Literature DB >> 21890885

The optimal dose of prophylactic intravenous naloxone in ameliorating opioid-induced side effects in children receiving intravenous patient-controlled analgesia morphine for moderate to severe pain: a dose finding study.

Constance L Monitto1, Sabine Kost-Byerly, Elizabeth White, Carlton K K Lee, Michelle A Rudek, Carol Thompson, Myron Yaster.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Opioid-induced side effects, such as pruritus, nausea, and vomiting are common and may be more debilitating than pain itself. A continuous low-dose naloxone infusion (0.25 μg/kg/h) ameliorates some of these side effects in many but not all patients without adversely affecting analgesia. We sought to determine the optimal dose of naloxone required to minimize opioid-induced side effects and to measure plasma morphine and naloxone levels in a dose escalation study.
METHODS: Fifty-nine pediatric patients (24 male/35 female; average age 14.2 ± 2.2 years) experiencing moderate to severe postoperative pain were started on IV patient-controlled analgesia morphine (basal infusion 20 μg/kg/h, demand dose 20 μg/kg, 5 doses/h) and a low-dose naloxone infusion (initial cohort: 0.05 μg/kg/h; subsequent cohorts: 0.10, 0.15, 0.25, 0.40, 0.65, 1, and 1.65 μg/kg/h). If 2 patients developed intolerable nausea, vomiting, or pruritus, the naloxone infusion was increased for subsequent patients. Dose/treatment success occurred when 10 patients had minimal side effects at a naloxone dose. Blood samples were obtained for measurement of plasma morphine and naloxone levels after initiation of the naloxone infusion, processed, stored, and measured by tandem mass spectrometry with electrospray positive ionization.
RESULTS: The minimum naloxone dose at which patients were successfully treated with a <10% side effect/failure rate was 1 μg/kg/h; cohort size varied between 4 and 11 patients. Naloxone was more effective in preventing pruritus than nausea and vomiting. Concomitant use of supplemental medicines to treat opioid-induced side effects was required at all naloxone infusion rates. Plasma naloxone levels were below the level of assay quantification (0.1 ng/mL) for infusion rates ≤0.15 μg/kg/h. At rates >0.25 μg/kg/h, plasma levels increased linearly with increasing infusion rate. In each dose cohort, patients who failed therapy had comparable or higher plasma naloxone levels than those levels measured in patients who did not fail treatment. Plasma morphine levels ranged between 3.52 and 172 ng/mL, and >90% of levels ranged between 10.2 and 61.6 ng/mL. Plasma morphine levels were comparable between patients who failed therapy and those patients who achieved symptom control.
CONCLUSIONS: Naloxone infusion rates ≥1 μg/kg/h significantly reduced, but did not eliminate, the incidence of opioid-induced side effects in postoperative pediatric patients receiving IV patient-controlled analgesia morphine. Patients who failed therapy generally had plasma naloxone and morphine levels that were comparable to those who had good symptom relief suggesting that success or failure to ameliorate opioid-induced side effects was unrelated to plasma levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21890885      PMCID: PMC4461032          DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822c9a44

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  32 in total

1.  The effect of naloxone-3-glucuronide on colonic transit time in healthy men after acute morphine administration: a placebo-controlled double-blinded crossover preclinical volunteer study.

Authors:  P Netzer; A Sendensky; M P Wissmeyer; S Baumeler; C Batista; U Scheurer; T Krause; P Reber; R Brenneisen
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 8.171

2.  The effects of a small-dose naloxone infusion on opioid-induced side effects and analgesia in children and adolescents treated with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a double-blind, prospective, randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Lynne G Maxwell; Sandra C Kaufmann; Sally Bitzer; Eric V Jackson; John McGready; Sabine Kost-Byerly; Lori Kozlowski; Sharon K Rothman; Myron Yaster
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  A background infusion of morphine does not enhance postoperative analgesia after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Didem Dal; Meral Kanbak; Meltem Caglar; Ulku Aypar
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Ventilatory effects of morphine infusions in cyanotic versus acyanotic infants after thoracotomy.

Authors:  Anne M Lynn; Mary Kay Nespeca; Susan L Bratton; Danny D Shen
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.556

5.  Opioid-sparing effects of a low-dose infusion of naloxone in patient-administered morphine sulfate.

Authors:  T J Gan; B Ginsberg; P S Glass; J Fortney; R Jhaveri; R Perno
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Age- and therapy-related effects on morphine requirements and plasma concentrations of morphine and its metabolites in postoperative infants.

Authors:  N J Bouwmeester; J N van den Anker; W C J Hop; K J S Anand; D Tibboel
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 7.  Sex-specific responses to opiates: animal and human studies.

Authors:  Albert Dahan; Benjamin Kest; Amanda R Waxman; Elise Sarton
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  The prevalence of and risk factors for adverse events in children receiving patient-controlled analgesia by proxy or patient-controlled analgesia after surgery.

Authors:  Terri Voepel-Lewis; Annette Marinkovic; Amy Kostrzewa; Alan R Tait; Shobha Malviya
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Effect of combining naloxone and morphine for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia.

Authors:  James B Sartain; John J Barry; Christopher A Richardson; Helen C Branagan
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Morphine kinetics in children.

Authors:  B Dahlström; P Bolme; H Feychting; G Noack; L Paalzow
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 6.875

View more
  6 in total

1.  Pain management following major intracranial surgery in pediatric patients: a prospective cohort study in three academic children's hospitals.

Authors:  Lynne G Maxwell; George M Buckley; Sapna R Kudchadkar; Elizabeth Ely; Emily L Stebbins; Christine Dube; Athir Morad; Ebaa A Jastaniah; Navil F Sethna; Myron Yaster
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 2.556

2.  Development of Hydrogels for Microneedle-Assisted Transdermal Delivery of Naloxone for Opioid-Induced Pruritus.

Authors:  Xinyi Gao; Nicole K Brogden
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 3.534

3.  Enhancing recovery after minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum.

Authors:  Cristen N Litz; Sandra M Farach; Allison M Fernandez; Richard Elliott; Jenny Dolan; Will Nelson; Nebbie E Walford; Christopher Snyder; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Ernest K Amankwah; Paul D Danielson; Nicole M Chandler
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  The effect of audio therapy to treat postoperative pain in children undergoing major surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  B S Sunitha Suresh; Gildasio S De Oliveira; Santhanam Suresh
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2015-01-03       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  The Society for Pediatric Anesthesia recommendations for the use of opioids in children during the perioperative period.

Authors:  Joseph P Cravero; Rita Agarwal; Charles Berde; Patrick Birmingham; Charles J Coté; Jeffrey Galinkin; Lisa Isaac; Sabine Kost-Byerly; David Krodel; Lynne Maxwell; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Navil Sethna; Robert Wilder
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.556

6.  Preventing nausea and vomiting after gynecological laparoscopic surgery by patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with a naloxone admixture: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Haihong Yang; Xuedong Gu; Meiling Xu; Guan Yang; Yunju Rao; Liang Gao; Gu Gong; Siyi He
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.