Literature DB >> 21885886

Feasibility of institutional registry-based recruitment for enrolling newly diagnosed breast cancer patients in an exercise trial.

Lisa A Cadmus Bertram1, Gina Chung, Herbert Yu, Peter Salovey, Melinda Irwin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of using a tumor registry to recruit newly diagnosed survivors into a randomized controlled exercise trial and to discuss issues related to this recruitment strategy.
METHODS: A tumor registry-based rapid ascertainment system was used to recruit breast cancer survivors into a 6-month home-based, telephone-administered intervention of moderate-to-vigorous intensity exercise or a usual care group.
RESULTS: 468 newly diagnosed cases were identified. Of these, 50 women (15.4% of those for which screening calls were made) were enrolled in the study. Women were randomized, on average, 11 weeks after diagnosis (SD = 4.8). Sixty-four percent were randomized before beginning treatment or within the first week of treatment. Time required to obtain physician consent was the primary determinant of diagnosis-to-randomization latency. Enrolled women were more likely than nonenrolled women to be non-Hispanic White and to have a college degree (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: Tumor registries present a feasible means of recruiting breast cancer survivors before or early in adjuvant treatment. The success of recruiting survivors promptly after diagnosis is largely dependent on ability to rapidly obtain physician consent. Specific effort is needed to counteract self-selection effects that may lead to under-representation of minorities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21885886     DOI: 10.1123/jpah.8.7.955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Act Health        ISSN: 1543-3080


  7 in total

1.  University of Hawai'i Cancer Center connection: The vital role of cancer registries in the recruitment of an understudied minority population into a breast cancer study: Breast Cancer Risk Model for the Pacific.

Authors:  Rachael T Leon Guerrero; Grazyna Badowski; Alisha Yamanaka; Michelle Blas-Laguana; Renata Bordallo; Arielle Buyum; Lynne Wilkens; Rachel Novotny
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2014-10

2.  Using registries to recruit subjects for clinical trials.

Authors:  Meng H Tan; Matthew Thomas; Mark P MacEachern
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Recruitment and retention of African American and Hispanic girls and women in research.

Authors:  Debra C Wallace; Robin Bartlett
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 1.462

4.  Representativeness of two sampling procedures for an internet intervention targeting cancer-related distress: a comparison of convenience and registry samples.

Authors:  Jason E Owen; Erin O'Carroll Bantum; Kevin Criswell; Julie Bazzo; Amanda Gorlick; Annette L Stanton
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2013-05-04

5.  Effectiveness and Cost of Recruiting Participants to a Research Registry Using an Emergency Department Research Associate Program.

Authors:  Carrie Dykes; Joseph Glick; Beau Abar; Ann Dozier
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 4.689

6.  Early experience with an opt-in research register - Scottish Health Research Register (SHARE): a multi-method evaluation of participant recruitment performance.

Authors:  Wen Shi; Shobna Vasishta; Louise Dow; Daniella Cavellini; Colin Palmer; Brian McKinstry; Frank Sullivan
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Recruitment of young adult cancer survivors into a randomized controlled trial of an mHealth physical activity intervention.

Authors:  Carmina G Valle; Lindsey N Camp; Molly Diamond; Brooke T Nezami; Jessica Gokee LaRose; Bernardine M Pinto; Deborah F Tate
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 2.728

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.