Literature DB >> 21893356

Horse owners' biosecurity practices following the first equine influenza outbreak in Australia.

K Schemann1, M R Taylor, J-A L M L Toribio, N K Dhand.   

Abstract

A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 759 Australian horse owners to determine their biosecurity practices and perceptions one year after the 2007 equine influenza outbreak and to investigate the factors influencing these perceptions and practices. A web link to an online questionnaire was sent to 1224 horse owners as a follow-up to a previous study to obtain information about biosecurity perceptions and practices, impacts of the 2007 EI outbreak, demographic information and information about horse industry involvement. Ordinal logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine factors associated with poor biosecurity practices. Biosecurity compliance (low, medium, high), as determined by horse owners' responses to a 16-item question on the frequency of various biosecurity measures, was used as the outcome variable in ordinal logistic regression analyses. Variables with a univariable p-value ≤0.2 were eligible for inclusion in multivariable models built using a manual stepwise approach. Variables with a p-value <0.05 in multivariable models were retained in the final model. Two potential confounders - age and gender of participants - were included in the final model irrespective of their p-values. Thirty percent of the respondents had low biosecurity compliance and were performing biosecurity practices 'not very often' or 'never'. Younger people, people with two or more children, those who were not involved with horses commercially and those who had no long-term business impacts resulting from the 2007 EI outbreak were more likely to have lower biosecurity compliance. People who were not fearful of a future outbreak of equine influenza in Australia and those who thought their current hygiene and access control practices were not very effective in protecting their horses also had poor biosecurity practices. In this observational study we identified factors associated with a group of horse owners with low levels of biosecurity compliance. As this cross-sectional study only assesses associations, the identified factors should be further investigated in order to be considered in the design of extension activities to increase horse owners' biosecurity compliance.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21893356     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  11 in total

1.  Explanation and Elaboration Document for the STROBE-Vet Statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology-Veterinary Extension.

Authors:  A M O'Connor; J M Sargeant; I R Dohoo; H N Erb; M Cevallos; M Egger; A K Ersbøll; S W Martin; L R Nielsen; D L Pearl; D U Pfeiffer; J Sanchez; M E Torrence; H Vigre; C Waldner; M P Ward
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 2.  A Review on Equine Influenza from a Human Influenza Perspective.

Authors:  Fleur Whitlock; Pablo R Murcia; J Richard Newton
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 5.818

3.  Human Preferences for Conformation Attributes and Head-And-Neck Positions in Horses.

Authors:  Georgina L Caspar; Navneet K Dhand; Paul D McGreevy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Perceptions of vulnerability to a future outbreak: a study of horse managers affected by the first Australian equine influenza outbreak.

Authors:  Kathrin Schemann; Simon M Firestone; Melanie R Taylor; Jenny-Ann L M L Toribio; Michael P Ward; Navneet K Dhand
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  A Survey on Transport Management Practices Associated with Injuries and Health Problems in Horses.

Authors:  Barbara Padalino; Sharanne L Raidal; Evelyn Hall; Peter Knight; Pietro Celi; Leo Jeffcott; Gary Muscatello
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Difficulties experienced by veterinarians when communicating about emerging zoonotic risks with animal owners: the case of Hendra virus.

Authors:  Diana H Mendez; Petra Büttner; Jenny Kelly; Madeleine Nowak; Rick Speare Posthumously
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  "Why won't they just vaccinate?" Horse owner risk perception and uptake of the Hendra virus vaccine.

Authors:  J Manyweathers; H Field; N Longnecker; K Agho; C Smith; M Taylor
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  A Survey-Based Investigation of Human Factors Associated With Transport Related Injuries in Horses.

Authors:  Barbara Padalino; Chris W Rogers; Danielle Guiver; Kirrilly R Thompson; Christopher B Riley
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-11-22

Review 9.  Modeling Dynamic Human Behavioral Changes in Animal Disease Models: Challenges and Opportunities for Addressing Bias.

Authors:  Arata Hidano; Gareth Enticott; Robert M Christley; M Carolyn Gates
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-06-21

10.  Zoonotic disease risk perceptions in the British veterinary profession.

Authors:  Charlotte Robin; Judy Bettridge; Fiona McMaster
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.670

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.