 0.001, respectively). Irregular mass shape and spiculated periphery were significantly lower in patients with Grade 3 cancer (P < 0.001 for both). In terms of lymphovascular invasion, there were significant differences between oval and irregular or round mass shape (P = 0.008 and P = 0.034), between tumors with a microlobulated and indistinct periphery (P = 0.014), between tumors with a punctate and amorphous or pleomorphic calcification shape (P = 0.030 and 0.038), and between the presence and absence of architectural distortion (P = 0.027). Equivalent or low-density masses were also higher in Grade 1 breast cancers (P = 0.007). There were significant differences in the Ki-67 labeling index between irregular and lobular or round tumors (P < 0.001 and P = 0.014), as well as between spiculated and indistinct or microlobulated tumors (P < 0.001 for both). Significant differences were noted in the mammographic features of different primary breast cancer subtypes. These proposed mammographic diagnostic criteria based on biological characteristics may contribute to a more accurate prediction of biological behavior of breast malignancies.
© 2011 Japanese Cancer Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21895869     DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.02088.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Sci        ISSN: 1347-9032            Impact factor:   6.716


  18 in total

1.  Evaluation of an Automated Information Extraction Tool for Imaging Data Elements to Populate a Breast Cancer Screening Registry.

Authors:  Ronilda Lacson; Kimberly Harris; Phyllis Brawarsky; Tor D Tosteson; Tracy Onega; Anna N A Tosteson; Abby Kaye; Irina Gonzalez; Robyn Birdwell; Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Imaging features of breast cancers on digital breast tomosynthesis according to molecular subtype: association with breast cancer detection.

Authors:  Su Hyun Lee; Jung Min Chang; Sung Ui Shin; A Jung Chu; Ann Yi; Nariya Cho; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Prediction for pathological and immunohistochemical characteristics of triple-negative invasive breast carcinomas: the performance comparison between quantitative and qualitative sonographic feature analysis.

Authors:  Jia-Wei Li; Yu-Cheng Cao; Zhi-Jin Zhao; Zhao-Ting Shi; Xiao-Qian Duan; Cai Chang; Jian-Gang Chen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 7.034

4.  Stiffness of tumours measured by shear-wave elastography correlated with subtypes of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jung Min Chang; In Ae Park; Su Hyun Lee; Won Hwa Kim; Min Sun Bae; Hye Ryoung Koo; Ann Yi; Seung Ja Kim; Nariya Cho; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Biological characteristics of interval cancers: a role for biomarkers in the breast cancer screening.

Authors:  A Caldarella; D Puliti; E Crocetti; S Bianchi; V Vezzosi; P Apicella; M Biancalani; A Giannini; C Urso; F Zolfanelli; E Paci
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-09-09       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Detection of noncalcified breast cancer in patients with extremely dense breasts using digital breast tomosynthesis compared with full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Ann Yi; Jung Min Chang; Sung Ui Shin; A Jung Chu; Nariya Cho; Dong-Young Noh; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Preoperative Nomogram for Predicting Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis Risk in Breast Cancer: A Potential Application on Omitting Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy.

Authors:  Xi'E Hu; Jingyi Xue; Shujia Peng; Ping Yang; Zhenyu Yang; Lin Yang; Yanming Dong; Lijuan Yuan; Ting Wang; Guoqiang Bao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  The efficacy of molecular subtyping in predicting postoperative recurrence in breast-conserving therapy: a 15-study meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Peng Jiang; Han-Jin Wang; Jia-Yi Zhang; Yang Xu; Mu-Hong Guo; Bin Zhang; Chong-Yin Tang; Hong-Yong Cao; Shui Wang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  Is There a Correlation between the Presence of a Spiculated Mass on Mammogram and Luminal A Subtype Breast Cancer?

Authors:  Song Liu; Xiao-Dong Wu; Wen-Jian Xu; Qing Lin; Xue-Jun Liu; Ying Li
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Additive Benefit of Radiomics Over Size Alone in the Distinction Between Benign Lesions and Luminal A Cancers on a Large Clinical Breast MRI Dataset.

Authors:  Heather M Whitney; Nathan S Taylor; Karen Drukker; Alexandra V Edwards; John Papaioannou; David Schacht; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.