Literature DB >> 21892091

Extended-field irradiation and intracavitary brachytherapy combined with cisplatin and amifostine for cervical cancer with positive para-aortic or high common iliac lymph nodes: results of arm II of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0116.

William Small1, Kathryn Winter, Charles Levenback, Revathy Iyer, Sharon R Hymes, Anuja Jhingran, David Gaffney, Beth Erickson, Kathy Greven.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0116 was designed to test the ability of amifostine (Ethyol; MedImmune LLC, Gaithersburg, MD), a cytoprotective agent, to reduce the acute toxicity of combined therapy with extended-field irradiation, brachytherapy, and cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with cervical cancer with para-aortic or high common iliac disease. This report presents the results of part 2.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0116 was a 2-part trial. Part 1 delivered extended-field irradiation, brachytherapy, and cisplatin; part 2 added amifostine and required 16 evaluable patients to assess an improved toxicity profile. Eligibility included evidence for high common iliac or para-aortic metastasis. Patients were treated for a total dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions with intracavitary irradiation. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy was not allowed. The final point A dose was 85 Gy low-dose rate equivalent. High-dose rate techniques were allowed. The positive para-aortic and iliac nodes were to be boosted to 54 to 59.4 Gy. Amifostine at 500 mg was to be delivered with every fraction of radiotherapy.
RESULTS: The study opened on August 1, 2001, and closed March 3, 2007, after accruing 45 patients, 18 for the second part with amifostine. This analysis reports the primary end point for the patients entered on part 2 of the study. Three patients were excluded, one was ineligible, and 2 withdrew. The median follow-up was 22.9 months (range, 6.5-45.4 months). The median dose of amifostine delivered was 5000 mg (range, 500-13,500 mg). Thirteen patients (87%) experienced an acute grade 3/4 toxicity (excluding grade 3 leukopenia). This compared to an 81% rate in part 1 of the trial. The estimated median survival was 34.8 months with a 20% late grade 3/4 toxicity rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Amifostine, as delivered in this study, did not reduce acute toxicity in this patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21892091     DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31822c2769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  9 in total

Review 1.  The role of intensity modulated radiotherapy in gynecological radiotherapy: Present and future.

Authors:  Ana Fernandez-Ots; Juanita Crook
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-10-03

2.  Radiation therapy oncology group gynecologic oncology working group: comprehensive results.

Authors:  David K Gaffney; Anuja Jhingran; Lorraine Portelance; Akila Viswanathan; Tracey Schefter; Joanne Weidhaas; William Small
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 3.  Emerging targets for radioprotection and radiosensitization in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Sumit Kumar; Rajnish Kumar Singh; Ramovatar Meena
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-06-19

Review 4.  Para-aortic lymph node involvement in cervical cancer: Implications for staging, outcome and treatment.

Authors:  T S Shylasree; Lavanya Gurram; Ushashree Das
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 5.274

5.  Treatment outcomes of extended-field radiation therapy and the effect of concurrent chemotherapy on uterine cervical cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Hong In Yoon; Jihye Cha; Ki Chang Keum; Ha Yoon Lee; Eun Ji Nam; Sang Wun Kim; Sunghoon Kim; Young Tae Kim; Gwi Eon Kim; Yong Bae Kim
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Advanced small cell carcinoma of the cervix - Successful treatment with concurrent etoposide and cisplatin chemotherapy and extended field radiation: A case report and discussion.

Authors:  Amishi Bajaj; Mahesh Gopalakrishnan; Matthew M Harkenrider; John R Lurain; William Small
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-11-08

7.  Early toxicity and treatment outcomes of extended field-intensity modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer patients with para-aortic nodal metastasis.

Authors:  Meetakshi Gupta; Supriya Chopra; Shreya Kunder; A Dheera; Devaraju Sampathirao; Reena Engineer; Jaya Ghosh; Lavanya Gurram; Umesh Mahantshetty; Sudeep Gupta; Shyam Shrivastava
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2019-08-06

8.  Prognostic factors associated with radiotherapy for cervical cancer with computed tomography-detected para-aortic lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Szu-Yuan Wu; Eng-Yen Huang; Chan-Chao Chanchien; Hao Lin; Chong-Jong Wang; Li-Min Sun; Hui-Chun Chen; Fu-Min Fang; Hsuan-Chih Hsu; Yu-Jie Huang
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 2.724

9.  Impact of boost irradiation on pelvic lymph node control in patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Masaru Wakatsuki; Tatsuya Ohno; Shingo Kato; Ken Ando; Shin-Ei Noda; Hiroki Kiyohara; Kei Shibuya; Kumiko Karasawa; Tadashi Kamada; Takashi Nakano
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 2.724

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.