Literature DB >> 21885961

Accuracy of Microlife WatchBP Office ABI monitor assessed according to the 2002 European Society of Hypertension protocol and the British Hypertension Society protocol.

Francesca Saladini1, Elisabetta Benetti, Serena Masiero, Paolo Palatini.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of the WatchBP Office ABI monitor for blood pressure measurement developed by the Microlife Company.
METHODS: The device accuracy was tested in 85 subjects with a mean age of 54 ± 19 years. Their systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) at entry was 141 ± 30/86 ± 19 mmHg, and upper arm circumference was 28 ± 5 cm. Initially, the data from 33 participants were examined according to the 2002 version of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) protocol. An additional 52 subjects were then enrolled to fulfill the requirements of the British Hypertension Society (BHS) protocol. In all participants, sequential same arm measurements were performed by two trained observers.
RESULTS: The device passed all three phases of the ESH protocol for SBP and DBP. For the BHS protocol the device was graded A for both SBP and DBP. The A/A grade was achieved in the low blood pressure category (< 130/80 mmHg), the B/A grade in the medium category (130-160/80-100 mmHg) and the A/A grade in the high category (> 160/100 mmHg). Mean blood pressure difference between device and observers in the first 33 subjects was -0.9 ± 5.5 mmHg for SBP and -2.2 ± 4.5 mmHg for DBP and in the 85 participants it was -1.2 ± 6.5 mmHg and -2.3 ± 5.1, respectively.
CONCLUSION: These data show that the Microlife WatchBP Office ABI monitor satisfied the recommended ESH accuracy levels and achieved A/A grade of the BHS protocol across a wide range of BP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21885961     DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32834af72e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Press Monit        ISSN: 1359-5237            Impact factor:   1.444


  10 in total

1.  Practical Suitability of a Stand-Alone Oscillometric Central Blood Pressure Monitor: A Review of the Microlife WatchBP Office Central.

Authors:  Willem J Verberk; Hao-Min Cheng; Li-Chih Huang; Chia-Ming Lin; Yao-Pin Teng; Chen-Huan Chen
Journal:  Pulse (Basel)       Date:  2016-02-12

2.  Cohort Profile: The PROspective Québec (PROQ) Study on Work and Health.

Authors:  Xavier Trudel; Mahée Gilbert-Ouimet; Alain Milot; Caroline S Duchaine; Michel Vézina; Danielle Laurin; Hélène Sultan-Taïeb; Chantal Brisson
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Interankle Systolic Blood Pressure Difference Is a Marker of Prevalent Stroke in Chinese Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Hong Guo; Fengyu Sun; Haiyu Zhang; Lihang Dong; Xingbo Gu; Ye Tian
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Association between C reactive protein and microvascular and macrovascular dysfunction in sub-Saharan Africans with and without diabetes: the RODAM study.

Authors:  Charles Frederick Hayfron-Benjamin; Anke H Maitland-van der Zee; Bert-Jan van den Born; Albert G B Amoah; Karlijn A C Meeks; Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch; Matthias B Schulze; Joachim Spranger; Ina Danquah; Liam Smeeth; Erik J A J Beune; Frank Mockenhaupt; Charles O Agyemang
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2020-07

5.  Clinical relevance of double-arm blood pressure measurement and prevalence of clinically important inter-arm blood pressure differences in Indian primary care.

Authors:  Gurpreet S Wander; Sinead T J McDonagh; M Srinivasa Rao; R Alagesan; J C Mohan; Ajit Bhagwat; A K Pancholia; M Viswanathan; Manoj Bhavrilal Chopda; A Purnanand; P L N Kapardhi; Arun R Vadavi; R Selvaraj; Pankaj Aneja; Suhas Hardas; Neil Bordoloi; N Sivakadaksham; Nilesh Goswami; Christopher E Clark; Willem J Verberk
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2022-07-10       Impact factor: 2.885

6.  Simultaneous compared with sequential blood pressure measurement results in smaller inter-arm blood pressure differences.

Authors:  Niels V van der Hoeven; Sophie Lodestijn; Stephanie Nanninga; Gert A van Montfrans; Bert-Jan H van den Born
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Automated pulse wave velocity assessment using a professional oscillometric office blood pressure monitor.

Authors:  Anastasios Kollias; Konstantinos G Kyriakoulis; Areti Gravvani; Ioannis Anagnostopoulos; George S Stergiou
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Inflammation and its associations with aortic stiffness, coronary artery disease and peripheral artery disease in different ethnic groups: The HELIUS Study.

Authors:  Charles F Hayfron-Benjamin; Charlotte Mosterd; Anke H Maitland-van der Zee; Daniel H van Raalte; Albert G B Amoah; Charles Agyemang; Bert-Jan van den Born
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-07-07

9.  The Association of Four-Limb Blood Pressure with History of Stroke in Chinese Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Hong Guo; Fengyu Sun; Lihang Dong; Huiying Chang; Xingbo Gu; Haiyu Zhang; Lijiang Sheng; Ye Tian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Estimation of Cardiovascular Risk Predictors from Non-Invasively Measured Diametric Pulse Volume Waveforms via Multiple Measurement Information Fusion.

Authors:  Zahra Ghasemi; Jong Chan Lee; Chang-Sei Kim; Hao-Min Cheng; Shih-Hsien Sung; Chen-Huan Chen; Ramakrishna Mukkamala; Jin-Oh Hahn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.