Literature DB >> 21889200

The comparative effects of mesoporous silica nanoparticles and colloidal silica on inflammation and apoptosis.

Soyoung Lee1, Hui-Suk Yun, Sang-Hyun Kim.   

Abstract

Mesoporous silica (MPS), synthesized via the supramolecular polymer templating method, is one of the most attractive nanomaterials for biomedical applications, such as drug delivery systems, labeling, and tissue engineering. The significant difference between MPS and general silica (colloidal silica) is the pore architectures, such as specific surface area and pore volume. The pore structures of nanomaterials have been considered to be one of the key conditions, causing nanotoxicity due to their different efficiency of cellular uptake and immune response. We first studied the influence of pore structural conditions of silica nanoparticles on both inflammation and apoptosis, in vitro and in vivo, by comparing MPS and colloidal silica, and defined underlying mechanisms of action. Both the MPS and colloidal silica nanoparticles are produced by almost similar synthetic conditions, except the use of polymer template for MPS. The specific surface area of colloidal silica and MPS was 40 and 1150 m(2) g(-1), respectively, while other conditions, including particle size (100 nm) and shape (spherical), were kept constant. In both MTT assay and FACS analysis, MPS nanoparticles showed significantly less cytotoxicity and apoptotic cell death than colloidal silica nanoparticles. MPS nanoparticles induced lower expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-6, in macrophages. The reduced inflammatory response and apoptosis elicited by MPS nanoparticles were resulting from the reduction of mitogen-activated protein kinases, nuclear factor-κB, and caspase 3. In addition, using the local lymph node assay, a standalone in vivo method for hazard identification of contact hypersensitivity, we showed that colloidal silica nanoparticles act as an immunogenic sensitizer and induce contact hypersensitivity but not MPS nanoparticles. In conclusion, the pore architecture of silica nanoparticles greatly influences their biocompatibility and should be carefully designed. The MPS nanoparticles exhibit better biocompatibility than colloidal silica and promise excellent potential usage in the field of biomedical and biotechnological applications.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21889200     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  50 in total

Review 1.  Nanoparticle Probes for the Detection of Cancer Biomarkers, Cells, and Tissues by Fluorescence.

Authors:  Alyssa B Chinen; Chenxia M Guan; Jennifer R Ferrer; Stacey N Barnaby; Timothy J Merkel; Chad A Mirkin
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Autophagy upregulation promotes macrophages to escape mesoporous silica nanoparticle (MSN)-induced NF-κB-dependent inflammation.

Authors:  Chen Xi; Jie Zhou; Shuzhang Du; Shaojun Peng
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.575

3.  Ordered nanoporous silica as carriers for improved delivery of water insoluble drugs: a comparative study between three dimensional and two dimensional macroporous silica.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Qinfu Zhao; Yanchen Hu; Lizhang Sun; Ling Bai; Tongying Jiang; Siling Wang
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2013-10-22

Review 4.  Understanding engineered nanomaterial skin interactions and the modulatory effects of ultraviolet radiation skin exposure.

Authors:  Samreen Jatana; Lisa A DeLouise
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2013-10-03

5.  Surface area- and mass-based comparison of fine and ultrafine nickel oxide lung toxicity and augmentation of allergic response in an ovalbumin asthma model.

Authors:  Katherine A Roach; Stacey E Anderson; Aleksandr B Stefaniak; Hillary L Shane; Vamsi Kodali; Michael Kashon; Jenny R Roberts
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 2.724

6.  Global gene expression analysis of macrophage response induced by nonporous and porous silica nanoparticles.

Authors:  Mostafa Yazdimamaghani; Philip J Moos; Hamidreza Ghandehari
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 5.307

Review 7.  Metal nanomaterials: Immune effects and implications of physicochemical properties on sensitization, elicitation, and exacerbation of allergic disease.

Authors:  Katherine A Roach; Aleksandr B Stefaniak; Jenny R Roberts
Journal:  J Immunotoxicol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.000

8.  Combined Action of Human Commensal Bacteria and Amorphous Silica Nanoparticles on the Viability and Immune Responses of Dendritic Cells.

Authors:  Giulia Malachin; Elisa Lubian; Fabrizio Mancin; Emanuele Papini; Regina Tavano
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2017-10-05

9.  Neurotoxic effects of bisphenol AF on calcium-induced ROS and MAPKs.

Authors:  Soyoung Lee; Yoo Kyeong Kim; Tae-Yong Shin; Sang-Hyun Kim
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.911

10.  Kinetics of silica nanoparticles in the human placenta.

Authors:  Marie Sønnegaard Poulsen; Tina Mose; Lisa Leth Maroun; Line Mathiesen; Lisbeth Ehlert Knudsen; Erik Rytting
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 5.913

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.