Literature DB >> 2188503

But they are not thresholds: a critical analysis of the documentation of Threshold Limit Values.

S A Roach1, S M Rappaport.   

Abstract

Threshold Limit Values (TLVs) represent conditions under which the TLV Committee of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) believes that nearly all workers may be repeatedly exposed without adverse effect. A detailed research was made of the references in the 1976 Documentation to data on "industrial experience" and "experimental human studies." The references, sorted for those including both the incidence of adverse effects and the corresponding exposure, yielded 158 paired sets of data. Upon analysis it was found that, where the exposure was at or below the TLV, only a minority of studies showed no adverse effects (11 instances) and the remainder indicated that up to 100% of those exposed had been affected (8 instances of 100%). Although, the TLVs were poorly correlated with the incidence of adverse effects, a surprisingly strong correlation was found between the TLVs and the exposures reported in the corresponding studies cited in the Documentation. Upon repeating the search of references to human experience, at or below the TLVs, listed in the more recent, 1986 edition of the Documentation, a very similar picture has emerged from the 72 sets of clear data which were found. Again, only a minority of studies showed no adverse effects and TLVs were poorly correlated with the incidence of adverse effect and well correlated with the measured exposure. Finally, a careful analysis revealed that authors' conclusions in the references (cited in the 1976 Documentation) regarding exposure-response relationships at or below the TLVs were generally found to be at odds with the conclusions of the TLV Committee. These findings suggest that those TLVs which are justified on the basis of "industrial experience" are not based purely upon health considerations. Rather, those TLVs appear to reflect the levels of exposure which were perceived at the time to be achievable in industry. Thus, ACGIH TLVs may represent guides of levels which have been achieved, but they are certainly not thresholds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2188503     DOI: 10.1002/ajim.4700170607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  12 in total

1.  A glossary for research in occupational health.

Authors:  A M García; H Checkoway
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Statistical modeling of occupational chlorinated solvent exposures for case-control studies using a literature-based database.

Authors:  Misty J Hein; Martha A Waters; Avima M Ruder; Mark R Stenzel; Aaron Blair; Patricia A Stewart
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2010-04-23

3.  OSHA's four inconsistent carcinogen policies.

Authors:  J C Robinson; D G Paxman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Wheezing, asthma, hay fever, and atopic eczema in relation to maternal occupations in pregnancy.

Authors:  L L Magnusson; H Wennborg; J P Bonde; J Olsen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Corporation-induced diseases, upstream epidemiologic surveillance, and urban health.

Authors:  René I Jahiel
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.671

6.  From health-based to technology-based standards for hazardous air pollutants.

Authors:  J C Robinson; W S Pease
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  On the need of a sampling strategy in biological monitoring: the example of hexane exposure.

Authors:  A Mutti; E Bergamaschi; S Ghittori; M Imbriani; I Franchini
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 8.  Developments in reproductive risk management.

Authors:  A Stijkel; F J van Dijk
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Profile of patients with chemical injury and sensitivity.

Authors:  G Ziem; J McTamney
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Risk assessment: the perspective and experience of U.S. environmentalists.

Authors:  E K Silbergeld
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.