Literature DB >> 21885095

The eliciting dose of peanut in double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges decreases with increasing age and specific IgE level in children and young adults.

Tjitske van der Zee1, Anthony Dubois, Marjan Kerkhof, Sicco van der Heide, Berber Vlieg-Boerstra.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several risk factors for severe anaphylactic reactions to food in daily life are known. However, to date, it is not possible to predict the severity of allergic reactions to food in the individual patient with accuracy. Some studies show that a history of severe reactions is associated with a lower eliciting dose in double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFCs). Therefore, in this study, the eliciting dose was used as a measure of clinical sensitivity.
OBJECTIVES: To study whether risk factors for severe allergic reactions to food in daily life such as age, degree of sensitization, and coexistent atopic disease influence the eliciting dose in DBPCFCs in children allergic to peanut.
METHODS: Data from children who had clinical reactions to peanut during DBPCFCs at the University Medical Center Groningen (2001-2009) were analyzed. A Cox regression model was used to analyze the association of the determinants with the eliciting dose.
RESULTS: One hundred twenty-six positive DBPCFCs with peanut were analyzed. Age older than 10 years, a specific IgE level above the lowest tertile (≥ 5.6 kU/L), and the absence of atopic dermatitis were associated with reactions to lower doses: respective hazard ratios 1.89 (95% CI, 1.28-2.81; P = .001), 2.03 (95% CI, 1.37-3.00; P < .0001), and 0.45 (95% CI, 0.29-0.71; P = .001) present versus absent. No significant associations with the eliciting dose were found for sex, the presence of asthma and rhinitis, and the severity of food reactions by history.
CONCLUSIONS: Using the eliciting dose as a measure of clinical sensitivity, greater clinical sensitivity in DBPCFCs to peanut was found to be associated with increasing age, higher specific IgE level, and the absence of atopic dermatitis. This finding may explain why adolescents experience severe allergic reactions in daily life to peanut more often than do younger children.
Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21885095     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.07.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  10 in total

Review 1.  Allergic reaction to peanuts: can we predict reaction severity in the wild?

Authors:  Aisling Flinn; Jonathan O'B Hourihane
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.806

2.  Peanut oral immunotherapy in adolescents: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Elodie Michaud; Bertrand Evrard; Bruno Pereira; Emmanuelle Rochette; Lise Bernard; Paul-Olivier Rouzaire; Nelly Gourdon-Dubois; Etienne Merlin; Jean-Luc Fauquert
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Distinct parameters of the basophil activation test reflect the severity and threshold of allergic reactions to peanut.

Authors:  Alexandra F Santos; George Du Toit; Abdel Douiri; Suzana Radulovic; Alick Stephens; Victor Turcanu; Gideon Lack
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 10.793

4.  Eliciting dose is associated with tolerance development in peanut and cow's milk allergic children.

Authors:  C Nitsche; C D Westerlaken-van Ginkel; B J Kollen; A B Sprikkelman; G H Koppelman; A E J Dubois
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 5.871

Review 5.  Consensus on DEfinition of Food Allergy SEverity (DEFASE) an integrated mixed methods systematic review.

Authors:  Stefania Arasi; Ulugbek Nurmatov; Audrey Dunn-Galvin; Shahd Daher; Graham Roberts; Paul J Turner; Sayantani B Shinder; Ruchi Gupta; Philippe Eigenmann; Anna Nowak-Wegrzyn; Mario A Sánchez Borges; Ignacio J Ansotegui; Montserrat Fernandez-Rivas; Stavros Petrou; Luciana Kase Tanno; Marta Vazquez-Ortiz; Brian P Vickery; Gary Wing-Kin Wong; Motohiro Ebisawa; Alessandro Fiocchi
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.084

6.  A Food, a Bite, a Sip: How Much Allergen Is in That?

Authors:  Melanie Kok; Astrid Compagner; Ina Panneman; Aline Sprikkelman; Berber Vlieg-Boerstra
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Oral peanut challenge identifies an allergy but the peanut allergen threshold sensitivity is not reproducible.

Authors:  Susanne Glaumann; Anna Nopp; S G O Johansson; Magnus P Borres; Caroline Nilsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Association of STAT6 gene variants with food allergy diagnosed by double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges.

Authors:  C D van Ginkel; M E Pettersson; A E J Dubois; G H Koppelman
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 13.146

9.  Prediction of the severity of allergic reactions to foods.

Authors:  M E Pettersson; G H Koppelman; B M J Flokstra-de Blok; B J Kollen; A E J Dubois
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2018-03-04       Impact factor: 13.146

10.  Assessing severity of anaphylaxis: a data-driven comparison of 23 instruments.

Authors:  Esben Eller; Antonella Muraro; Ronald Dahl; Charlotte Gotthard Mortz; Carsten Bindslev-Jensen
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 5.871

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.