OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of cervical muscle strength on head impact biomechanics. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING: Field setting. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-seven volunteer ice hockey players (age = 15.0 ± 1.0 years, height = 173.5 ± 6.2 cm, mass = 66.6 ± 9.0 kg, playing experience = 2.9 ± 3.7 years). INTERVENTIONS: Participants were equipped with accelerometer-instrumented helmets to collect head impact biomechanics (linear and rotational acceleration) throughout an entire playing season. Before the season, isometric cervical muscle strength was measured for the anterior neck flexors, anterolateral neck flexors, cervical rotators, posterolateral neck extensors, and upper trapezius. Data were analyzed using random intercept general mixed linear models, with each individual player as a repeating factor/cluster. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Dependent variables included linear and rotational head accelerations. Cervical strength data were categorized into tertiles, creating groups with high, moderate, and low strength. Strength measures were averaged and normalized to body mass. RESULTS: Significant differences in cervical muscle strength existed across our strength groups (P < 0.05). No differences were observed in linear or rotational acceleration across strength groups for the anterior neck flexors (PLin = 0.399; PRot = 0.060), anterolateral neck flexors (PLin = 0.987; PRot = 0.579), cervical rotators (PLin = 0.136; PRot = 0.238), posterolateral neck extensors (PLin = 0.883; PRot = 0.101), or upper trapezius (PLin = 0.892; PRot = 0.689). CONCLUSIONS: Our hypothesis that players with greater static neck strength would experience lower resultant head accelerations was not supported. This contradicts the notion that cervical muscle strength mitigates head impact acceleration. Because we evaluated cervical strength isometrically, future studies should consider dynamic (ie, isokinetic) methods in the context of head impact biomechanics.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of cervical muscle strength on head impact biomechanics. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING: Field setting. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-seven volunteer ice hockey players (age = 15.0 ± 1.0 years, height = 173.5 ± 6.2 cm, mass = 66.6 ± 9.0 kg, playing experience = 2.9 ± 3.7 years). INTERVENTIONS:Participants were equipped with accelerometer-instrumented helmets to collect head impact biomechanics (linear and rotational acceleration) throughout an entire playing season. Before the season, isometric cervical muscle strength was measured for the anterior neck flexors, anterolateral neck flexors, cervical rotators, posterolateral neck extensors, and upper trapezius. Data were analyzed using random intercept general mixed linear models, with each individual player as a repeating factor/cluster. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Dependent variables included linear and rotational head accelerations. Cervical strength data were categorized into tertiles, creating groups with high, moderate, and low strength. Strength measures were averaged and normalized to body mass. RESULTS: Significant differences in cervical muscle strength existed across our strength groups (P < 0.05). No differences were observed in linear or rotational acceleration across strength groups for the anterior neck flexors (PLin = 0.399; PRot = 0.060), anterolateral neck flexors (PLin = 0.987; PRot = 0.579), cervical rotators (PLin = 0.136; PRot = 0.238), posterolateral neck extensors (PLin = 0.883; PRot = 0.101), or upper trapezius (PLin = 0.892; PRot = 0.689). CONCLUSIONS: Our hypothesis that players with greater static neck strength would experience lower resultant head accelerations was not supported. This contradicts the notion that cervical muscle strength mitigates head impact acceleration. Because we evaluated cervical strength isometrically, future studies should consider dynamic (ie, isokinetic) methods in the context of head impact biomechanics.
Authors: Calvin Kuo; Jodie Sheffels; Michael Fanton; Ina Bianca Yu; Rosa Hamalainen; David Camarillo Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2019-05-29 Impact factor: 4.118
Authors: Jonathan Elliott; Neil Heron; Theo Versteegh; Ian A Gilchrist; Michael Webb; Pooler Archbold; Nigel D Hart; Kerry Peek Journal: Sports Med Date: 2021-06-18 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: James T Eckner; Youkeun K Oh; Monica S Joshi; James K Richardson; James A Ashton-Miller Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2014-01-31 Impact factor: 6.202