Literature DB >> 2188499

An assessment of error in parental occupation from the birth certificate.

G M Shaw1, L H Malcoe, L A Croen, D F Smith.   

Abstract

This study used data obtained through interview with the mother to determine whether parental occupations from the California birth certificate were representative of maternal occupations during the first trimester of pregnancy or paternal occupations 3 months before conception. For 71% of mothers and 80% of fathers, the occupation on the birth certificate was the same as the occupation elicited from the interview. The sensitivity of the birth certificate for determining whether a mother or father was employed or employed in a particular standard occupational category ranged from 50 to 100%. The bias to the odds ratio associated with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 80% is presented. The results suggest that the use of birth certificate information on parental occupation to screen for associations with congenital malformations will miss all but very strong associations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2188499     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  7 in total

1.  Factors associated with employment status before and during pregnancy: Implications for studies of pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Carissa M Rocheleau; Stephen J Bertke; Christina C Lawson; Paul A Romitti; Tania A Desrosiers; Aaron J Agopian; Erin Bell; Suzanne M Gilboa
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.214

2.  Sex ratio in relation to fathers' occupations.

Authors:  H O Dickinson; L Parker
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Paternal occupation and birth defects: findings from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.

Authors:  Tania A Desrosiers; Amy H Herring; Stuart K Shapira; Mariëtte Hooiveld; Tom J Luben; Michele L Herdt-Losavio; Shao Lin; Andrew F Olshan
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Maternal occupational physical activity and risk for orofacial clefts.

Authors:  A J Agopian; Jihye Kim; Peter H Langlois; Laura Lee; Lawrence W Whitehead; Elaine Symanski; Michele L Herdt; George L Delclos
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  Inclusion of non-viable neonates in the birth record and its impact on infant mortality rates in Shelby County, Tennessee, USA.

Authors:  Bryan L Williams; Melina S Magsumbol
Journal:  Pediatr Rep       Date:  2010-06-18

6.  Consumption of PCB-contaminated sport fish and risk of spontaneous fetal death.

Authors:  P Mendola; G M Buck; J E Vena; M Zielezny; L E Sever
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Validity of parental work information on the birth certificate.

Authors:  Jean D Brender; Lucina Suarez; Peter H Langlois
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 3.295

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.