Literature DB >> 21889862

The bacterial microbiota in the ceca of Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) differs between wild and captive birds.

Tobias Wienemann1, Dirk Schmitt-Wagner, Katja Meuser, Gernot Segelbacher, Bernhard Schink, Andreas Brune, Peter Berthold.   

Abstract

The diet of wild capercaillie differs strongly between seasons. Particularly during winter, when energy demands are high and the birds forage solely on coniferous needles, microbial fermentations in the ceca are considered to contribute significantly to the energy requirement and to the detoxification of the resinous diet. Here, we present the first cultivation-independent analysis of the bacterial community in the cecum of capercaillie, using the 16S rRNA gene as a molecular marker. Cloning and fingerprinting analyses of cecum feces show distinct differences between wild and captive birds. While certain lineages of Clostridiales, Synergistetes, and Actinobacteria are most prevalent in wild birds, they are strongly reduced in individuals raised in captivity. Most striking is the complete absence of Megasphaera and Synergistes species in captive capercaillie, which are characterized by a large abundance of Gammaproteobacteria closely related to members of the genus Anaerobiospirillum, bacteria that are commonly connected with intestinal dysfunction. The community profiles of cecum content from wild birds differed between summer and winter season, and the cecum wall may be an important site for bacterial colonization. Our results corroborate the hypothesis that the bacterial community in the ceca of tetraonid birds changes in response to their highly specialized seasonal diets. Moreover, we propose that the observed differences in community profiles between wild and captive capercaillie reflects a disturbance in the bacterial microbiota that compromises the performance of the cecum and may be responsible for the high mortality of captive birds released into nature.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21889862     DOI: 10.1016/j.syapm.2011.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 0723-2020            Impact factor:   4.022


  35 in total

Review 1.  The gut microbiome as a driver of individual variation in cognition and functional behaviour.

Authors:  Gabrielle L Davidson; Amy C Cooke; Crystal N Johnson; John L Quinn
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Promiscuity in mice is associated with increased vaginal bacterial diversity.

Authors:  Matthew David MacManes
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-10-01

3.  Highland adaptation of birds on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau via gut microbiota.

Authors:  Gang Liu; Chao Li; Yan Liu; Chang-Ming Zheng; Yu Ning; Hong-Guo Yang; Lang Suo; Xin-Zhang Qi; Hui-Xin Li; Wan-Yu Wen; Yu-Hang Wang; Hong-Yun Qi; Ping Cai; Ming-Hao Gong
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 5.560

4.  Gut Microbiome Differences in Rescued Common Kestrels (Falco tinnunculus) Before and After Captivity.

Authors:  Kangqing Zhang; Xinxiang Wang; Xiang Gong; Jinling Sui
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 6.064

Review 5.  Exploring the avian gut microbiota: current trends and future directions.

Authors:  David W Waite; Michael W Taylor
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Characterizing the avian gut microbiota: membership, driving influences, and potential function.

Authors:  David W Waite; Michael W Taylor
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Cecal bacterial communities in wild Japanese rock ptarmigans and captive Svalbard rock ptarmigans.

Authors:  Kazunari Ushida; Takahiro Segawa; Sayaka Tsuchida; Koichi Murata
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 1.267

8.  The Oral and Skin Microbiomes of Captive Komodo Dragons Are Significantly Shared with Their Habitat.

Authors:  Embriette R Hyde; Jose A Navas-Molina; Se Jin Song; Jordan G Kueneman; Gail Ackermann; Cesar Cardona; Gregory Humphrey; Don Boyer; Tom Weaver; Joseph R Mendelson; Valerie J McKenzie; Jack A Gilbert; Rob Knight
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 6.496

9.  Composition of Bacterial Assemblages in Different Components of Reed Warbler Nests and a Possible Role of Egg Incubation in Pathogen Regulation.

Authors:  Hanja B Brandl; Wouter F D van Dongen; Alžbeta Darolová; Ján Krištofík; Juraj Majtan; Herbert Hoi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  The Woodrat Gut Microbiota as an Experimental System for Understanding Microbial Metabolism of Dietary Toxins.

Authors:  Kevin D Kohl; M Denise Dearing
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.