Literature DB >> 21889088

Atypical orthodontic extraction pattern managed by differential en-masse retraction against a temporary skeletal anchorage device in the treatment of bimaxillary protrusion.

Kyu-Rhim Chung1, HyeRan Choo, Jin-Hwa Lee, Seong-Hun Kim.   

Abstract

This report introduces an innovative treatment approach of selecting atypical and unconventional teeth for orthodontic extraction without compromising the quality of treatment outcomes by using temporary skeletal anchorage devices in patients with bimaxillary protrusion. Both patients introduced in this report had solid Class I molar relationships with bimaxillary anterior protrusion without facial or dental midline asymmetry. Their chief concerns were significant facial convexity, which conventionally requires the extraction of all 4 first premolars. However, 3 second premolars and 1 first premolar were removed in the first patient, and 2 second premolars and 2 first premolars were removed in the second patient. All second premolars extracted had previously had root canal treatment and large prosthodontic restorations, which resulted in a compromised short lifespan of the teeth relative to the natural dentition. To manage these cases of asymmetric extraction space in a symmetric dental and skeletal environment, 2 mini-implants were placed in the posterior maxillary interradicular spaces, 1 on each side. Despite the unusual asymmetric extraction of teeth, superimposition of the pretreatment and posttreatment cephalometric tracings shows excellent treatment outcomes of facial convexity reduction by asymetric maximum retraction of the anterior teeth with no change in the molar relationships.
Copyright © 2011 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21889088     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.08.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  7 in total

1.  Finite element study of controlling factors of anterior intrusion and torque during Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Device (TSAD) dependent en masse retraction without posterior appliances: Biocreative hybrid retractor (CH-retractor).

Authors:  Sung-Seo Mo; Min-Ki Noh; Seong-Hun Kim; Kyu-Rhim Chung; Gerald Nelson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  In Vivo Comparison of the Efficiency of En-Masse Retraction Using Temporary Anchorage Devices With and Without Orthodontic Appliances on the Posterior Teeth.

Authors:  Sanjam Oswal; Sonali V Deshmukh; Sanket S Agarkar; Sachin Durkar; Chaitra Mastud; Jayesh S Rahalkar
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2022-06

3.  Severe skeletal bimaxillary protrusion treated with micro-implants and a self-made four-curvature torquing auxiliary: A case report.

Authors:  Rui Liu; Wan-Bang Hou; Ping-Zhu Yang; Lin Zhu; Yong-Quan Zhou; Xia Yu; Xiu-Jie Wen
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 1.337

4.  SURGICAL AND ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT METHODS IN PATIENTS WITH BIMAXILLARY PROTRUSION - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.

Authors:  O K Ogundipe; O D Otuyemi
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

5.  En-masse retraction with a preformed nickel-titanium and stainless steel archwire assembly and temporary skeletal anchorage devices without posterior bonding.

Authors:  Jeong-Hyun Jee; Hyo-Won Ahn; Kyung-Won Seo; Seong-Hun Kim; Yoon-Ah Kook; Kyu-Rhim Chung; Gerald Nelson
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 1.372

6.  Class I malocclusion with severe double protrusion treated with first premolars extraction.

Authors:  Ricardo Moresca
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 May-Jun

7.  Effects of force magnitude on torque control in the correction of bimaxillary protrusion with mass retraction.

Authors:  Jiao Li; Yunhe Zhao; Houxuan Li; Huang Li; Lang Lei
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2018-06-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.