Literature DB >> 21889857

Cervical cancer in Indigenous women: The case of Australia.

Geordan D Shannon1, Oscar H Franco, John Powles, Yue Leng, Nora Pashayan.   

Abstract

Globally, health inequities between Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations exist. The disparity in health outcomes between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians is exemplified by cervical cancer. Current evidence suggests that Indigenous women have higher age standardised incidence and mortality than non-Indigenous women when adjusted for stage at diagnosis and co-morbidities; however, there is little information pertaining to national estimates of cervical cancer in Indigenous women. In this paper we review available evidence on the difference in occurrence and case fatality of cervical cancer among Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian women. The Australian Bureau of Statistics, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, and State- or Territory-based Cancer Registries were utilised to collect surveillance data. To corroborate existing data, further available journal literature was identified through Medline and Embase. All papers selected for review were cross-referenced to identify further relevant studies. The most recent national estimate of age-standardised cervical cancer incidence rate was 16.9 and 7.1 per 100,000 women-years in Indigenous and non-Indigenous women respectively (incidence ratio 2.4). The Indigenous age-standardised mortality rate was 9.9 per 100,000 women years (95% CI 7.1-13.3), over 5 times the non-Indigenous rate. Cervical cancer incidence, in both Indigenous and non-Indigenous women, has decreased since 1991. Despite the decline, age-standardised incidence among Indigenous women is still higher than non-Indigenous women. The pattern of cervical cancer incidence and survival corroborates the health inequities that exist in Australia. Indigenous women are more likely than non-Indigenous women to develop cervical cancer and are less likely to survive it. Similar patterns exist in Indigenous populations worldwide, such as New Zealander Maoris and Canadian Aboriginals, suggesting that high rates of cervical cancer incidence and mortality may be a symptom of social and economic inequity.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21889857     DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.07.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Maturitas        ISSN: 0378-5122            Impact factor:   4.342


  8 in total

1.  A qualitative study of provider perspectives of structural barriers to cervical cancer screening among first nations women.

Authors:  Marion Maar; Ann Burchell; Julian Little; Gina Ogilvie; Alberto Severini; Jinghao Mary Yang; Ingeborg Zehbe
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct

2.  Overcoming barriers in HPV vaccination and screening programs.

Authors:  Alex Vorsters; Marc Arbyn; Marc Baay; Xavier Bosch; Silvia de Sanjosé; Sharon Hanley; Emilie Karafillakis; Pier Luigi Lopalco; Kevin G Pollock; Joanne Yarwood; Pierre Van Damme
Journal:  Papillomavirus Res       Date:  2017-07-20

3.  Strategies for Increasing Cervical Cancer Screening Amongst First Nations Communities in Northwest Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Marion Maar; Pamela Wakewich; Brianne Wood; Alberto Severini; Julian Little; Ann N Burchell; Gina Ogilvie; Ingeborg Zehbe
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2014-11-24

4.  Colonial legacy and the experience of First Nations women in cervical cancer screening: a Canadian multi-community study.

Authors:  Pamela Wakewich; Brianne Wood; Crystal Davey; Ashlie Laframboise; Ingeborg Zehbe
Journal:  Crit Public Health       Date:  2016-01-01

Review 5.  The global burden of women's cancers: a grand challenge in global health.

Authors:  Ophira Ginsburg; Freddie Bray; Michel P Coleman; Verna Vanderpuye; Alexandru Eniu; S Rani Kotha; Malabika Sarker; Tran Thanh Huong; Claudia Allemani; Allison Dvaladze; Julie Gralow; Karen Yeates; Carolyn Taylor; Nandini Oomman; Suneeta Krishnan; Richard Sullivan; Dominista Kombe; Magaly M Blas; Groesbeck Parham; Natasha Kassami; Lesong Conteh
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Using community engagement to inform and implement a community-randomized controlled trial in the anishinaabek cervical cancer screening study.

Authors:  Brianne Wood; Ann N Burchell; Nicholas Escott; Julian Little; Marion Maar; Gina Ogilvie; Alberto Severini; Lisa Bishop; Kyla Morrisseau; Ingeborg Zehbe
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  An empirical study of the 'underscreened' in organised cervical screening: experts focus on increasing opportunity as a way of reducing differences in screening rates.

Authors:  Jane H Williams; Stacy M Carter
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  Working towards a comprehensive understanding of HPV and cervical cancer among Indigenous women: a qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Sneha Sethi; Brianna Poirier; Karen Canfell; Megan Smith; Gail Garvey; Joanne Hedges; Xiangqun Ju; Lisa M Jamieson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.