Literature DB >> 21890134

Couples with unexplained subfertility and unfavorable prognosis: a randomized pilot trial comparing the effectiveness of in vitro fertilization with elective single embryo transfer versus intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian stimulation.

Inge M Custers1, Tamar E König, Frank J Broekmans, Peter G A Hompes, Eugenie Kaaijk, Jur Oosterhuis, Monique H Mochtar, Sjoerd Repping, Madelon van Wely, Pieternel Steures, Fulco van der Veen, Ben W J Mol.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of IVF with elective single embryo transfer (IVF-eSET) vs. IUI with controlled ovarian stimulation (IUI-COS) as an alternative treatment to reduce the risk for a multiple pregnancy.
DESIGN: Randomized pilot trial.
SETTING: Three academic and six teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. PATIENT(S): Couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility and an unfavorable prognosis for natural conception. INTERVENTION(S): One cycle of IVF-eSET or three cycles of IUI-COS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ongoing pregnancy per couple. RESULT(S): We randomly allocated 116 women to IVF-eSET (n = 58) or IUI-COH (n = 58). There were 14 ongoing pregnancies (24%) in the IVF-eSET group and 12 pregnancies (21%) in the IUI-COS group (relative ratio 1.17; 95% confidence interval 0.60-2.30). There were two twin pregnancies in the IVF-eSET group (14%) and two twin pregnancies and one triplet pregnancy in the IUI-COH group (25%). CONCLUSION(S): In patients with unexplained or mild male subfertility and a poor prognosis for natural conception, one cycle of IVF-eSET might be as effective as three cycles of IUI-COS as primary treatment. Elective single embryo transfer does not seem an effective strategy in preventing multiple pregnancies in this particular population. In the future a strict SET policy (i.e., compulsory SET) might be an option. Our trial provides evidence for the feasibility and highlights the importance of a large definitive trial to determine the effectiveness and side effects of both strategies.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21890134     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  6 in total

1.  Effectiveness and safety of intrauterine insemination vs. assisted reproductive technology: emulating a target trial using an observational database of administrative claims.

Authors:  Yu-Han Chiu; Jennifer J Yland; Paolo Rinaudo; John Hsu; Sean McGrath; Sonia Hernández-Díaz; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 7.490

Review 2.  IVF and IUI in couples with unexplained infertility (FIIX study): study protocol of a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lucy Prentice; Lynn Sadler; Sarah Lensen; Melissa Vercoe; Jack Wilkinson; Richard Edlin; Georgina M Chambers; Cynthia M Farquhar
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-09-22

Review 3.  In vitro fertilisation for unexplained subfertility.

Authors:  Zabeena Pandian; Ahmed Gibreel; Siladitya Bhattacharya
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-19

4.  Interventions for unexplained infertility: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Nora A Danhof; Raissa I Tjon-Kon-Fat; Marinus Jc Eijkemans; Patrick Mm Bossuyt; Monique H Mochtar; Fulco van der Veen; Siladitya Bhattacharya; Ben Willem J Mol; Madelon van Wely
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-09-05

5.  Prevention of multiple pregnancies in couples with unexplained or mild male subfertility: randomised controlled trial of in vitro fertilisation with single embryo transfer or in vitro fertilisation in modified natural cycle compared with intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

Authors:  A J Bensdorp; R I Tjon-Kon-Fat; P M M Bossuyt; C A M Koks; G J E Oosterhuis; A Hoek; P G A Hompes; F J M Broekmans; H R Verhoeve; J P de Bruin; R van Golde; S Repping; B J Cohlen; M D A Lambers; P F van Bommel; E Slappendel; D Perquin; J M Smeenk; M J Pelinck; J Gianotten; D A Hoozemans; J W M Maas; M J C Eijkemans; F van der Veen; B W J Mol; M van Wely
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-01-09

6.  The Livebirth Rate Per In Vitro Fertilization Cycle Is Higher Than The Cumulative Live Birth Rates of Intrauterine Insemination for Patients of Poseidon Group 3 With Unexplained Infertility.

Authors:  Yixuan Wu; Haiying Liu; Jianqiao Liu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 5.555

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.