Literature DB >> 21886545

Kinematic Analysis of Six Different Insertion Sites for FDS Opponensplasty.

Martin C Skie, Thomas Parent, Kenneth Mudge, Qiang Dai.   

Abstract

Six variations of opponensplasty were biomechanically studied to determine if there is a significant difference in the amount of opposition produced by altering the insertion site of the tendon transfer while keeping the tendon source and pulley location constant. Five cadaveric arms were used to simulate six described insertion sites for opponensplasty tendon transfers. The arms were mounted through the ulna onto a specially designed stand. The stand was equipped with a calibrated stylus which could be turned 90° in order to accurately measure points in X, Y, and Z planes. Metacarpal-phalangeal flexion and thumb abduction were measured before and after application of a 550-g load. Axial rotation (pronation) was mathematically calculated using reference points on the thumb which were measured with the stylus before and after application of the load. The Bunnell transfer insertion site provided the greatest amount of palmar abduction, the Brand transfer insertion site the greatest metacarpophalangeal flexion, and the Royle transfer insertion site the greatest rotation. Although each of these transfers produced the greatest motion in one plane, they performed relatively poorly in the other two. The Riordan transfer insertion site into the extensor pollicis longus in line with the abductor pollicis brevis was, in our study, the overall best transfer, providing the second greatest change in motion in each of the three planes measured.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Insertion sites for FDS; Kinematic analysis; Opponensplasty

Year:  2009        PMID: 21886545      PMCID: PMC2920388          DOI: 10.1007/s11552-009-9248-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hand (N Y)        ISSN: 1558-9447


  6 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of thumb opposition transfer insertion sites.

Authors:  S S Roach; W H Short; F W Werner; M D Fortino
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.230

2.  Tendon transfers for thumb opposition: a biomechanical study of pulley location and two insertion sites.

Authors:  Donald H Lee; Jean E Oakes; Randolph J Ferlic
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 3.  Opposition of the thumb.

Authors:  R M Curtis
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 2.472

4.  Opposition of the thumb: an anatomic and biomechanical study of tendon transfers.

Authors:  W P Cooney; R L Linscheid; K N An
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.230

5.  Tendon transfers in hand surgery.

Authors:  D C Riordan
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 2.230

6.  Primary restoration of thumb opposition with median nerve decompression.

Authors:  J W Littler; C S Li
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 4.730

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Opponensplasty for Low Median Palsy: A Cadaver Study.

Authors:  Maki Iwase; Yusuke Matsuura; Kazuki Kuniyoshi; Takane Suzuki; Kengo Nagashima; Seiji Ohtori
Journal:  J Hand Surg Glob Online       Date:  2021-01-17

2.  Modified Camitz versus BRAND Procedures for the Treatment of Severe Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Comparative Trial Study.

Authors:  Mohammad Dehghani; Behrooz Fadaei; Shirvan Rastegar; Abolghasem Zarezadeh; Keyvan Ghadimi; Roham Nikkhah; Sepehr Eslami
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2020-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.