Literature DB >> 21893500

Large prospective study of ovarian cancer screening in high-risk women: CA125 cut-point defined by menopausal status.

Steven J Skates1, Phuong Mai, Nora K Horick, Marion Piedmonte, Charles W Drescher, Claudine Isaacs, Deborah K Armstrong, Saundra S Buys, Gustavo C Rodriguez, Ira R Horowitz, Andrew Berchuck, Mary B Daly, Susan Domchek, David E Cohn, Linda Van Le, John O Schorge, William Newland, Susan A Davidson, Mack Barnes, Wendy Brewster, Masoud Azodi, Stacy Nerenstone, Noah D Kauff, Carol J Fabian, Patrick M Sluss, Susan G Nayfield, Carol H Kasten, Dianne M Finkelstein, Mark H Greene, Karen Lu.   

Abstract

Previous screening trials for early detection of ovarian cancer in postmenopausal women have used the standard CA125 cut-point of 35 U/mL, the 98th percentile in this population yielding a 2% false positive rate, whereas the same cut-point in trials of premenopausal women results in substantially higher false positive rates. We investigated demographic and clinical factors predicting CA125 distributions, including 98th percentiles, in a large population of high-risk women participating in two ovarian cancer screening studies with common eligibility criteria and screening protocols. Baseline CA125 values and clinical and demographic data from 3,692 women participating in screening studies conducted by the National Cancer Institute-sponsored Cancer Genetics Network and Gynecologic Oncology Group were combined for this preplanned analysis. Because of the large effect of menopausal status on CA125 levels, statistical analyses were conducted separately in pre- and postmenopausal subjects to determine the impact of other baseline factors on predicted CA125 cut-points on the basis of 98th percentile. The primary clinical factor affecting CA125 cut-points was menopausal status, with premenopausal women having a significantly higher cut-point of 50 U/mL, while in postmenopausal subjects the standard cut-point of 35 U/mL was recapitulated. In premenopausal women, current oral contraceptive (OC) users had a cut-point of 40 U/mL. To achieve a 2% false positive rate in ovarian cancer screening trials and in high-risk women choosing to be screened, the cut-point for initial CA125 testing should be personalized primarily for menopausal status (50 for premenopausal women, 40 for premenopausal on OC, and 35 for postmenopausal women). ©2011 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21893500      PMCID: PMC3172691          DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)        ISSN: 1940-6215


  13 in total

1.  Factors influencing serum CA125II levels in healthy postmenopausal women.

Authors:  D K Pauler; U Menon; M McIntosh; H L Symecko; S J Skates; I J Jacobs
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Ovarian cancer death reduction for women at high risk: workload implications for gynaecology services.

Authors:  M Hannemann; R Fox; M James
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Factors influencing serum CA 125 levels in normal women.

Authors:  S Grover; M A Quinn; P Weideman; H Koh
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Screening for ovarian cancer: a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  I J Jacobs; S J Skates; N MacDonald; U Menon; A N Rosenthal; A P Davies; R Woolas; A R Jeyarajah; K Sibley; D G Lowe; D H Oram
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-04-10       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Prospectively detected cancer in familial breast/ovarian cancer screening.

Authors:  A Dørum; K Heimdal; K Løvslett; G Kristensen; L J Hansen; R Sandvei; A Schiefloe; B Hagen; A Himmelmann; F Jerve; K Shetelig; I Fjaerestad; C Tropé; P Møller
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality.

Authors:  Susan M Domchek; Tara M Friebel; Christian F Singer; D Gareth Evans; Henry T Lynch; Claudine Isaacs; Judy E Garber; Susan L Neuhausen; Ellen Matloff; Rosalind Eeles; Gabriella Pichert; Laura Van t'veer; Nadine Tung; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Fergus J Couch; Wendy S Rubinstein; Patricia A Ganz; Mary B Daly; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Gail Tomlinson; Joellen Schildkraut; Joanne L Blum; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

Authors:  Noah D Kauff; Jaya M Satagopan; Mark E Robson; Lauren Scheuer; Martee Hensley; Clifford A Hudis; Nathan A Ellis; Jeff Boyd; Patrick I Borgen; Richard R Barakat; Larry Norton; Mercedes Castiel; Khedoudja Nafa; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-05-20       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  A prospective study of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and longitudinal CA-125 screening among women at increased genetic risk of ovarian cancer: design and baseline characteristics: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Mark H Greene; Marion Piedmonte; Dave Alberts; Mitchell Gail; Martee Hensley; Zoe Miner; Phuong L Mai; Jennifer Loud; Gustavo Rodriguez; Jack Basil; John Boggess; Peter E Schwartz; Joseph L Kelley; Katie E Wakeley; Lori Minasian; Stephen Skates
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Pre- and postmenopausal high-risk women undergoing screening for ovarian cancer: anxiety, risk perceptions, and quality of life.

Authors:  Martee L Hensley; Mark E Robson; Noah D Kauff; Beata Korytowsky; Mercedes Castiel; Jamie Ostroff; Karen Hurley; Lucy E Hann; Jasmine Colon; David Spriggs
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 10.  The CA 125 tumour-associated antigen: a review of the literature.

Authors:  I Jacobs; R C Bast
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Modern trends into the epidemiology and screening of ovarian cancer. Genetic substrate of the sporadic form.

Authors:  Maria Koutsaki; Apostolos Zaravinos; Demetrios A Spandidos
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer using the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm with Frequent CA125 Testing in Women at Increased Familial Risk - Combined Results from Two Screening Trials.

Authors:  Steven J Skates; Mark H Greene; Saundra S Buys; Phuong L Mai; Powel Brown; Marion Piedmonte; Gustavo Rodriguez; John O Schorge; Mark Sherman; Mary B Daly; Thomas Rutherford; Wendy R Brewster; David M O'Malley; Edward Partridge; John Boggess; Charles W Drescher; Claudine Isaacs; Andrew Berchuck; Susan Domchek; Susan A Davidson; Robert Edwards; Steven A Elg; Katie Wakeley; Kelly-Anne Phillips; Deborah Armstrong; Ira Horowitz; Carol J Fabian; Joan Walker; Patrick M Sluss; William Welch; Lori Minasian; Nora K Horick; Carol H Kasten; Susan Nayfield; David Alberts; Dianne M Finkelstein; Karen H Lu
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Circulating biomarkers in epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosis: from present to future perspective.

Authors:  Martina Montagnana; Marco Benati; Elisa Danese
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-07

4.  Biomarkers and endosalpingiosis in the ovarian and tubal microenvironment of women at high-risk for pelvic serous carcinoma.

Authors:  Christine Gruessner; Angelika Gruessner; Katherine Glaser; Nisreen Abushahin; Cynthia Laughren; Wenxin Zheng; Setsuko K Chambers
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.166

5.  Ovarian cancer screening: development of the risk of ovarian cancer algorithm (ROCA) and ROCA screening trials.

Authors:  Steven J Skates
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.437

6.  Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI) in Evaluation of Adnexal Mass.

Authors:  Rujuta Javdekar; Nandita Maitra
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-10-07

Review 7.  Challenging and complex decisions in the management of the BRCA mutation carrier.

Authors:  Daniela L Stan; Lynne T Shuster; Myra J Wick; Casey L Swanson; Sandhya Pruthi; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Validity of Cancer Antigen-125 (CA-125) and Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI) in the Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Khawla Al-Musalhi; Manal Al-Kindi; Fatma Ramadhan; Thuraya Al-Rawahi; Khalsa Al-Hatali; Waad-Allah Mula-Abed
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2015-11

9.  Pathologic findings at risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: primary results from Gynecologic Oncology Group Trial GOG-0199.

Authors:  Mark E Sherman; Marion Piedmonte; Phuong L Mai; Olga B Ioffe; Brigitte M Ronnett; Linda Van Le; Iouri Ivanov; Maria C Bell; Stephanie V Blank; Paul DiSilvestro; Chad A Hamilton; Krishnansu S Tewari; Katie Wakeley; Noah D Kauff; S Diane Yamada; Gustavo Rodriguez; Steven J Skates; David S Alberts; Joan L Walker; Lori Minasian; Karen Lu; Mark H Greene
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Characterization of Cell-Bound CA125 on Immune Cell Subtypes of Ovarian Cancer Patients Using a Novel Imaging Platform.

Authors:  Germán González; Kornél Lakatos; Jawad Hoballah; Roberta Fritz-Klaus; Lojain Al-Johani; Jeff Brooker; Sinyoung Jeong; Conor L Evans; Petra Krauledat; Daniel W Cramer; Robert A Hoffman; W Peter Hansen; Manish S Patankar
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-25       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.