Nitrogen (N) limits the productivity of many ecosystems worldwide, thereby restricting the ability of terrestrial ecosystems to offset the effects of rising atmospheric CO(2) emissions naturally. Understanding input pathways of bioavailable N is therefore paramount for predicting carbon (C) storage on land, particularly in temperate and boreal forests. Paradigms of nutrient cycling and limitation posit that new N enters terrestrial ecosystems solely from the atmosphere. Here we show that bedrock comprises a hitherto overlooked source of ecologically available N to forests. We report that the N content of soils and forest foliage on N-rich metasedimentary rocks (350-950 mg N kg(-1)) is elevated by more than 50% compared with similar temperate forest sites underlain by N-poor igneous parent material (30-70 mg N kg(-1)). Natural abundance N isotopes attribute this difference to rock-derived N: (15)N/(14)N values for rock, soils and plants are indistinguishable in sites underlain by N-rich lithology, in marked contrast to sites on N-poor substrates. Furthermore, forests associated with N-rich parent material contain on average 42% more carbon in above-ground tree biomass and 60% more carbon in the upper 30 cm of the soil than similar sites underlain by N-poor rocks. Our results raise the possibility that bedrock N input may represent an important and overlooked component of ecosystem N and C cycling elsewhere.
Nitrogen (N) limits the productivity of many ecosystems worldwide, thereby restricting the ability of terrestrial ecosystems to offset the effects of rising atmospheric n class="Chemical">CO(2) emissions naturally. Understanding input pathways of bioavailable N is therefore paramount for predicting carbon (C) storage on land, particularly in temperate and boreal forests. Paradigms of nutrient cycling and limitation posit that new N enters terrestrial ecosystems solely from the atmosphere. Here we show that bedrock comprises a hitherto overlooked source of ecologically available N to forests. We report that the N content of soils and forest foliage on N-rich metasedimentary rocks (350-950 mg N kg(-1)) is elevated by more than 50% compared with similar temperate forest sites underlain by N-poor igneous parent material (30-70 mg N kg(-1)). Natural abundance N isotopes attribute this difference to rock-derived N: (15)N/(14)N values for rock, soils and plants are indistinguishable in sites underlain by N-rich lithology, in marked contrast to sites on N-poor substrates. Furthermore, forests associated with N-rich parent material contain on average 42% more carbon in above-ground tree biomass and 60% more carbon in the upper 30 cm of the soil than similar sites underlain by N-poor rocks. Our results raise the possibility that bedrock N input may represent an important and overlooked component of ecosystem N and C cycling elsewhere.
Authors: Michelle A Walvoord; Fred M Phillips; David A Stonestrom; R Dave Evans; Peter C Hartsough; Brent D Newman; Robert G Striegl Journal: Science Date: 2003-11-07 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Federico Magnani; Maurizio Mencuccini; Marco Borghetti; Paul Berbigier; Frank Berninger; Sylvain Delzon; Achim Grelle; Pertti Hari; Paul G Jarvis; Pasi Kolari; Andrew S Kowalski; Harry Lankreijer; Beverly E Law; Anders Lindroth; Denis Loustau; Giovanni Manca; John B Moncrieff; Mark Rayment; Vanessa Tedeschi; Riccardo Valentini; John Grace Journal: Nature Date: 2007-06-14 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: R Oren; D S Ellsworth; K H Johnsen; N Phillips; B E Ewers; C Maier; K V Schäfer; H McCarthy; G Hendrey; S G McNulty; G G Katul Journal: Nature Date: 2001-05-24 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Wim de Vries; Svein Solberg; Matthias Dobbertin; Hubert Sterba; Daniel Laubhahn; Gert Jan Reinds; Gert-Jan Nabuurs; Per Gundersen; Mark A Sutton Journal: Nature Date: 2008-02-14 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Peter M Vitousek; Duncan N L Menge; Sasha C Reed; Cory C Cleveland Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2013-05-27 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo; Fernando T Maestre; Antonio Gallardo; Matthew A Bowker; Matthew D Wallenstein; Jose Luis Quero; Victoria Ochoa; Beatriz Gozalo; Miguel García-Gómez; Santiago Soliveres; Pablo García-Palacios; Miguel Berdugo; Enrique Valencia; Cristina Escolar; Tulio Arredondo; Claudia Barraza-Zepeda; Donaldo Bran; José Antonio Carreira; Mohamed Chaieb; Abel A Conceição; Mchich Derak; David J Eldridge; Adrián Escudero; Carlos I Espinosa; Juan Gaitán; M Gabriel Gatica; Susana Gómez-González; Elizabeth Guzman; Julio R Gutiérrez; Adriana Florentino; Estela Hepper; Rosa M Hernández; Elisabeth Huber-Sannwald; Mohammad Jankju; Jushan Liu; Rebecca L Mau; Maria Miriti; Jorge Monerris; Kamal Naseri; Zouhaier Noumi; Vicente Polo; Aníbal Prina; Eduardo Pucheta; Elizabeth Ramírez; David A Ramírez-Collantes; Roberto Romão; Matthew Tighe; Duilio Torres; Cristian Torres-Díaz; Eugene D Ungar; James Val; Wanyoike Wamiti; Deli Wang; Eli Zaady Journal: Nature Date: 2013-10-31 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Emily Kyker-Snowman; Danica L Lombardozzi; Gordon B Bonan; Susan J Cheng; Jeffrey S Dukes; Serita D Frey; Elin M Jacobs; Risa McNellis; Joshua M Rady; Nicholas G Smith; R Quinn Thomas; William R Wieder; A Stuart Grandy Journal: Glob Chang Biol Date: 2021-10-14 Impact factor: 13.211
Authors: Cory C Cleveland; Benjamin Z Houlton; W Kolby Smith; Alison R Marklein; Sasha C Reed; William Parton; Stephen J Del Grosso; Steven W Running Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-07-16 Impact factor: 11.205