Literature DB >> 21895459

Follow-up effects of social comparison information on the quality of life of cancer patients: the moderating role of social comparison orientation.

Abraham P Buunk1, Femke T C Bennenbroek, Heidi E Stiegelis, Alfons C M van den Bergh, Robbert Sanderman, Mariët Hagedoorn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine how social comparison orientation (SCO) moderates the effects of three types of social comparison information on the global quality of life of cancer patients 2 weeks and 3 months later.
DESIGN: Cancer patients (n=226) were provided with social comparison information just prior to undergoing radiation therapy, using audiotapes. Each participant was confronted with one of three tapes: (1) focusing on procedural aspects, (2) focusing on emotional reactions and (3) focusing on coping strategies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quality of life as measured with the Cantril self-anchoring scale [Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press].
RESULTS: With increasing SCO, a lower quality of life was reported after listening to the emotion tape, while a higher quality of life was reported after listening to the coping tape. These effects were found 2 weeks as well as 3 months after the radiation therapy had ended.
CONCLUSION: Social comparison information may have longitudinal effects on quality of life, but these effects are to an important extent dependent on the nature of the information and individual differences in SCO.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21895459     DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2011.613994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Health        ISSN: 0887-0446


  3 in total

1.  Social comparisons predict health-related quality of life and depressive symptoms across the first year of breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Laura C Bouchard; Hannah M Fisher; Charles S Carver; Youngmee Kim; Michael H Antoni
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Can physical activity compensate for low socioeconomic status with regard to poor self-rated health and low quality-of-life?

Authors:  Lisbeth M Johansson; Hans Lingfors; Marie Golsäter; Margareta Kristenson; Eleonor I Fransson
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 3.186

3.  Social Comparison and Stress Appraisal in Women with Chronic Illness.

Authors:  M Carmen Terol Cantero; Miguel Bernabé; Maite Martín-Aragón; Carolina Vázquez; Abraham P Buunk
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.