BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Deep brain stimulation of the thalamus has become a valuable treatment for medication-refractory essential tremor, but current targeting provides only a limited ability to account for individual anatomic variability. We examined whether functional connectivity measurements among the motor cortex, superior cerebellum, and thalamus would allow discrimination of precise targets useful for image guidance of neurostimulator placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Resting BOLD images (8 minutes) were obtained in 58 healthy adolescent and adult volunteers. Regions of interest were identified from an anatomic atlas and a finger movement task in each subject in the primary motor cortex and motor activation region of the bilateral superior cerebellum. Correlation was measured in the time series of each thalamic voxel with the 4 seeds. An analogous procedure was performed on a single subject imaged for 10 hours to constrain the time needed for single-subject optimization of thalamic targets. RESULTS: Mean connectivity images from 58 subjects showed precisely localized targets within the expected location of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus, within a single voxel of currently used deep brain stimulation anatomic targets. These targets could be mapped with single-voxel accuracy in a single subject with 3 hours of imaging time, though targets were reproduced in different locations for the individual than for the group averages. CONCLUSIONS: Interindividual variability likely exists in optimal placement for thalamic deep brain stimulation targeting of the cerebellar thalamus for essential tremor. Individualized thalamic targets can be precisely estimated for image guidance with sufficient imaging time.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Deep brain stimulation of the thalamus has become a valuable treatment for medication-refractory essential tremor, but current targeting provides only a limited ability to account for individual anatomic variability. We examined whether functional connectivity measurements among the motor cortex, superior cerebellum, and thalamus would allow discrimination of precise targets useful for image guidance of neurostimulator placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Resting BOLD images (8 minutes) were obtained in 58 healthy adolescent and adult volunteers. Regions of interest were identified from an anatomic atlas and a finger movement task in each subject in the primary motor cortex and motor activation region of the bilateral superior cerebellum. Correlation was measured in the time series of each thalamic voxel with the 4 seeds. An analogous procedure was performed on a single subject imaged for 10 hours to constrain the time needed for single-subject optimization of thalamic targets. RESULTS: Mean connectivity images from 58 subjects showed precisely localized targets within the expected location of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus, within a single voxel of currently used deep brain stimulation anatomic targets. These targets could be mapped with single-voxel accuracy in a single subject with 3 hours of imaging time, though targets were reproduced in different locations for the individual than for the group averages. CONCLUSIONS: Interindividual variability likely exists in optimal placement for thalamic deep brain stimulation targeting of the cerebellar thalamus for essential tremor. Individualized thalamic targets can be precisely estimated for image guidance with sufficient imaging time.
Authors: N Tzourio-Mazoyer; B Landeau; D Papathanassiou; F Crivello; O Etard; N Delcroix; B Mazoyer; M Joliot Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: D Cordes; V M Haughton; K Arfanakis; J D Carew; P A Turski; C H Moritz; M A Quigley; M E Meyerand Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Jeffrey S Anderson; Michael A Ferguson; Melissa Lopez-Larson; Deborah Yurgelun-Todd Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-11-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Dongyang Zhang; Abraham Z Snyder; Joshua S Shimony; Michael D Fox; Marcus E Raichle Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2009-09-03 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Koene R A Van Dijk; Trey Hedden; Archana Venkataraman; Karleyton C Evans; Sara W Lazar; Randy L Buckner Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2009-11-04 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: A L Benabid; P Pollak; C Gervason; D Hoffmann; D M Gao; M Hommel; J E Perret; J de Rougemont Journal: Lancet Date: 1991-02-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Julie G Pilitsis; Leo Verhagen Metman; John R Toleikis; Lindsay E Hughes; Sepehr B Sani; Roy A E Bakay Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: K Yamada; K Akazawa; S Yuen; M Goto; S Matsushima; A Takahata; M Nakagawa; K Mineura; T Nishimura Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2009-11-19 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Jeffrey S Anderson; Jared A Nielsen; Alyson L Froehlich; Molly B DuBray; T Jason Druzgal; Annahir N Cariello; Jason R Cooperrider; Brandon A Zielinski; Caitlin Ravichandran; P Thomas Fletcher; Andrew L Alexander; Erin D Bigler; Nicholas Lange; Janet E Lainhart Journal: Brain Date: 2011-10-17 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Josué M Avecillas-Chasin; Fernando Alonso-Frech; Olga Parras; Nayade Del Prado; Juan A Barcia Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2015-05-12 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: Michael D Fox; Randy L Buckner; Hesheng Liu; M Mallar Chakravarty; Andres M Lozano; Alvaro Pascual-Leone Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-09-29 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: E H Middlebrooks; R A Domingo; T Vivas-Buitrago; L Okromelidze; T Tsuboi; J K Wong; R S Eisinger; L Almeida; M R Burns; A Horn; R J Uitti; R E Wharen; V M Holanda; S S Grewal Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Andreas Horn; Martin Reich; Johannes Vorwerk; Ningfei Li; Gregor Wenzel; Qianqian Fang; Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch; Robert Nickl; Andreas Kupsch; Jens Volkmann; Andrea A Kühn; Michael D Fox Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: P Justin Rossi; Aysegul Gunduz; Jack Judy; Linda Wilson; Andre Machado; James J Giordano; W Jeff Elias; Marvin A Rossi; Christopher L Butson; Michael D Fox; Cameron C McIntyre; Nader Pouratian; Nicole C Swann; Coralie de Hemptinne; Robert E Gross; Howard J Chizeck; Michele Tagliati; Andres M Lozano; Wayne Goodman; Jean-Philippe Langevin; Ron L Alterman; Umer Akbar; Greg A Gerhardt; Warren M Grill; Mark Hallett; Todd Herrington; Jeffrey Herron; Craig van Horne; Brian H Kopell; Anthony E Lang; Codrin Lungu; Daniel Martinez-Ramirez; Alon Y Mogilner; Rene Molina; Enrico Opri; Kevin J Otto; Karim G Oweiss; Yagna Pathak; Aparna Shukla; Jonathan Shute; Sameer A Sheth; Ludy C Shih; G Karl Steinke; Alexander I Tröster; Nora Vanegas; Kareem A Zaghloul; Leopoldo Cendejas-Zaragoza; Leonard Verhagen; Kelly D Foote; Michael S Okun Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2016-04-06 Impact factor: 4.677