Literature DB >> 21885892

Step counts and energy expenditure as estimated by pedometry during treadmill walking at different stride frequencies.

Rishann Nielson1, Pat R Vehrs, Gilbert W Fellingham, Ronald Hager, Keven A Prusak.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purposes of this study were to determine the accuracy and reliability of step counts and energy expenditure as estimated by a pedometer during treadmill walking and to clarify the relationship between step counts and current physical activity recommendations.
METHODS: One hundred males (n = 50) and females (n = 50) walked at stride frequencies (SF) of 80, 90, 100, 110, and 120 steps/min, during which time step counts and energy expenditure were estimated with a Walk4Life Elite pedometer.
RESULTS: The pedometer accurately measured step counts at SFs of 100, 110, and 120 steps/min, but not 80 and 90 steps/min. Compared with energy expenditure as measured by a metabolic cart, the pedometer significantly underestimated energy expenditure at 80 steps/min and significantly overestimated measured energy expenditure at 90, 100, 110, and 120 steps/min.
CONCLUSIONS: The pedometers' inability to accurately estimate energy expenditure cannot be attributed to stride length entered into the pedometer or its ability to measure step counts. Males met 3 criteria and females met 2 criteria for moderate-intensity physical activity at SF of 110 to 120 steps/min. These results provide the basis for defining moderate-intensity physical activity based on energy expenditure and step counts and may lead to an appropriate steps/day recommendation.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21885892     DOI: 10.1123/jpah.8.7.1004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Act Health        ISSN: 1543-3080


  8 in total

1.  A New Whole Room Indirect Calorimeter for Measurement of the Energetics of Exercise.

Authors:  Russell Rising; Kathryn Whyte; Jeanine Albu; Xavier Pi-Sunyer
Journal:  J Exerc Physiol Online       Date:  2016-12

Review 2.  Toward Harmonized Treadmill-Based Validation of Step-Counting Wearable Technologies: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Christopher C Moore; Aston K McCullough; Elroy J Aguiar; Scott W Ducharme; Catrine Tudor-Locke
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2020-07-11

3.  Congruence and trajectories of device-measured and self-reported physical activity during therapy for early breast cancer.

Authors:  H Helbrich; M Braun; C Hanusch; G Mueller; H Falk; R Flondor; N Harbeck; K Hermelink; R Wuerstlein; S Keim; F Neufeld; S Steins-Loeber; K Haertl
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Physical Activity Assessment Between Consumer- and Research-Grade Accelerometers: A Comparative Study in Free-Living Conditions.

Authors:  Gregory M Dominick; Kyle N Winfree; Ryan T Pohlig; Mia A Papas
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 5.  Walking Cadence to Exercise at Moderate Intensity for Adults: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  J Slaght; M Sénéchal; T J Hrubeniuk; A Mayo; D R Bouchard
Journal:  J Sports Med (Hindawi Publ Corp)       Date:  2017-03-28

Review 6.  How fast is fast enough? Walking cadence (steps/min) as a practical estimate of intensity in adults: a narrative review.

Authors:  Catrine Tudor-Locke; Ho Han; Elroy J Aguiar; Tiago V Barreira; John M Schuna; Minsoo Kang; David A Rowe
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 13.800

7.  How Are Wearable Activity Trackers Adopted in Older Adults? Comparison between Subjective Adoption Attitudes and Physical Activity Performance.

Authors:  Byung Cheol Lee; Junfei Xie; Toyin Ajisafe; Sung-Hee Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Walking on Water-A Natural Experiment of a Population Health Intervention to Promote Physical Activity after the Winter Holidays.

Authors:  Jonathan McGavock; Nicole Brunton; Nika Klaprat; Anders Swanson; Dave Pancoe; Ed Manley; Ashini Weerasinghe; Gillian L Booth; Kelly Russell; Laura Rosella; Erin Hobin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.