Literature DB >> 21890830

Statistical uncertainty of mortality rates and rankings for children's hospitals.

Chris Feudtner1, Jay G Berry, Gareth Parry, Paul Hain, Rustin B Morse, Anthony D Slonim, Samir S Shah, Matt Hall.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Hospitals are being required to report publically their adjusted mortality rates, which are then being used to rank hospitals. Our objectives were to assess the statistical reliability of the determination of a hospital's adjusted mortality rate, of comparisons of that rate with the rates of other hospitals, and of the use of those rates to rank the hospitals.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 473 383 patients discharged from 42 US children's hospitals in 2008 was performed. Hospital-specific observed/expected (O/E) mortality rate ratios and corresponding hospital rankings, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), were examined.
RESULTS: Hospitals' O/E mortality rate ratios exhibited wide 95% CIs, and no hospital was clearly distinguishable from the other hospitals' aggregated mean mortality performance. Only 2 hospitals' mortality performance fell outside the comparator hospitals' 95% CI. Those hospitals' 95% CIs overlapped with the overall comparator set's 95% CI, which suggests that there were no statistically significant hospital outliers. Fourteen (33.3%) of the 42 hospitals had O/E ratios that were not statistically different from being in the 95% CI of the top 10% of hospitals. Hospital-specific mortality rate rankings displayed even broader 95% CIs; the typical hospital had a 95% CI range that spanned 22 rank-order positions.
CONCLUSION: Children's hospital-specific measures of adjusted mortality rate ratios and rankings have substantial amounts of statistical imprecision, which limits the usefulness of such measures for comparisons of quality of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21890830      PMCID: PMC3182848          DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-3074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  21 in total

1.  Impact of the New York State Cardiac Surgery and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reporting System on the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Renato A Apolito; Mark A Greenberg; Mark A Menegus; April M Lowe; Lynn A Sleeper; Mark H Goldberger; Joshua Remick; Martha J Radford; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  Mortality as a measure of quality: implications for palliative and end-of-life care.

Authors:  Robert G Holloway; Timothy E Quill
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Health-care quality registers: outcome-orientated ranking of hospitals is unreliable.

Authors:  J Ranstam; P Wagner; O Robertsson; L Lidgren
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-12

4.  ACC/AHA classification of care metrics: performance measures and quality metrics: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures.

Authors:  Robert O Bonow; Frederick A Masoudi; John S Rumsfeld; Elizabeth Delong; N A Mark Estes; David C Goff; Kathleen Grady; Lee A Green; Ann R Loth; Eric D Peterson; Ileana L Piña; Martha J Radford; David M Shahian
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Choosing the best hospital: the limitations of public quality reporting.

Authors:  Michael B Rothberg; Elizabeth Morsi; Evan M Benjamin; Penelope S Pekow; Peter K Lindenauer
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  The unintended consequences of publicly reporting quality information.

Authors:  Rachel M Werner; David A Asch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  The public health hazards of risk avoidance associated with public reporting of risk-adjusted outcomes in coronary intervention.

Authors:  Frederic S Resnic; Frederick G P Welt
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Comparison of risk adjustment methodologies in surgical quality improvement.

Authors:  Steven M Steinberg; Michael R Popa; Judith A Michalek; Matthew J Bethel; E Christopher Ellison
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 9.  Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care.

Authors:  Constance H Fung; Yee-Wei Lim; Soeren Mattke; Cheryl Damberg; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Hospital size, uncertainty, and pay-for-performance.

Authors:  Gestur Davidson; Ira Moscovice; Denise Remus
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2007
View more
  5 in total

1.  Recognizing Differences in Hospital Quality Performance for Pediatric Inpatient Care.

Authors:  Jay G Berry; Alan M Zaslavsky; Sara L Toomey; Alyna T Chien; Jisun Jang; Maria C Bryant; David J Klein; William J Kaplan; Mark A Schuster
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Identifying a quality improvement project.

Authors:  Lakshmi Katakam; Gautham K Suresh
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  Epidemiology of pediatric hospitalizations at general hospitals and freestanding children's hospitals in the United States.

Authors:  JoAnna K Leyenaar; Shawn L Ralston; Meng-Shiou Shieh; Penelope S Pekow; Rita Mangione-Smith; Peter K Lindenauer
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 2.960

4.  Development and validation of the pediatric risk estimate score for children using extracorporeal respiratory support (Ped-RESCUERS).

Authors:  Ryan P Barbaro; Philip S Boonstra; Matthew L Paden; Lloyd A Roberts; Gail M Annich; Robert H Bartlett; Frank W Moler; Matthew M Davis
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Comparing Two Proximal Measures of Unrecognized Clinical Deterioration in Children.

Authors:  Tina Sosa; Sarah Ferris; Carol Frese; Deborah Hacker; Maya Dewan; Patrick W Brady
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.960

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.