Literature DB >> 21890255

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent responsiveness and mortality in hemodialysis patients: results from a cohort study from the dialysis registry in Japan.

Shingo Fukuma1, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, Seiji Hashimoto, Shigeru Nakai, Kunitoshi Iseki, Yoshiharu Tsubakihara, Shunichi Fukuhara.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient responsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), notoriously difficult to measure, has attracted attention for its association with mortality. We defined categories of ESA responsiveness and attempted to clarify their association with mortality. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING &amp; PARTICIPANTS: Data from Japan's dialysis registry (2005-2006), including 95,460 adult hemodialysis patients who received ESAs. PREDICTOR: We defined 6 categories of ESA responsiveness based on a combination of ESA dosage (low [<6,000 U/wk] or high [≥6,000 U/wk]) and hemoglobin level (low [<10 g/dL], medium [10-11.9 g/dL], or high [≥12 g/dL]), with medium hemoglobin level and low-dose ESA therapy as the reference category. OUTCOMES: All-cause and cardiovascular mortality during 1-year follow-up. MEASUREMENTS: HRs were estimated using a Cox model for the association between responsiveness categories and mortality, adjusting for potential confounders such as age, sex, postdialysis weight, dialysis duration, comorbid conditions, serum albumin level, and transferrin saturation.
RESULTS: Median ESA dosage (4,500-5,999 U/wk) was used as a cutoff point, and mean hemoglobin level was 10.1 g/dL in our cohort. Of 95,460 patients during follow-up, 7,205 (7.5%) died of all causes, including 5,586 (5.9%) cardiovascular deaths. Low hemoglobin levels and high-dose ESA therapy were both associated with all-cause mortality (adjusted HRs, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.09-1.27] for low hemoglobin level with low-dose ESA and 1.44 [95% CI, 1.34-1.55] for medium hemoglobin level with high-dose ESA). Adjusted HRs for high-dose ESA with low hemoglobin level (hyporesponsiveness) were 1.94 (95% CI, 1.82-2.07) for all-cause and 2.02 (95% CI, 1.88-2.17) for cardiovascular mortality. We also noted the interaction between ESA dosage and hemoglobin level on all-cause mortality (likelihood ratio test, P = 0.002). LIMITATIONS: Potential residual confounding from unmeasured factors and single measurement of predictors.
CONCLUSIONS: Mortality can be affected by ESA responsiveness, which may include independent and interactive effects of ESA dose and hemoglobin level. Responsiveness category has prognostic importance and clinical relevance in anemia management.
Copyright © 2011 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21890255     DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  29 in total

1.  Dialysis: ESA responsiveness and outcomes in patients on hemodialysis.

Authors:  Steven Fishbane; Azzour Hazzan
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 28.314

2.  Levocarnitine Injections Decrease the Need for Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents in Hemodialysis Patients with Renal Anemia.

Authors:  Takashi Maruyama; Terumi Higuchi; Toshio Yamazaki; Erina Okawa; Hideyuki Ando; Osamu Oikawa; Atsushi Inoshita; Kazuyoshi Okada; Masanori Abe
Journal:  Cardiorenal Med       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 2.041

Review 3.  Anaemia management and mortality risk in chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Walter H Hörl
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 28.314

4.  Relationship between responsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agent and long-term outcomes in chronic hemodialysis patients: a single-center cohort study.

Authors:  Tetsuya Ogawa; Himiko Shimizu; Ai Kyono; Masayo Sato; Tetsuri Yamashita; Kuniaki Otsuka; Kosaku Nitta
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Early response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients.

Authors:  Michio Kuwahara; Youhei Arai; Eriko Takehara; Yasunori Sasaki; Tomoharu Yoshimine; Keita Kusaka; Satomi Shikuma; Wataru Akita; Shinichi Uchida
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.801

6.  A Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Trial of Enarodustat in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Followed by Long-Term Trial.

Authors:  Tadao Akizawa; Masaomi Nangaku; Takuhiro Yamaguchi; Masanobu Arai; Ryosuke Koretomo; Atsushi Matsui; Hideki Hirakata
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.754

7.  Intravenous Iron Replacement Therapy Improves Cardiovascular Outcomes in Hemodialysis Patients.

Authors:  Matteo Righini; Vittorio Dalmastri; Irene Capelli; Claudio Orsi; Gabriele Donati; Maria Giovanna Pallotti; Chiara Pedone; Gianni Casella; Pasquale Chieco; Gaetano LA Manna
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Erythropoietin Hyporesponsiveness in Dialysis Patients: Possible Role of Statins.

Authors:  Takeshi Hasegawa; Junhui Zhao; Douglas S Fuller; Brian Bieber; Jarcy Zee; Hal Morgenstern; Norio Hanafusa; Masaomi Nangaku
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.754

9.  Hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agent as a prognostic factor in Japanese hemodialysis patients: the Q-Cohort study.

Authors:  Rieko Eriguchi; Masatomo Taniguchi; Toshiharu Ninomiya; Hideki Hirakata; Satoru Fujimi; Kazuhiko Tsuruya; Takanari Kitazono
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 3.902

10.  A threshold trajectory was revealed by isolating the effects of hemoglobin rate of rise in anemia of chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Gregory Fusco; Ali Hariri; Carlos Vallarino; Ajay Singh; Peter Yu; Lesley Wise
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2017-07-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.