BACKGROUND/AIMS: The lack of a system to classify invasive procedures to treat local complications of acute pancreatitis is an obstacle to comparing interventions. This study aimed to develop and validate a comprehensive multidisciplinary classification. METHODS: Standardized terminology was used to develop a classification of procedures based on three key components: how the lesion is visualized, the route used during the procedure, and the procedure's purpose. Gastroenterologists, radiologists, and surgeons (n = 22) from three New Zealand centers independently classified 15 published technique descriptions. Inter-rater reliability was calculated for each component. The classification's clarity, ease of use, and potential to achieve its objectives were rated on a Likert scale. RESULTS: The classification's clarity, ease of use, and potential to achieve its objectives had median scores of 4/5. Inter-rater reliability for visualization, route, and purpose components was substantial at 0.73 (95% CI 0.63-0.82), 0.79 (95% CI 0.70-0.87), and 0.64 (95% CI 0.53-0.74), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This article describes the development and validation of a comprehensive classification for the wide range of procedures used to treat the local complications of acute pancreatitis. It has substantial inter-rater reliability and high acceptability, which should enhance communication between clinicians and facilitate comparison between procedures.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The lack of a system to classify invasive procedures to treat local complications of acute pancreatitis is an obstacle to comparing interventions. This study aimed to develop and validate a comprehensive multidisciplinary classification. METHODS: Standardized terminology was used to develop a classification of procedures based on three key components: how the lesion is visualized, the route used during the procedure, and the procedure's purpose. Gastroenterologists, radiologists, and surgeons (n = 22) from three New Zealand centers independently classified 15 published technique descriptions. Inter-rater reliability was calculated for each component. The classification's clarity, ease of use, and potential to achieve its objectives were rated on a Likert scale. RESULTS: The classification's clarity, ease of use, and potential to achieve its objectives had median scores of 4/5. Inter-rater reliability for visualization, route, and purpose components was substantial at 0.73 (95% CI 0.63-0.82), 0.79 (95% CI 0.70-0.87), and 0.64 (95% CI 0.53-0.74), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This article describes the development and validation of a comprehensive classification for the wide range of procedures used to treat the local complications of acute pancreatitis. It has substantial inter-rater reliability and high acceptability, which should enhance communication between clinicians and facilitate comparison between procedures.
Authors: Lu Ke; Wenjian Mao; Jing Zhou; Bo Ye; Gang Li; Jingzhu Zhang; Peng Wang; Zhihui Tong; John Windsor; Weiqin Li Journal: World J Surg Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Mateusz Jagielski; Marian Smoczyński; Jacek Szeliga; Krystian Adrych; Marek Jackowski Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Xiaowu Dong; Wenjian Mao; Lu Ke; Lin Gao; Jing Zhou; Bo Ye; Gang Li; Anthony Phillips; Zhihui Tong; John Windsor; Weiqin Li Journal: Gastroenterol Res Pract Date: 2021-07-10 Impact factor: 2.260