Literature DB >> 21889800

Randomized, controlled trial of an educational intervention to promote spectacle use in rural China: the see well to learn well study.

Nathan Congdon1, Liping Li, Mingzhi Zhang, Amy Yang, Yang Gao, Sian Griffiths, Jiasi Wu, Abhishek Sharma, Dennis S C Lam.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test an educational intervention promoting the purchase of spectacles among Chinese children.
DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: Children in years 1 and 2 of all 20 junior and senior high schools (ages 12-17 years) in 3 rural townships in Guangdong, China.
METHODS: Children underwent visual acuity (VA) testing, and parents of participants with presenting VA worse than 6/12 in either eye improving by more than 2 lines with cycloplegic refraction were recommended to purchase glasses. Children at 10 randomly selected schools received a lecture, video, and classroom demonstration promoting spectacle purchase. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported purchase of spectacles (primary outcome) and observed wear or possession of newly purchased glasses (secondary outcome) at follow-up examinations (mean, 219 ± 87 days after the baseline visit).
RESULTS: Among 15 404 eligible children, examinations were completed for 6379 (74.6%) at intervention schools and 5044 (73.6%) at control schools. Spectacles were recommended for 2236 (35.1%) children at intervention schools and for 2212 (43.9%) at control schools. Of these, 417 (25.7%) intervention schools children and 537 (34.0%, P = 0.45) control schools children reported buying glasses. Predictors of purchase in regression models included female gender (P = 0.02), worse uncorrected VA (P < 0.001), and higher absolute value of refractive error (P = 0.001). Neither the rate of self-reported purchase of glasses or observed wear or possession of newly purchased glasses differed between control schools and intervention schools in mixed-effect logistic regression models. Among children not purchasing glasses, 21.7% had better-eye VA of worse than 6/18.
CONCLUSIONS: An intervention based on extensive pilot testing and focus groups in the area failed to promote spectacle purchase or wear. The high burden of remaining uncorrected poor vision underscores the need to develop better interventions. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21889800     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.06.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  14 in total

1.  Effect of a Local Vision Care Center on Eyeglasses Use and School Performance in Rural China: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Yue Ma; Nathan Congdon; Yaojiang Shi; Ruth Hogg; Alexis Medina; Matthew Boswell; Scott Rozelle; Mony Iyer
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 7.389

2.  Predictors of Spectacle Wear and Reasons for Nonwear in Students Randomized to Ready-made or Custom-made Spectacles: Results of Secondary Objectives From a Randomized Noninferiority Trial.

Authors:  Priya Morjaria; Jennifer Evans; Clare Gilbert
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 7.389

Review 3.  Vision screening for correctable visual acuity deficits in school-age children and adolescents.

Authors:  Jennifer R Evans; Priya Morjaria; Christine Powell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-15

4.  Prevalence and causes of visual impairment and rate of wearing spectacles in schools for children of migrant workers in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Jiangnan He; Lina Lu; Haidong Zou; Xiangui He; Qiangqiang Li; Weijie Wang; Jianfeng Zhu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Spectacle wearing in children randomised to ready-made or custom spectacles, and potential cost savings to programmes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Priya Morjaria; Kaushik Murali; Jennifer Evans; Clare Gilbert
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Effectiveness of a novel mobile health education intervention (Peek) on spectacle wear among children in India: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Priya Morjaria; Andrew Bastawrous; Gudlavalleti Venkata Satyanarayana Murthy; Jennifer Evans; Clare Gilbert
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Cluster-randomized controlled trial of the effects of free glasses on purchase of children's glasses in China: The PRICE (Potentiating Rural Investment in Children's Eyecare) study.

Authors:  Xiuqin Wang; Nathan Congdon; Yue Ma; Min Hu; Yuan Zhou; Weiqi Liao; Ling Jin; Baixiang Xiao; Xiaoyi Wu; Ming Ni; Hongmei Yi; Yiwen Huang; Beatrice Varga; Hong Zhang; Yongkang Cun; Xianshun Li; Luhua Yang; Chaoguang Liang; Wan Huang; Scott Rozelle; Xiaochen Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effect of providing free glasses on children's educational outcomes in China: cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Xiaochen Ma; Zhongqiang Zhou; Hongmei Yi; Xiaopeng Pang; Yaojiang Shi; Qianyun Chen; Mirjam E Meltzer; Saskia le Cessie; Mingguang He; Scott Rozelle; Yizhi Liu; Nathan Congdon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-09-23

9.  Interventions to improve school-based eye-care services in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anthea M Burnett; Aryati Yashadhana; Ling Lee; Nina Serova; Daveena Brain; Kovin Naidoo
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 9.408

10.  A qualitative exploration of Australian eyecare professional perspectives on Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) care.

Authors:  Isabelle Jalbert; Dian Rahardjo; Aryati Yashadhana; Gerald Liew; Bamini Gopinath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.