BACKGROUND: The corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) system has been implicated in the regulation of alcohol consumption. However, previous mouse knockout (KO) studies using continuous ethanol access have failed to conclusively confirm this. Recent studies have shown that CRF receptor type 1 (CRFR1) antagonists attenuate alcohol intake in the limited access "drinking in the dark" (DID) model of binge drinking. To avoid the potential nonspecific effects of antagonists, in this study, we tested alcohol drinking in CRFR1, CRFR2, CRF, and urocortin 1 (Ucn1) KO and corresponding wild-type (WT) littermates using the DID paradigm. METHODS: On days 1 to 3, the CRFR1, CRFR2, Ucn1, and CRF KO mice and their respective WT littermates were provided with 20% ethanol or 10% sucrose for 2 hours with water available at all other times. On day 4, access to ethanol or sucrose was increased to 4 hours. At the end of each drinking session, the volume of ethanol consumed was recorded, and at the conclusion of the last session, blood was also collected for blood ethanol concentration (BEC) analysis. RESULTS: CRFR1 KO mice had lower alcohol intakes and BECs and higher intakes of sucrose compared with WTs. In contrast, CRFR2 KO mice, while having reduced intakes initially, had similar alcohol intakes on days 2 to 4 and similar BECs as the WTs. To determine the ligand responsible, Ucn1 and CRF KO and WT mice were tested next. While Ucn1 KOs had similar alcohol intakes and BECs to their WTs, CRF KO mice showed reduced alcohol consumption and lower BECs compared with WTs. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that CRFR1 plays a key role in binge drinking and identify CRF as the ligand critically involved in excessive alcohol consumption.
BACKGROUND: The corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) system has been implicated in the regulation of alcohol consumption. However, previous mouse knockout (KO) studies using continuous ethanol access have failed to conclusively confirm this. Recent studies have shown that CRF receptor type 1 (CRFR1) antagonists attenuate alcohol intake in the limited access "drinking in the dark" (DID) model of binge drinking. To avoid the potential nonspecific effects of antagonists, in this study, we tested alcohol drinking in CRFR1, CRFR2, CRF, and urocortin 1 (Ucn1) KO and corresponding wild-type (WT) littermates using the DID paradigm. METHODS: On days 1 to 3, the CRFR1, CRFR2, Ucn1, and CRF KO mice and their respective WT littermates were provided with 20% ethanol or 10% sucrose for 2 hours with water available at all other times. On day 4, access to ethanol or sucrose was increased to 4 hours. At the end of each drinking session, the volume of ethanol consumed was recorded, and at the conclusion of the last session, blood was also collected for blood ethanol concentration (BEC) analysis. RESULTS:CRFR1 KO mice had lower alcohol intakes and BECs and higher intakes of sucrose compared with WTs. In contrast, CRFR2 KO mice, while having reduced intakes initially, had similar alcohol intakes on days 2 to 4 and similar BECs as the WTs. To determine the ligand responsible, Ucn1 and CRF KO and WT mice were tested next. While Ucn1 KOs had similar alcohol intakes and BECs to their WTs, CRF KO mice showed reduced alcohol consumption and lower BECs compared with WTs. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that CRFR1 plays a key role in binge drinking and identify CRF as the ligand critically involved in excessive alcohol consumption.
Authors: Kathleen Chu; George F Koob; Maury Cole; Eric P Zorrilla; Amanda J Roberts Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 2007-04-03 Impact factor: 3.533
Authors: Dennis R Sparta; Angela M Sparrow; Emily G Lowery; Jon R Fee; Darin J Knapp; Todd E Thiele Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2007-12-21 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Emily G Lowery; Angela M Sparrow; George R Breese; Darin J Knapp; Todd E Thiele Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2007-12-21 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Raúl Pastor; Carrie S McKinnon; Angela C Scibelli; Sue Burkhart-Kasch; Cheryl Reed; Andrey E Ryabinin; Sarah C Coste; Mary P Stenzel-Poore; Tamara J Phillips Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-07-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Dong Ji; Nicholas W Gilpin; Heather N Richardson; Catherine L Rivier; George F Koob Journal: Behav Pharmacol Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 2.293
Authors: Wolfgang H Sommer; Roberto Rimondini; Anita C Hansson; Philip A Hipskind; Donald R Gehlert; Christina S Barr; Markus A Heilig Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2007-06-21 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Donald R Gehlert; Andrea Cippitelli; Annika Thorsell; Anh Dzung Lê; Philip A Hipskind; Chafiq Hamdouchi; Jianliang Lu; Erik J Hembre; Jeffrey Cramer; Min Song; David McKinzie; Michelle Morin; Roberto Ciccocioppo; Markus Heilig Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2007-03-07 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: L Broccoli; S Uhrig; G von Jonquieres; K Schönig; D Bartsch; N J Justice; R Spanagel; W H Sommer; M Klugmann; A C Hansson Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2018-04-26 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Andrey E Ryabinin; Michael M Tsoory; Tamas Kozicz; Todd E Thiele; Adi Neufeld-Cohen; Alon Chen; Emily G Lowery-Gionta; William J Giardino; Simranjit Kaur Journal: Alcohol Date: 2012-03-22 Impact factor: 2.405