Literature DB >> 21892117

Continuous facial nerve stimulating burr for otologic surgeries.

Daniele Bernardeschi1, Nawel Meskine, Naif Al Otaibi, Reka Ablonczy, Michel Kalamarides, Alexis Bozorg Grayeli, Olivier Sterkers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a continuous facial nerve (FN) stimulating burr (the StimBurGard) during otologic/neurotologic procedures in terms of safety and reliability when drilling in contact with the Fallopian canal (FC) of the mastoid segment of the FN. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective clinical trial.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Thirty-five patients operated through translabyrinthine (TL) approach for vestibular schwannoma removal were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 (5 patients): the stimulation current was set at 3 and then at 2 mA visualizing the localization of the burr when the first response at 100-μV threshold was obtained in the mastoid cavity. Group 2 (15 patients): exposure of the FC in the mastoid segment during TL approach was stopped when the first response was obtained at 1-mA stimulation; FC thickness in the second genu and mastoid segment of the FC was evaluated on a postoperative computed tomographic (CT) scan, and FC dehiscence observed on CT scan was compared with surgical observation. Group 3 (15 patients), exposure of the FC was performed as routinely done during a TL approach and surgical observation of FC dehiscence; stimulation values in mA at the 100 μV threshold and FC thickness on postoperative CT scan were evaluated. In all cases, the stimulation value at the cerebellopontine angle root of the FN with a 100-μV response threshold was measured before tumor resection.
RESULTS: Group 1: stimulation at 3 mA occurred in aditus ad antrum and at 2 mA near the FC. Group 2: mean thickness of 1.09 ± 0.69 mm with 2 cases of radiologic dehiscence of the FN. Group 3: the stimulation threshold was 0.6 ± 0.37 mA, and the thickness was 0.41 ± 0.56 mm with 9 cases of uncovered FN (p = 0.0082). In all patients, FN at brainstem was stimulated at 0.03 mA before VS dissection.
CONCLUSION: Continuous FN stimulating burr by means of the StimBurGard system is a safe and effective tool for FN stimulation and identification. The integrity of FC is preserved in most cases when the stimulation intensity is 1 mA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21892117     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31822ec097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  4 in total

1.  Warning navigation system using real-time safe region monitoring for otologic surgery.

Authors:  Byunghyun Cho; Masamichi Oka; Nozomu Matsumoto; Riichi Ouchida; Jaesung Hong; Makoto Hashizume
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Facial canal dehiscence in patients with cholesteatoma: concordance between intraoperative inspection, computed tomography and neurophysiological findings.

Authors:  Francisco Arias-Marzán; Gemma de Lucas-Carmona; Esteban Reinaldo Pacheco Coronel; Pedro Javier Perez Lorensu; Alejandro Jiménez-Sosa; Blas Pérez-Piñero
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Intraoperative identification of the facial nerve by needle electromyography stimulation with a burr.

Authors:  N N Khamgushkeeva; I A Anikin; A A Korneyenkov
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

4.  Prospective Validation of Facial Nerve Monitoring to Prevent Nerve Damage During Robotic Drilling.

Authors:  Juan Ansó; Cilgia Dür; Mareike Apelt; Frederic Venail; Olivier Scheidegger; Kathleen Seidel; Helene Rohrbach; Franck Forterre; Matthias S Dettmer; Inti Zlobec; Klaus Weber; Marco Matulic; Masoud Zoka-Assadi; Markus Huth; Marco Caversaccio; Stefan Weber
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2019-10-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.