Literature DB >> 21885301

The biomechanical role of scaffolds in augmented rotator cuff tendon repairs.

Amit Aurora1, Jesse A McCarron, Antonie J van den Bogert, Jorge E Gatica, Joseph P Iannotti, Kathleen A Derwin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Scaffolds continue to be developed and used for rotator cuff repair augmentation; however, the appropriate scaffold material properties and/or surgical application techniques for achieving optimal biomechanical performance remains unknown. The objectives of the study were to simulate a previously validated spring-network model for clinically relevant scenarios to predict: (1) the manner in which changes to components of the repair influence the biomechanical performance of the repair and (2) the percent load carried by the scaffold augmentation component.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The models were parametrically varied to simulate clinically relevant scenarios, namely, changes in tendon quality, altered surgical technique(s), and different scaffold designs. The biomechanical performance of the repair constructs and the percent load carried by the scaffold component were evaluated for each of the simulated scenarios.
RESULTS: The model predicts that the biomechanical performance of a rotator cuff repair can be modestly increased by augmenting the repair with a scaffold that has tendon-like properties. However, engineering a scaffold with supraphysiologic stiffness may not translate into yet stiffer or stronger repairs. Importantly, the mechanical properties of a repair construct appear to be most influenced by the properties of the tendon-to-bone repair. The model suggests that in the clinical setting of a weak tendon-to-bone repair, scaffold augmentation may significantly off-load the repair and largely mitigate the poor construct properties.
CONCLUSIONS: The model suggests that future efforts in the field of rotator cuff repair augmentation may be directed toward strategies that strengthen the tendon-to-bone repair and/or toward engineering scaffolds with tendon-like mechanical properties.
Copyright © 2012 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21885301     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  17 in total

Review 1.  [Patch augmentation of the rotator cuff. A reasonable choice or a waste of money?].

Authors:  M Flury
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Platelet-rich plasma and other cellular strategies in orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  Phillip N Williams; George Moran; James P Bradley; Neal S ElAttrache; Joshua S Dines
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-03

3.  Braided and Stacked Electrospun Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Tendon and Ligament Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Benjamin B Rothrauff; Brian B Lauro; Guang Yang; Richard E Debski; Volker Musahl; Rocky S Tuan
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  The Rotator Cuff Organ: Integrating Developmental Biology, Tissue Engineering, and Surgical Considerations to Treat Chronic Massive Rotator Cuff Tears.

Authors:  Benjamin B Rothrauff; Thierry Pauyo; Richard E Debski; Mark W Rodosky; Rocky S Tuan; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 5.  How to Use a Graft in Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Literature Review Update of Interposition and Superior Capsule Reconstruction Techniques.

Authors:  Kevin C Wall; Alison P Toth; Grant E Garrigues
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-03

6.  History of rotator cuff surgery.

Authors:  Pietro Randelli; Davide Cucchi; Vincenza Ragone; Laura de Girolamo; Paolo Cabitza; Mario Randelli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Scaffolds for tendon and ligament repair and regeneration.

Authors:  Anthony Ratcliffe; David L Butler; Nathaniel A Dyment; Paul J Cagle; Christopher S Proctor; Seena S Ratcliffe; Evan L Flatow
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  [Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with patch augmentation].

Authors:  M Flury
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 9.  Augmenting endogenous repair of soft tissues with nanofibre scaffolds.

Authors:  Mathew Baldwin; Sarah Snelling; Stephanie Dakin; Andrew Carr
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Use of biologics in rotator cuff disorders: Current concept review.

Authors:  Mr Lebur Rohman; Martyn Snow
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.