Literature DB >> 21885140

Trans-abdominal ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) correlation for conformal intracavitary brachytherapy in carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Umesh Mahantshetty1, Nehal Khanna, Jamema Swamidas, Reena Engineer, Meenakshi H Thakur, Nikhil H Merchant, Deepak D Deshpande, Shyamkishore Shrivastava.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Trans-abdominal ultrasonography (US) is capable of determining size, shape, thickness, and diameter of uterus, cervix and disease at cervix or parametria. To assess the potential value of US for image-guided cervical cancer brachytherapy, we compared US-findings relevant for brachytherapy to the corresponding findings obtained from MR imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with biopsy proven cervical cancer undergoing definitive radiotherapy with/without concomitant Cisplatin chemotherapy and suitable for brachytherapy were invited to participate in this study. US and MR were performed in a similar reproducible patient positioning after intracavitary application. US mid-sagittal and axial image at the level of external cervical os was acquired. Reference points D1 to D9 and distances were identified with respect to central tandem and flange, to delineate cervix, central disease, and external surface of the uterus.
RESULTS: Thirty-two applications using CT/MR compatible applicators were evaluable. The D1 and D3 reference distances which represent anterior surface had a strong correlation with R=0.92 and 0.94 (p<0.01). The D2 and D4 reference distances in contrast, which represent the posterior surface had a moderate (D2) and a strong (D4) correlation with R=0.63 and 0.82 (p<0.01). Of all, D2 reference distance showed the least correlation of MR and US. The D5 reference distance representing the fundal thickness from tandem tip had a correlation of 0.98. The reference distances for D6, D7, D8, and D9 had a correlation of 0.94, 0.82, 0.96, and 0.93, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study evaluating the use of US, suggests a reasonably strong correlation with MR in delineating uterus, cervix, and central disease for 3D conformal intracavitary brachytherapy planning.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21885140     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  16 in total

Review 1.  Review of strategies for MRI based reconstruction of endocavitary and interstitial applicators in brachytherapy of cervical cancer.

Authors:  José Richart; Vicente Carmona-Meseguer; Teresa García-Martínez; Antonio Herreros; Antonio Otal; Santiago Pellejero; Ana Tornero-López; José Pérez-Calatayud
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-07-23

2.  Evaluation of uterine ultrasound imaging in cervical radiotherapy; a comparison of autoscan and conventional probe.

Authors:  Mariwan Baker; David T Cooper; Claus F Behrens
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Local experience in cervical cancer imaging: Comparison in tumour assessment between TRUS and MRI.

Authors:  Claudia Ordeanu; Diana Cristina Pop; Radu Badea; Csaba Csutak; Nicolae Todor; Calin Ordeanu; Reka Kerekes; Ovidiu Coza; Viorica Nagy; Patriciu Achimas-Cadariu; Alexandru Irimie
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-02-17

Review 4.  Image-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  John A Vargo; Sushil Beriwal
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10

5.  Feasibility of transrectal ultrasonography for assessment of cervical cancer.

Authors:  M P Schmid; R Pötter; P Brader; A Kratochwil; G Goldner; K Kirchheiner; A Sturdza; C Kirisits
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 6.  Brachytherapy in cancer cervix: Time to move ahead from point A?

Authors:  Anurita Srivastava; Niloy Ranjan Datta
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-10

7.  Will MR image-guided brachytherapy be a standard of care for cervical cancer in future? An Indian perspective.

Authors:  D D Deshpande
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2012-01

8.  Reply to the comment of S. VanDyk and K. Narayan on the editorial "IMRT, IGRT and other high technology become standard in external beam radiotherapy: But is image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer too expensive?" J Med Phys 2015;40:1-4.

Authors:  Swamidas V Jamema; Christian Kirisits
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

9.  IMRT, IGRT, and other high technology becomes standard in external beam radiotherapy: But is image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer too expensive?

Authors:  Jamema V Swamidas; Christian Kirisits
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

10.  Portfolio of prospective clinical trials including brachytherapy: an analysis of the ClinicalTrials.gov database.

Authors:  Nikola Cihoric; Alexandros Tsikkinis; Cristina Gutierrez Miguelez; Vratislav Strnad; Ivan Soldatovic; Pirus Ghadjar; Branislav Jeremic; Alan Dal Pra; Daniel M Aebersold; Kristina Lössl
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.