Literature DB >> 21895099

Verification of two minimally invasive methods for the estimation of the contact pressure in human vocal folds during phonation.

Li-Jen Chen1, Luc Mongeau.   

Abstract

The contact pressure on the vocal fold surface during high pitch or amplitude voice production is believed to be one major source of phonotrauma. Models for the quantitative estimate of the contact pressure may be valuable for prevention and treatment. Various indirect and minimally invasive approaches have been purported to estimate contact pressure. But the accuracy of these methods has not yet been objectively verified in controlled laboratory settings. In the present study, two indirect approaches for the estimation of the contact pressure were investigated. One is based on a Hertzian impact model, and the other on a finite element model. A probe microphone was used for direct measurements of the contact pressure and verifications of the indirect approaches. A silicone replica of human vocal folds was used as a test bed. Consistent contact pressure estimations were obtained using all three methods. The advantages and disadvantages of each approach for eventual clinical applications are described.
© 2011 Acoustical Society of America

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21895099      PMCID: PMC3188974          DOI: 10.1121/1.3613708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  19 in total

1.  A finite-element model of vocal-fold vibration.

Authors:  F Alipour; D A Berry; I R Titze
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A mechanical model of vocal-fold collision with high spatial and temporal resolution.

Authors:  Heather E Gunter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Vocal fold impact stress analysis.

Authors:  J J Jiang; A G Shah; M M Hess; K Verdolini; F M Banzali; D G Hanson
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Endolaryngeal contact pressures.

Authors:  M M Hess; K Verdolini; W Bierhals; U Mansmann; M Gross
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Correspondence of electroglottographic closed quotient to vocal fold impact stress in excised canine larynges.

Authors:  K Verdolini; R Chan; I R Titze; M Hess; W Bierhals
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Benign pathologic responses of the larynx.

Authors:  S D Gray; E Hammond; D F Hanson
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  A methodological study of hemilaryngeal phonation.

Authors:  J J Jiang; I R Titze
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 8.  Mechanical stress in phonation.

Authors:  I R Titze
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 9.  Measurement of vocal fold intraglottal pressure and impact stress.

Authors:  J J Jiang; I R Titze
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Histologic investigation of hyperphonated canine vocal cords.

Authors:  S Gray; I Titze
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.547

View more
  9 in total

1.  Vocal fold contact pressure in a three-dimensional body-cover phonation model.

Authors:  Zhaoyan Zhang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A Flow Perfusion Bioreactor System for Vocal Fold Tissue Engineering Applications.

Authors:  Neda Latifi; Hossein K Heris; Scott L Thomson; Rani Taher; Siavash Kazemirad; Sara Sheibani; Nicole Y K Li-Jessen; Hojatollah Vali; Luc Mongeau
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 3.056

3.  Study of spatiotemporal liquid dynamics in a vibrating vocal fold by using a self-oscillating poroelastic model.

Authors:  Austin Scholp; Caroline Jeddeloh; Chao Tao; Xiaojun Liu; Seth H Dailey; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Vocal fold contact patterns based on normal modes of vibration.

Authors:  Simeon L Smith; Ingo R Titze
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Determination of strain field on the superior surface of excised larynx vocal folds using DIC.

Authors:  Hani Bakhshaee; Jonathan Young; Justin C W Yang; Luc Mongeau; Amir K Miri
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Toward Development of a Vocal Fold Contact Pressure Probe: Bench-Top Validation of a Dual-Sensor Probe Using Excised Human Larynx Models.

Authors:  Daryush D Mehta; James B Kobler; Steven M Zeitels; Matías Zañartu; Byron D Erath; Mohsen Motie-Shirazi; Sean D Peterson; Robert H Petrillo; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Appl Sci (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.679

7.  Vocal fold dynamics in a synthetic self-oscillating model: Contact pressure and dissipated-energy dose.

Authors:  Mohsen Motie-Shirazi; Matías Zañartu; Sean D Peterson; Byron D Erath
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 2.482

8.  Direct measurement and modeling of intraglottal, subglottal, and vocal fold collision pressures during phonation in an individual with a hemilaryngectomy.

Authors:  Daryush D Mehta; James B Kobler; Steven M Zeitels; Matías Zañartu; Emiro J Ibarra; Gabriel A Alzamendi; Rodrigo Manriquez; Byron D Erath; Sean D Peterson; Robert H Petrillo; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Appl Sci (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 2.838

9.  Estimating Vocal Fold Contact Pressure from Raw Laryngeal High-Speed Videoendoscopy Using a Hertz Contact Model.

Authors:  Manuel E Díaz-Cádiz; Sean D Peterson; Gabriel E Galindo; Víctor M Espinoza; Mohsen Motie-Shirazi; Byron D Erath; Matías Zañartu
Journal:  Appl Sci (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.679

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.