Literature DB >> 21890183

Transurethral resection of the prostate with monopolar resectoscope: single-surgeon experience and long-term results of after 3589 procedures.

Ali Ihsan Tascı1, Y O Ilbey, Volkan Tugcu, Olcay Cicekler, Cem Cevik, Fatih Zoroglu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To present our clinical outcomes and to assess the impact of technological improvements that have occurred recently in transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) on its morbidity.
METHODS: The data from the 3589 patients who underwent conventional monopolar TURP for BPH from March 2000 to December 2008 were evaluated retrospectively. Data were analyzed to obtain perioperative and postoperative complications, operative time, weight of prostate chips resected, time to catheter removal, and hospitalization time. Patients were followed at 3 months and then yearly. The follow-up included the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life score (QoL), maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max.)), and prostate-specific antigen. The significant improvements in mean the IPSS, QoL score, and Q(max.) were observed in postoperative visits.
RESULTS: Intraoperative perforation of prostatic capsule or bladder neck was observed in 27 (0.75%) patients. In the early postoperative period, clot retention with secondary bleeding was observed in 81 (2.3%) patients. Recatheterization was required in 195 (5.4%) patients. Mild to moderate dysuria was observed in 819 (23%) patients. Urinary tract infection occurred in 234 (6.5%) cases. Severe dysuria, urgency, and urge incontinence was observed in 93 (2.6%) patients in the first week after surgery. During the follow-up period, urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture occurred in 117 (3.2%) and 39 (1.08%) patients, respectively. There was no the iatrogenic incontinence. Re-operation as a result of rest prostatic adenoma was required in 158 (4.4%) patients.
CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that a technical improvement in TURP provides a lower complication rate. Conventional monopolar TURP can now be performed with excellent long-term efficacy combined with reduced complications. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21890183     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.04.072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  17 in total

Review 1.  [Urethral stricture : From diagnostics to appropriate treatment].

Authors:  F Strittmatter; V Beck; C G Stief; S Tritschler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Urethral stricture: etiology, investigation and treatments.

Authors:  Stefan Tritschler; Alexander Roosen; Claudius Füllhase; Christian G Stief; Herbert Rübben
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 3.  Evaluation and management of post-transurethral resection of the prostate lower urinary tract symptoms.

Authors:  Bilal Chughtai; Vannita Simma-Chiang; Steven A Kaplan
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  [Transurethral prostatectomy: management of complications].

Authors:  H Leyh; U Necknig
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  [Urethral strictures : From diagnostic workup to appropriate and situation-dependent treatment].

Authors:  Frank Strittmatter; Christian G Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 6.  Photoselective vaporization of the prostate with GreenLight 120-W laser versus transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ya-Chen Zang; Xin-Xi Deng; Dong-Rong Yang; Bo-Xin Xue; Li-Jun Xu; Xiao-Long Liu; Yi-Bin Zhou; Yu-Xi Shan
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Long-term results of thulium laser resection of the prostate: a prospective study at multiple centers.

Authors:  Feng Sun; Bangmin Han; Di Cui; Fujun Zhao; Xiaowen Sun; Jian Zhuo; Yifeng Jing; Haitao Liu; Shujie Xia; Yong Yang; Guangheng Luo; Fengfu Guo
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Does the Intensity of Cutting Power Affect Postoperative Symptoms During Transurethral Resection with a Monopolar System?

Authors:  Mustafa Kirac; Çagrı Guneri; Nuri Deniz; Hasan Biri
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 0.656

9.  Photoselective vaporization of the prostate with the 180-W XPS-Greenlight laser: Five-year experience of safety, efficiency, and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Khaled Ajib; Mila Mansour; Marc Zanaty; Mansour Alnazari; Pierre-Alain Hueber; Malek Meskawi; Roger Valdivieso; Come Tholomier; Benjamin Pradere; Vincent Misrai; Dean Elterman; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Superselective α-adrenergic blockers versus transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective comparison of health-related quality of life outcome after treating patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Negin Hadi; Alireza Aminsharifi; Ali Sadeghi; Ali Tourchi
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.