Literature DB >> 21889968

Social distance modulates recipient's fairness consideration in the dictator game: an ERP study.

Yin Wu1, Marijke C Leliveld, Xiaolin Zhou.   

Abstract

Previous research showed that social distance (e.g., being friends or strangers) influences people's fairness consideration and other-regarding behavior. However, it is not entirely clear how social distance influences the recipient's evaluation of (un)fair behavior. In this study, we let people play a dictator game in which they received (un)fair offers from either friends or strangers while their brain potentials were recorded. Results showed that the medial frontal negativity (MFN), a component associated with the processing of expectancy violation, was more negative-going in response to unfair than to fair offers from friends whereas it did not show differential responses to offers from strangers. The P300 was more positive for fair than for unfair offers irrespective of friends or strangers making the offers. These results suggest that violation of social norms can be detected at an early stage of evaluative processing and that this detection can be modulated by social distance.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21889968     DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  39 in total

1.  Neural correlates of adolescents' viewing of parents' and peers' emotions: Associations with risk-taking behavior and risky peer affiliations.

Authors:  Darby Saxbe; Larissa Del Piero; Mary Helen Immordino-Yang; Jonas Kaplan; Gayla Margolin
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.083

2.  Whether others were treated equally affects neural responses to unfairness in the Ultimatum Game.

Authors:  Li Zheng; Xiuyan Guo; Lei Zhu; Jianqi Li; Luguang Chen; Zoltan Dienes
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Social status modulates the neural response to unfairness.

Authors:  Jie Hu; Philip R Blue; Hongbo Yu; Xiaoliang Gong; Yang Xiang; Changjun Jiang; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Spatiotemporal neural dynamics of moral judgment: a high-density ERP study.

Authors:  Keith J Yoder; Jean Decety
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Neural responses to unfairness and fairness depend on self-contribution to the income.

Authors:  Xiuyan Guo; Li Zheng; Xuemei Cheng; Menghe Chen; Lei Zhu; Jianqi Li; Luguang Chen; Zhiliang Yang
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  You are excusable! Neural correlates of economic neediness on empathic concern and fairness perception.

Authors:  Ailian Wang; Lian Zhu; Dong Lyu; Danfeng Cai; Qingguo Ma; Jia Jin
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Effortless retaliation: the neural dynamics of interpersonal intentions in the Chicken Game using brain-computer interface.

Authors:  Yiwen Wang; Yuxiao Lin; Chao Fu; Zhihua Huang; Shaobei Xiao; Rongjun Yu
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  ERP correlates of social conformity in a line judgment task.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Yin Wu; Guangyu Tong; Xiaoming Guan; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  Social Comparison Affects Brain Responses to Fairness in Asset Division: An ERP Study with the Ultimatum Game.

Authors:  Yin Wu; Yuqin Zhou; Eric van Dijk; Marijke C Leliveld; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  More fair play in an ultimatum game after resettlement in Zimbabwe: a field experiment and a structural model.

Authors:  Stefan Kohler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.