Literature DB >> 21894468

The effect of insurance status on outcomes after partial nephrectomy.

Al'a Abdo1, Quoc-Dien Trinh, Maxine Sun, Jan Schmitges, Marco Bianchi, Jesse Sammon, Shahrokh F Shariat, Shyam Sukumar, Kevin Zorn, Claudio Jeldres, Paul Perrotte, Craig G Rogers, James O Peabody, Mani Menon, Pierre I Karakiewicz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Privately insured patients may have favorable health outcomes when compared to those covered by federally funded initiatives. This study explored the effect of insurance status on five short-term outcomes after partial nephrectomy (PN).
METHODS: Within the Health Care Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), we focused on PNs performed between 1998 and 2007. We tested the rates of in-hospital mortality, blood transfusions, prolonged length of stay, as well as intraoperative and postoperative complications, stratified according to insurance status. Multivariable logistic regression analyses fitted with general estimation equations for clustering among hospitals further adjusted for confounding factors.
RESULTS: Overall, 8,513 PNs were identified. Of those, most patients were privately insured (53.5%), followed by Medicare (37.5%), uninsured (4.6%) and Medicaid (4.4%). Medicare and Medicaid patients had higher rates of transfusions (P < 0.001) and overall postoperative complications (P < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, when compared to privately insured patients, Medicaid patients had higher rates of transfusions (OR = 1.91, P < 0.001) and prolonged length of stay (OR = 1.49, P < 0.001). Medicare patients had higher rates of overall postoperative complications (OR = 1.24, P = 0.015) and length of stay beyond the median (OR = 1.4, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Patients with private insurance undergoing PN have better short-term outcomes, when compared to their publicly insured counterparts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21894468     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-011-0056-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  21 in total

1.  Comparison of complications after radical and partial nephrectomy: results from the National Veterans Administration Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  J M Corman; D F Penson; K Hur; S F Khuri; J Daley; W Henderson; J N Krieger
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths.

Authors:  R A Dudley; K L Johansen; R Brand; D J Rennie; A Milstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass.

Authors:  Steven C Campbell; Andrew C Novick; Arie Belldegrun; Michael L Blute; George K Chow; Ithaar H Derweesh; Martha M Faraday; Jihad H Kaouk; Raymond J Leveillee; Surena F Matin; Paul Russo; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

6.  Insurance status and hospital care for myocardial infarction, stroke, and pneumonia.

Authors:  Omar Hasan; E John Orav; LeRoi S Hicks
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.960

7.  Analysis of complications following partial and total nephrectomy for renal cancer in a population based sample.

Authors:  Fadi N Joudi; Veerasathpurush Allareddy; Christopher J Kane; Badrinath R Konety
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Morbidity and mortality following colorectal surgery in patients with end-stage renal failure: a population-based study.

Authors:  Sebastien Drolet; Anthony R Maclean; Robert P Myers; Abdel Aziz M Shaheen; Elijah Dixon; W Donald Buie
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery.

Authors:  C B Begg; L D Cramer; W J Hoskins; M F Brennan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-25       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Multi-institutional validation of a new renal cancer-specific survival nomogram.

Authors:  Pierre I Karakiewicz; Alberto Briganti; Felix K-H Chun; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Paul Perrotte; Vincenzo Ficarra; Luca Cindolo; Alexandre De la Taille; Jacques Tostain; Peter F A Mulders; Laurent Salomon; Richard Zigeuner; Tommaso Prayer-Galetti; Denis Chautard; Antoine Valeri; Eric Lechevallier; Jean-Luc Descotes; Herve Lang; Arnaud Mejean; Jean-Jacques Patard
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  8 in total

1.  Complications of primary and revision functional endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  James G Krings; Dorina Kallogjeri; Andre Wineland; Kenneth G Nepple; Jay F Piccirillo; Anne E Getz
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Medicaid status is associated with higher surgical site infection rates after spine surgery.

Authors:  Mark W Manoso; Amy M Cizik; Richard J Bransford; Carlo Bellabarba; Jens Chapman; Michael J Lee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Medicaid beneficiaries undergoing complex surgery at quality care centers: insights into the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Erin C Hall; Chaoyi Zheng; Russell C Langan; Lynt B Johnson; Nawar Shara; Waddah B Al-Refaie
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Medicaid status is associated with higher complication rates after spine surgery.

Authors:  Jacques Hacquebord; Amy M Cizik; Sree Harsha Malempati; Mark A Konodi; Richard J Bransford; Carlo Bellabarba; Jens Chapman; Michael J Lee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Complications following primary and revision transsphenoidal surgeries for pituitary tumors.

Authors:  James G Krings; Dorina Kallogjeri; Andre Wineland; Kenneth G Nepple; Jay F Piccirillo; Anne E Getz
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  The impact of insurance status on the outcomes after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Pui Man Rosalind Lai; Hormuzdiyar Dasenbrock; Ning Lin; Rose Du
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A Multi-institutional Analysis of Insurance Status as a Predictor of Morbidity Following Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Brittany L Vieira; Steven T Lanier; Alexei S Mlodinow; Kevin P Bethke; Robert X Murphy; Keith M Hume; Karol A Gutowski; Neil A Fine; John Y S Kim
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-12-05

8.  Acceptance of Simulated Adult Patients With Medicaid Insurance Seeking Care in a Cancer Hospital for a New Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Victoria A Marks; Walter R Hsiang; James Nie; Patrick Demkowicz; Waez Umer; Afash Haleem; Bayan Galal; Irene Pak; Dana Kim; Michelle C Salazar; Elizabeth R Berger; Daniel J Boffa; Michael S Leapman
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-07-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.