Literature DB >> 21895033

3D-conformal RT, fixed-field IMRT and RapidArc, which one is better for esophageal carcinoma treated with elective nodal irradiation.

D Wang1, Y Yang, J Zhu, B Li, J Chen, Y Yin.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the characteristics of 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), fixed-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and RapidArc for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with elective nodal irradiation (ENI). CT datasets of 20 patients with ESCC were included and plans for single and double arcs of RapidArc (RA1 and RA2), 7-field IMRT and 3D-CRT were created and optimized for each patient. The goal was to deliver 59.6 Gy to ≥95% of the planning target volume (40 Gy to electively irradiated lymph nodal regions) while meeting the same normal-tissue dose constraints. The plans were compared based on dosimetric characteristics of target and organs at risk (OARs), monitor units (MUs), and appraised beam-on time. Both RA2 and IMRT resulted in similar target coverage (V95%, 97.84±1.50% for RA2 versus 96.96±1.15% for IMRT), homogeneity index (HI, 0.11±0.02 for RA2 versus 0.10±0.01 for IMRT) and conformity index (CI, 0.81±0.03 for RA2 versus 0.79±0.04 for IMRT), which displayed slightly better than single arc (V95%=94.55±1.50%, HI=0.12±0.02, CI=0.80±0.02) and much better than 3D-CRT (V95%=91.17±2.89%, HI=0.15±0.03, CI=0.60±0.07). The total lung V20, V30 was reduced approximately from 31%, 16% (3D-CRT) to 22%, 13% (IMRT) and 20%, 12% (RA2); the heart V30, V40 from 29%, 21% (3D-CRT) to 28%, 20% (IMRT) and 27%, 18% (RA2). The maximum dose to the spinal cord was 44.26±2.60 Gy for 3D-CRT, 42.47±2.40 Gy for IMRT, and 42.79±1.81 Gy for RA2. The number of MUs per fraction reduced from 990±165 (IMRT) to 503±70 (3D-CRT) and 502±79 (RA2). Appraised beam-on time of RapidArc was 1.2-2.4 min, which was lower than IMRT with 5.4 min by average. RapidArc, especially for double arcs plan could provide slight improvements in OARs sparing and lower MUs without compromised target qualities compared with IMRT, which was much better than 3D-CRT for ESCC treated with ENI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21895033     DOI: 10.7785/tcrt.2012.500225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 1533-0338


  11 in total

1.  Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs. c-IMRT in esophageal cancer: a treatment planning comparison.

Authors:  Li Yin; Hao Wu; Jian Gong; Jian-Hao Geng; Fan Jiang; An-Hui Shi; Rong Yu; Yong-Heng Li; Shu-Kui Han; Bo Xu; Guang-Ying Zhu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Increased risk of death due to heart disease after radiotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan Frandsen; Dustin Boothe; David K Gaffney; Brent D Wilson; Shane Lloyd
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-10

Review 3.  Advances in radiotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Wei Deng; Steven H Lin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-02

4.  Impact of Radiation on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Older Resectable Esophageal Cancer Patients With Medicare.

Authors:  Reith R Sarkar; Ahmadreza Hatamipour; Neil Panjwani; P Travis Courtney; Daniel R Cherry; Mia A Salans; Anthony T Yip; Brent S Rose; Daniel R Simpson; Matthew P Banegas; James D Murphy
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.787

5.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy with more than 60 Gy improved the survival of inoperable patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A population-based real-world study.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Qing Xie; Bifa Zhu; Xiaokang Wang; Ling He; Yong Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Volumetric modulated arc therapy versus intensity-modulated proton therapy in neoadjuvant irradiation of locally advanced oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Eren Celik; Wolfgang Baus; Christian Baues; Wolfgang Schröder; Alessandro Clivio; Antonella Fogliata; Marta Scorsetti; Simone Marnitz; Luca Cozzi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Elective lymph node irradiation late course accelerated hyper-fractionated radiotherapy plus concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase II study.

Authors:  Dongqing Wang; Jiali Yang; Jingyu Zhu; Baosheng Li; Limin Zhai; Mingping Sun; Heyi Gong; Tao Zhou; Yumei Wei; Wei Huang; Zhongtang Wang; Hongsheng Li; Zicheng Zhang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  A broad scope knowledge based model for optimization of VMAT in esophageal cancer: validation and assessment of plan quality among different treatment centers.

Authors:  Antonella Fogliata; Giorgia Nicolini; Alessandro Clivio; Eugenio Vanetti; Sarbani Laksar; Angelo Tozzi; Marta Scorsetti; Luca Cozzi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 9.  Comparison of IMRT versus 3D-CRT in the treatment of esophagus cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dandan Xu; Guowen Li; Hongfei Li; Fei Jia
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy-Based or Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy-Based Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Wei-Cheng Lin; Chia-Lun Chang; Han-Lin Hsu; Kevin Sheng-Po Yuan; Alexander T H Wu; Szu-Yuan Wu
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.