Literature DB >> 21888521

Group size and its effects on collective organization.

Anna Dornhaus1, Scott Powell, Sarah Bengston.   

Abstract

Many insects and arthropods live in colonies or aggregations of varying size. Group size may affect collective organization either because the same individual behavior has different consequences when displayed in a larger group or because larger groups are subject to different constraints and selection pressures than smaller groups. In eusocial colonies, group size may have similar effects on colony traits as body size has on organismal traits. Social insects may, therefore, be useful to test theories about general principles of scaling, as they constitute a distinct level of organization. However, there is a surprising lack of data on group sizes in social insects and other group-living arthropods, and multiple confounding factors have to be controlled to detect effects of group size. If such rigorous studies are performed, group size may become as important to understanding collective organization as is body size in explaining behavior and life history of individual organisms.
Copyright © 2012 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21888521     DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-120710-100604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol        ISSN: 0066-4170            Impact factor:   19.686


  34 in total

1.  Towards a general life-history model of the superorganism: predicting the survival, growth and reproduction of ant societies.

Authors:  Jonathan Z Shik; Chen Hou; Adam Kay; Michael Kaspari; James F Gillooly
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Personality composition is more important than group size in determining collective foraging behaviour in the wild.

Authors:  Carl N Keiser; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Task switching is associated with temporal delays in Temnothorax rugatulus ants.

Authors:  Gavin M Leighton; Daniel Charbonneau; Anna Dornhaus
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 2.671

4.  Differentiating causality and correlation in allometric scaling: ant colony size drives metabolic hypometry.

Authors:  James S Waters; Alison Ochs; Jennifer H Fewell; Jon F Harrison
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Ants work harder during consensus decision-making in small groups.

Authors:  Adam L Cronin; Martin C Stumpe
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Fitness costs of worker specialization for ant societies.

Authors:  Evelien Jongepier; Susanne Foitzik
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Sources of intraspecific variation in the collective tempo and synchrony of ant societies.

Authors:  Grant Navid Doering; Kirsten A Sheehy; James L L Lichtenstein; Brian Drawert; Linda R Petzold; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2019-08-11       Impact factor: 2.671

8.  An evolutionary ecology of individual differences.

Authors:  Sasha R X Dall; Alison M Bell; Daniel I Bolnick; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 9.492

9.  Geographic variation in caste ratio of trematode colonies with a division of labour reflect local adaptation.

Authors:  Melanie M Lloyd; Robert Poulin
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 2.289

10.  Ant larvae regulate worker foraging behavior and ovarian activity in a dose-dependent manner.

Authors:  Yuko Ulrich; Dominic Burns; Romain Libbrecht; Daniel J C Kronauer
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.