Literature DB >> 21895487

Differences between chondrocytes and bone marrow-derived chondrogenic cells.

Hongsen Chiang1, Chang-Hsun Hsieh, Yun-Han Lin, Shiming Lin, Jyy-Jih Tsai-Wu, Ching-Chuan Jiang.   

Abstract

Implantation of autologous chondrogenic cells has become the mainstay strategy for repairing articular cartilage defects. Because the availability of autologous chondrocytes is extremely limited, many recent studies have used artificially induced mesenchymal stem cells (iMSCs) as substitutes for chondrocytes. In this study, we analyzed the differences between the iMSCs and chondrocytes, including their molecular biological and mechanical properties. Human bone marrow-derived MSCs were collected and induced to exhibit the chondrogenic phenotype by culturing the pelleted MSCs in a chemically defined culture medium supplemented with transforming growth factor-beta 1. The molecular biological properties of iMSCs and culture-expanded chondrocytes, including their mRNA profiles and surface proteomics, were analyzed using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and flow cytometry, respectively. The biomechanical properties of iMSCs and native chondrocytes, including their surface topology, adhesion force, and membrane stiffness, were analyzed using atomic force microscopy (AFM). Both iMSCs and chondrocytes presented type II collagen and glycosaminoglycan, whereas only chondrocytes presented type X collagen. Flow cytometric assays showed that the expression of type II collagen and integrin-1 was higher in the chondrocytes than in the iMSCs. AFM revealed that the MSCs, iMSCs, and chondrocytes greatly differed in their shape. The MSCs were spindle shaped and easily distinguishable from the spherical chondrocytes. The iMSCs appeared round and resembled the spherical chondrocytes; however, the iMSCs were flatter with a central hump of condensed mass and a surrounding thin and broad pleat. The mean adhesion force and mean surface stiffness were significantly lower for the iMSCs (4.54 nN and 0.109 N/m, respectively) than for the chondrocytes (6.86 nN and 0.134 N/m, respectively). To conclude, although the iMSCs exhibited the chondrogenic phenotype, they differed from the chondrocytes in their molecular biological and mechanical properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21895487     DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   3.845


  12 in total

1.  Development of scaffold-free elastic cartilaginous constructs with structural similarities to auricular cartilage.

Authors:  Renata Giardini-Rosa; Paulo P Joazeiro; Kathryn Thomas; Kristina Collavino; Joanna Weber; Stephen D Waldman
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  Coculture-driven mesenchymal stem cell-differentiated articular chondrocyte-like cells support neocartilage development.

Authors:  Yueh-Hsun Yang; Anna J Lee; Gilda A Barabino
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 6.940

3.  Supplementation of exogenous adenosine 5'-triphosphate enhances mechanical properties of 3D cell-agarose constructs for cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  Ivana Gadjanski; Supansa Yodmuang; Kara Spiller; Sarindr Bhumiratana; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 4.  Autologous bone-marrow mesenchymal cell induced chondrogenesis (MCIC).

Authors:  Sung Woo Huh; Asode Ananthram Shetty; Saif Ahmed; Dong Hwan Lee; Seok Jung Kim
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-06-16

5.  Human chondrocyte migration behaviour to guide the development of engineered cartilage.

Authors:  Grace D O'Connell; Andrea R Tan; Victoria Cui; J Chloe Bulinski; James L Cook; Mukundan Attur; Steven B Abramson; Gerard A Ateshian; Clark T Hung
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 3.963

6.  Comparison of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Source Differentiation Toward Human Pediatric Aortic Valve Interstitial Cells within 3D Engineered Matrices.

Authors:  Bin Duan; Laura A Hockaday; Shoshana Das; Charlie Xu; Jonathan T Butcher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.056

7.  Combined effects of oscillating hydrostatic pressure, perfusion and encapsulation in a novel bioreactor for enhancing extracellular matrix synthesis by bovine chondrocytes.

Authors:  Arshan Nazempour; Chrystal R Quisenberry; Nehal I Abu-Lail; Bernard J Van Wie
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 8.  Biomechanics-driven chondrogenesis: from embryo to adult.

Authors:  Donald J Responte; Jennifer K Lee; Jerry C Hu; Kyriacos A Athanasiou
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Proteomic Analysis of Engineered Cartilage.

Authors:  Xinzhu Pu; Julia Thom Oxford
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2015

10.  Growth factor priming differentially modulates components of the extracellular matrix proteome in chondrocytes and synovium-derived stem cells.

Authors:  Elena Alegre-Aguarón; Sonal R Sampat; Jennifer C Xiong; Ryan M Colligan; J Chloë Bulinski; James L Cook; Gerard A Ateshian; Lewis M Brown; Clark T Hung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.