Literature DB >> 2188579

Interactions between the brain and the immune system.

R Ader1, D Felten, N Cohen.   

Abstract

The observations and research described in this communication derive from a nontraditional view of the immune system. It has become abundantly clear that there are probably no organ systems or homeostatic defense mechanisms that are not, in vivo, subject to the influence of interactions between behavioral and physiological events. The complex mechanisms underlying these interactions and their relationship to health and illness, however, are imperfectly understood. The most imperfectly understood, perhaps, are the interrelationships among brain, behavior, and immune processes. Without attempting to cover all the literature, we have used stress effects and conditioning phenomena as illustrations to point out that behavior can influence immune function. We have also described data indicating that the immune system can receive and respond to neural and endocrine signals. Conversely, behavioral, neural, and endocrine responses seem to be influenced by an activated immune system. Thus, a traditional view of immune function that is confined to cellular interactions occurring within lymphoid tissues is insufficient to account for changes in immunity observed in subhuman animals and man under real world conditions. These data question seriously the notion of an autonomous immune system. Most of the research on the regulation of immune responses has been predicated on the assumption that such regulation is accomplished by the interacting components of the immune system itself, e.g. interactions among helper and suppressor T-lymphocytes, B-cells, and accessory cells that can result in the production of antibody and effector T cells. The immune system is, indeed, capable of considerable self-regulation, and immune responses can be made to take place in vitro. The functions of that component of adaptive processes known as the immune system that are of ultimate concern, however, are those that take place in vivo. There are now compelling reasons to believe that in vivo immunoregularity processes influence and are influenced by the neuroendocrine environment in which such processes actually take place--an environment that, on the one hand, can generate signals that resting and/or activated leukocytes can receive, and, on the other hand, is exquisitely sensitive to the individual's perception of and capacity to adapt to the demands of the environment. The immune system appears to be modulated, not only by feedback mechanisms mediated through neural and endocrine processes, but by feedforward mechanisms as well. The immunologic effects of learning, an essential feedforward mechanism, suggest that, like direct neural and endocrine processes, behavior can, under appropriate circumstances, serve an immunoregulatory function in vivo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2188579     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pa.30.040190.003021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol        ISSN: 0362-1642            Impact factor:   13.820


  34 in total

1.  Dopamine D2 receptor polymorphisms in inflammatory bowel disease and the refractory response to treatment.

Authors:  F Magro; E Cunha; F Araujo; E Meireles; P Pereira; M Dinis-Ribeiro; F Tavarela Veloso; R Medeiros; P Soares-da-Silva
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Immunology and neurology.

Authors:  Eilhard Mix; Robert Goertsches; Uwe K Zettl
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Social stress in groups of mice: methods for recording conflicts and their consequences.

Authors:  Yu N Korystov; A V Kulikov; L V Arkhipova; G N Smirnova; V V Shaposhnikova; M Kh Levitman; L M Chailakhyan
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2003 May-Jun

4.  Multiple nitric oxide synthase systems in adult rat thymus revealed using NADPH diaphorase histochemistry.

Authors:  J E Downing
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 7.397

5.  The impact of a new emotional self-management program on stress, emotions, heart rate variability, DHEA and cortisol.

Authors:  R McCraty; B Barrios-Choplin; D Rozman; M Atkinson; A D Watkins
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  1998 Apr-Jun

6.  Lateralization and stress responses in mice: interindividual differences in the association of brain, neuroendocrine, and immune responses.

Authors:  P J Neveu
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.805

Review 7.  The immune system and hypertension.

Authors:  Madhu V Singh; Mark W Chapleau; Sailesh C Harwani; Francois M Abboud
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.829

8.  Sympathetic nervous system control of anti-influenza CD8+ T cell responses.

Authors:  Kristie M Grebe; Heather D Hickman; Kari R Irvine; Kazuyo Takeda; Jack R Bennink; Jonathan W Yewdell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Essentials of psychotherapeutic intervention for cancer patients.

Authors:  D Spiegel
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  An analysis of peripheral type benzodiazepine receptors on blood mononuclear cells during high dose steroid treatment of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  P Ferrero; P Rocca; P Benna; C De Leo; E Montalenti; L Ravizza; B Bergamasco
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1992-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.